View Item 

Show simple item record

Influence of Malpractice History on the Practice of Screening and Surveillance for Barrett's Esophagus
dc.contributor.authorRubenstein, Joel H.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSaini, Sameer D.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKuhn, Latoyaen_US
dc.contributor.authorMcMahon, Laurenceen_US
dc.contributor.authorSharma, Pratimaen_US
dc.contributor.authorPardi, Darrell S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSchoenfeld, Philip S.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-01T21:22:25Z
dc.date.available2010-06-01T21:22:25Z
dc.date.issued2008-04en_US
dc.identifier.citationRubenstein, Joel H.; Saini, Sameer D.; Kuhn, Latoya; McMahon, Laurence; Sharma, Pratima; Pardi, Darrell S.; Schoenfeld, Philip (2008). "Influence of Malpractice History on the Practice of Screening and Surveillance for Barrett's Esophagus." The American Journal of Gastroenterology 103(4): 842-849. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/74437>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0002-9270en_US
dc.identifier.issn1572-0241en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/74437
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=18076733&dopt=citationen_US
dc.format.extent1201926 bytes
dc.format.extent3109 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Incen_US
dc.rights©2008 by Am. Coll. of Gastroenterologyen_US
dc.titleInfluence of Malpractice History on the Practice of Screening and Surveillance for Barrett's Esophagusen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelInternal Medicine and Specialtiesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumAnn Arbor Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherMayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesotaen_US
dc.identifier.pmid18076733en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/74437/1/j.1572-0241.2007.01689.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01689.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceThe American Journal of Gastroenterologyen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEl-Serag HB, Mason AC, Petersen N, et al. Epidemiological differences between adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus and adenocarcinoma of the gastric cardia in the USA. Gut 2002; 50: 368 – 72.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePortale G, Peters JH, Hagen JA, et al. Comparison of the clinical and histological characteristics and survival of distal esophageal-gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma in patients with and without Barrett mucosa. Arch Surg 2005; 140: 570 – 4.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSampliner RE. Updated guidelines for the diagnosis, surveillance, and therapy of Barrett's esophagus. Am J Gastroenterol 2002; 97: 1888 – 95.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWang KK, Wongkeesong M, Buttar NS, et al. American Gastroenterological Association medical position statement: Role of the gastroenterologist in the management of esophageal carcinoma. Gastroenterology 2005; 128: 1468 – 70.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBoyer J, Robaszkiewicz M. Guidelines of the French Society of Digestive Endoscopy: monitoring of Barrett's esophagus. The Council of the French Society of Digestive Endoscopy. Endoscopy 2000; 32: 498 – 9.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference6  Anonymous. ASGE guideline: The role of endoscopy in the surveillance of premalignant conditions of the upper GI tract. Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 63: 570 – 80.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSharma P, McQuaid K, Dent J, et al. A critical review of the diagnosis and management of Barrett's esophagus: The AGA Chicago Workshop. Gastroenterology 2004; 127: 310 – 30.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWatson A, Heading RC, Shepherd NA. Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of Barrett's columnar-lined oesophagus. Available at: http://www.bsg.org.uk/bsgdisp1.php?id=3f4a76385e42599499e9&h=1&sh=1&i=1&b=1&m=00023. Accessed January 22, 2007.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceArmstrong D, Marshall JK, Chiba N, et al. Canadian Consensus Conference on the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease in adults – update 2004. Can J Gastroenterol 2005; 19: 15 – 35.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRice TW, Blackstone EH, Rybicki LA, et al. Refining esophageal cancer staging. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003; 125: 1103 – 13.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFalk GW, Ours TM, Richter JE. Practice patterns for surveillance of Barrett's esophagus in the United States. Gastrointest Endosc 2000; 52: 197 – 203.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCruz-Correa M, Gross CP, Canto MI, et al. The impact of practice guidelines in the management of Barrett esophagus: A national prospective cohort study of physicians. Arch Intern Med 2001; 161: 2588 – 95.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMoss A, Clarke E, Crowe J, et al. Management of Barrett's oesophagus in 2001 in Ireland. Ir J Med Sci 2003; 172: 174 – 6.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShen EF, Gladstone S, Milne G, et al. Endoscopic surveillance practice for Barrett's oesophagus in Scotland and early experience in implementing local guidelines. Scott Med J 2003; 48: 43 – 5.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMacNeil-Covin L, Casson AG, Malatjalian D, et al. A survey of Canadian gastroenterologists about the management of Barrett's esophagus. Can J Gastroenterol 2003; 17: 313 – 7.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencevan Sandick JW, Bartelsman JF, van Lanschot JJ, et al. Surveillance of Barrett's oesophagus: Physicians' practices and review of current guidelines. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2000; 12: 111 – 7.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLin OS, Mannava S, Hwang KL, et al. Reasons for current practices in managing Barrett's esophagus. Dis Esophagus 2002; 15: 39 – 45.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGlassman PA, Rolph JE, Petersen LP, et al. Physicians' personal malpractice experiences are not related to defensive clinical practices. J Health Polit Policy Law 1996; 21: 219 – 41.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLocke GR, Zinsmeister AR, Talley NJ. Can symptoms predict endoscopic findings in GERD? Gastrointest Endosc 2003; 58: 661 – 70.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGerson LB, Edson R, Lavori PW, et al. Use of a simple symptom questionnaire to predict Barrett's esophagus in patients with symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux. Am J Gastroenterol 2001; 96: 2005 – 12.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSampliner RE. Practice guidelines on the diagnosis, surveillance, and therapy of Barrett's esophagus. The Practice Parameters Committee of the American College of Gastroenterology. Am J Gastroenterol 1998; 93: 1028 – 32.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference22  Anonymous. The role of endoscopy in the surveillance of premalignant conditions of the upper gastrointestinal tract. Gastrointest Endosc 1998; 48; 663 – 8.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePrentice RA, Koehler JJ. A normality bias in legal decision making. Cornell Law Rev 2003; 88: 583 – 650.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMatthews JR. Practice guidelines and tort reform: The legal system confronts the technocratic wish. J Health Polit Policy Law 1999; 24: 275 – 304.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHyams AL, Brandenburg JA, Lipsitz SR, et al. Practice guidelines and malpractice litigation: A two-way street. Ann Intern Med 1995; 122: 450 – 5.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShaheen NJ. Advances in Barrett's esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma. Gastroenterology 2005; 128: 1554 – 66.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKravitz RL, Rolph JE, Petersen L. Omission-related malpractice claims and the limits of defensive medicine. Med Care Res Rev 1997; 54: 456 – 71.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencevan Soest EM, Dieleman JP, Siersema PD, et al. Increasing incidence of Barrett's oesophagus in the general population. Gut 2005; 54: 1062 – 6.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSontag SJ, Leya J, Schnell T, et al. Barrett's esophagus develops during youth or when we are born – not during adulthood. Part 5 in a series: The origins of GERD [abstract]. Gastroenterology 2004; 126 ( Suppl 2 ): A308.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
j.1572-0241.2007.01689.x.pdf
Size:
1.146MB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.