View Item 

Show simple item record

The Effects of Donor and Recipient Practices on Transplant Center Finances
dc.contributor.authorEnglesbe, Michael J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorAds, Yasser M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorCohn, J. A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSonnenday, Christopher J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLynch, Raymond J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSung, Randall S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorPelletier, Shawn J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBirkmeyer, John D.en_US
dc.contributor.authorPunch, Jeffery D.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-01T21:23:29Z
dc.date.available2010-06-01T21:23:29Z
dc.date.issued2008-03en_US
dc.identifier.citationEnglesbe, M. J.; Ads, Y.; Cohn, J. A.; Sonnenday, C. J.; Lynch, R.; Sung, R. S.; Pelletier, S. J.; Birkmeyer, J. D.; Punch, J. D. (2008). "The Effects of Donor and Recipient Practices on Transplant Center Finances." American Journal of Transplantation 8(3): 586-592. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/74453>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1600-6135en_US
dc.identifier.issn1600-6143en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/74453
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=18294154&dopt=citationen_US
dc.format.extent89864 bytes
dc.format.extent3109 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltden_US
dc.rights2008 American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeonsen_US
dc.subject.otherDelayed Graft Function (DGF)en_US
dc.subject.otherEconomic Analysisen_US
dc.subject.otherExpanded Criteria Donorsen_US
dc.subject.otherKidney Transplantationen_US
dc.titleThe Effects of Donor and Recipient Practices on Transplant Center Financesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMedicine (General)en_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumMichigan Surgical Collaborative for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MIen_US
dc.identifier.pmid18294154en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/74453/1/j.1600-6143.2007.02098.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1600-6143.2007.02098.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceAmerican Journal of Transplantationen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWolfe RA, Ashby VB, Milford EL et al. Comparison of mortality in all patients on dialysis, patients on dialysis awaiting transplantation, and recipients of a first cadaveric transplant. N Engl J Med 1999; 341: 1725 – 1730.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCohen DJ, St Martin L, Christensen LL, Bloom RD, Sung RS. Kidney and pancreas transplantation in the United States, 1995–2004. Am J Transplant 2006; 6 ( 5 Pt 2 ): 1153 – 1169.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference3.  Center specific reports—Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. Available from: http://www.ustransplant.org. 2007. Accessed October 20, 2007.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMerion RM, Ashby VB, Wolfe RA et al. Deceased-donor characteristics and the survival benefit of kidney transplantation. JAMA 2005; 294: 2726 – 2733.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference5.  The 2006 OPTN/SRTR Annual Report—US Department of Health and Human Services, 2006. Available from: http://www.ustransplant.org. Accessed October 20, 2007.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWhiting JF, Woodward RS, Zavala EY et al. Economic cost of expanded criteria donors in cadaveric renal transplantation: Analysis of Medicare payments. Transplantation 2000; 70: 755 – 760.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSung RS, Guidinger MK, Lake CD et al. Impact of the expanded criteria donor allocation system on the use of expanded criteria donor kidneys. Transplantation 2005; 79: 1257 – 1261.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference8.  Producer Price Index for the Direct Health and Medical Insurance Carriers Industry. U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2006. Available from: http://www.bls.gov. Accessed October 20, 2007.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceResnick AS, Corrigan D, Mullen JL, Kaiser LR. Surgeon contribution to hospital bottom line: not all are created equal. Ann Surg 2005; 242: 530 – 537; discussion 537 – 539.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDanovitch GM, Cohen DJ, Weir MR et al. Current status of kidney and pancreas transplantation in the United States, 1994–2003. Am J Transplant 2005; 5 ( 4 Pt 2 ): 904 – 915.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePunch JD, Hayes DH, LaPorte FB, McBride V, Seely MS. Organ donation and utilization in the United States, 1996–2005. Am J Transplant 2007; 7 ( 5 Pt 2 ): 1327 – 1338.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMarks WH, Wagner D, Pearson TC et al. Organ donation and utilization, 1995–2004: entering the collaborative era. Am J Transplant 2006; 6 ( 5 Pt 2 ): 1101 – 1110.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchold JD, Kaplan B, Howard RJ, Reed AI, Foley DP, Meier-Kriesche HU. Are we frozen in time? Analysis of the utilization and efficacy of pulsatile perfusion in renal transplantation. Am J Transplant 2005; 5: 1681 – 1688.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKubota Y, Hayakawa K, Sasaki H et al. Should we discard the graft? Analysis of the renal grafts with a total ischemia time of more than 24 hours donated after cardiac death. Am J Transplant 2007; 7: 1177 – 1180.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHayakawa K, Kubota Y, Sasaki H et al. Should we discard the renal allografts from cardiac death donors that have total ischemic time longer than 24 hours? Transplant Proc 2006; 38: 3382 – 3383.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHirth RA. The organization and financing of kidney dialysis and transplant care in the United States of America. Int J Health Care Finance Econ 2007.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHirth RA, Turenne MN, Wheeler JR et al. Case-Mix adjustment for an expanded renal prospective payment system. J Am Soc Nephrol 2007.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
j.1600-6143.2007.02098.x.pdf
Size:
87.75KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.