View Item 

Show simple item record

Predicted Lifetimes for Adult and Pediatric Split Liver Versus Adult Whole Liver Transplant Recipients
dc.contributor.authorMerion, Robert M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorRush, Sarah H.en_US
dc.contributor.authorDykstra, Dawn M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorGoodrich, Nathan P.en_US
dc.contributor.authorFreeman, Richard B.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWolfe, Robert A.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-01T21:27:38Z
dc.date.available2010-06-01T21:27:38Z
dc.date.issued2004-11en_US
dc.identifier.citationMerion, Robert M.; Rush, Sarah H.; Dykstra, Dawn M.; Goodrich, Nathan; Freeman, Richard B.; Wolfe, Robert A. (2004). "Predicted Lifetimes for Adult and Pediatric Split Liver Versus Adult Whole Liver Transplant Recipients." American Journal of Transplantation 4(11): 1792-1797. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/74519>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1600-6135en_US
dc.identifier.issn1600-6143en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/74519
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=15476478&dopt=citationen_US
dc.format.extent102141 bytes
dc.format.extent3109 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherMunksgaard International Publishersen_US
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltden_US
dc.rightsBlackwell Munksgaard 2004en_US
dc.titlePredicted Lifetimes for Adult and Pediatric Split Liver Versus Adult Whole Liver Transplant Recipientsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMedicine (General)en_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumScientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity Renal Research and Education Association, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherTufts-New England Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USAen_US
dc.identifier.pmid15476478en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/74519/1/j.1600-6143.2004.00594.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1600-6143.2004.00594.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceAmerican Journal of Transplantationen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStarzl TE, Marchioro TL, Porter KA. Progress in homotransplantation of the liver. Adv Surg 1966; 2: 295 – 370.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStarzl TE, Marchioro TL, Porter KA, Brettschneider L. Homotransplantation of the liver. Transplantation 1967; 5 ( 4 Suppl ): 790 – 803.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBroelsch CE, Emond JC, Whitington PF, Thistlethwaite JR, Baker AL, Lichtor JL. Application of reduced-size liver transplants as split grafts, auxiliary orthotopic grafts, and living related segmental transplants. Ann Surg 1990; 212 ( 3 ): 368 – 375; discussion 75–77.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOtte JB, de Ville de Goyet J, Alberti D, Balladur P, de Hemptinne B. The concept and technique of the split liver in clinical transplantation. Surgery 1990; 107 ( 6 ): 605 – 612.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBroelsch CE, Stevens LH, Whitington PF. The use of reduced-size liver transplants in children, including split livers and living related liver transplants. Eur J Pediatr Surg 1991; 1 ( 3 ): 166 – 171.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLangnas AN, Marujo WC, Inagaki M, Stratta RJ, Wood RP, Shaw BW, Jr. The results of reduced-size liver transplantation, including split livers, in patients with end-stage liver disease. Transplantation 1992; 53 ( 2 ): 387 – 391.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHesse UJ, Pattyn P, Kerremans I et al. Procurement, grafting, and early graft function in liver transplantation, including reduced size and split livers from cadaveric and living related donors. Transplant Proc 1993; 25 ( 4 ): 2628 – 2629.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMoreno-Gonzalez E, Gomez SR, Garcia GI et al. Utilization of split liver grafts in orthotopic liver transplantation. Hepatogastroenterology 1993; 40 ( 1 ): 17 – 20.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMerion RM, Campbell DA, Jr. Split-liver transplantation: one plus one doesn't always equal two. Hepatology 1991; 14 ( 3 ): 572 – 574.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSantori G, Andorno E, Antonucci A, Morelli N, Panaro F, Valente U. Putative survival predictors in right-graft (adult) recipients after in situ split-liver transplantation: a retrospective single-center analysis. Transpl Int 2003; 16 ( 7 ): 476 – 485.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDunn SP, Haynes JH, Nicolette LA et al. Split liver transplantation benefits the recipient of the ‘leftover liver’. J Pediatr Surg 1997; 32 ( 2 ): 252 – 254; discussion 4–5.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePappas SC, Rouch DA, Stevens LH. New techniques for liver transplantation: reduced-size, split-liver, living-related and auxiliary liver transplantation. Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl 1995; 208: 97 – 100.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSlooff MJ. Reduced size liver transplantation, split liver transplantation, and living related liver transplantation in relation to the donor organ shortage.[comment]. Transpl Int 1995; 8 ( 1 ): 65 – 68.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJohnston TD, Ranjan D. Extending liver transplantation: reduced-size-, split-, and living-donor grafts. Hepatogastroenterology 1998; 45 ( 23 ): 1391 – 1394.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMirza DF, Achilleos O, Pirenne J, Buckels JA, McMaster P, Mayer AD. Encouraging results of split-liver transplantation. Br J Surg 1998; 85 ( 4 ): 494 – 497.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBusuttil RW, Goss JA. Split liver transplantation. Ann Surg 1999; 229 ( 3 ): 313 – 321.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencede Ville de Goyet J. Split liver transplantation in Europe—1988 to 1993. Transplantation 1995; 59 ( 10 ): 1371 – 1376.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEmond JC, Whitington PF, Thistlethwaite JR et al. Transplantation of two patients with one liver. Analysis of a preliminary experience with ‘split-liver’ grafting. Ann Surg 1990; 212 ( 1 ): 14 – 22.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRenz JF, Yersiz H, Reichert PR et al. Split-liver transplantation: a review. Am J Transplant 2003; 3 ( 11 ): 1323 – 1335.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference20.  Social Security Administration Death Master File. Federal Computer Products Center, National Technical Information Service, U.S. Department of Commerce, Springfield, VA.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHarmon WE, Merion RM, Rush S, Goodrich N, Guidinger M. Final Analysis for Data Request from the OPTN Pediatric Committee—MELD/PELD Subcommittee Conference Call of July 17, 2003. Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients 2003.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRoberts JP. Ethical issues in split versus whole liver transplantation. ( In press ).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference23.  Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network. Policy 3.6. Allocation of deceased livers. http://www.optn.org/PoliciesandBylaws/policies/pdfs/policy_8.pdf ( Accessed 02/02/2004 ).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRenz JF, Emond JC, Yersiz H, Ascher NL, Busuttil RW. Split-liver transplantation in the United States: outcomes of a national survey. Ann Surg 2004; 239 ( 2 ): 172 – 181.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYersiz H, Renz JF, Farmer DG, Hisatake GM, McDiarmid SV, Busuttil RW. One hundred in situ split-liver transplantations: a single-center experience. Ann Surg 2003; 238 ( 4 ): 496 – 505; discussion 6–7.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRoberts JP, Hulbert-Shearon TE, Merion RM, Wolfe RA, Port FK. Influence of graft type on outcomes after pediatric liver transplantation. Am J Transplant 2004; 4: 373 – 377.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceToso C, Ris F, Mentha G, Oberholzer J, Morel P, Majno P. Potential impact of in situ liver splitting on the number of available grafts. Transplantation 2002; 74 ( 2 ): 222 – 226.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
j.1600-6143.2004.00594.x.pdf
Size:
99.74KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.