Show simple item record

A double-blind multicenter comparison of domperidone and metoclopramide in the treatment of diabetic patients with symptoms of gastroparesis 1

dc.contributor.authorPatterson, Daviden_US
dc.contributor.authorAbell, Thomas L.en_US
dc.contributor.authorRothstein, Robinen_US
dc.contributor.authorKoch, Kennethen_US
dc.contributor.authorBarnett, Jeffreyen_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-01T21:29:29Z
dc.date.available2010-06-01T21:29:29Z
dc.date.issued1999-05en_US
dc.identifier.citationPatterson, David; Abell, Thomas; Rothstein, Robin; Koch, Kenneth; Barnett, Jeffrey (1999). "A double-blind multicenter comparison of domperidone and metoclopramide in the treatment of diabetic patients with symptoms of gastroparesis 1 ." The American Journal of Gastroenterology 94(5): 1230-1234. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/74548>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0002-9270en_US
dc.identifier.issn1572-0241en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/74548
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=10235199&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractA double-blind, multicenter, randomized trial was conducted to compare the side effects and efficacy of domperidone and metoclopramide in symptomatic diabetic gastroparesis. Methods : Ninety-three insulin-dependent diabetes patients with a ≥ 3-month history of gastroparesis symptoms were recruited; 48 received domperidone 2 × 10-mg tablets 4 times daily, and 45 received metoclopramide 1 × 10-mg tablet + 1 placebo tablet 4 times daily. Nausea, vomiting, bloating/distension, and early satiety were evaluated for severity after 2 and 4 wk. Adverse central nervous system (CNS) effects of somnolence, akathisia, asthenia, anxiety, depression, and reduced mental acuity were elicited and graded for severity at 2 and 4 wk. Results : Domperidone and metoclopramide were equally effective in alleviating symptoms of diabetic gastroparesis. Elicited adverse CNS effects were more severe and more common with metoclopramide. Somnolence was acknowledged by 49% of patients (mean severity score, 1.03) after 4 wk of metoclopramide compared with 29% of patients (mean severity score, 0.49) after 4 wk of domperidone (incidence, p = 0.02 ; severity; p = 0.03 ). A reduction in mental acuity was acknowledged by 33% of patients (mean severity score, 0.62) after 4 wk of metoclopramide, compared with 20% of patients (mean severity score, 0.27) after 4 wk of domperidone (incidence, p = 0.04 ; severity, p = 0.04 ). Akathisia, asthenia, anxiety, and depression were also acknowledged less often, and at a lower severity, after 4 wk of domperidone, although these differences were not statistically significant. Conclusions : Domperidone and metoclopramide effectively reduce the symptoms of diabetic gastroparesis; CNS side effects are more pronounced with metoclopramide.en_US
dc.format.extent299684 bytes
dc.format.extent3109 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/octet-stream
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherBlackwell Science Incen_US
dc.rights1999 by Am. Coll. of Gastroenterologyen_US
dc.titleA double-blind multicenter comparison of domperidone and metoclopramide in the treatment of diabetic patients with symptoms of gastroparesis 1en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelInternal Medicine and Specialtiesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherVirginia Mason Clinic Hospital, Seattle, Washington, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherUniversity of Tennessee Medical Center, Memphis, Tennessee, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherHospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherMilton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USAen_US
dc.identifier.pmid10235199en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/74548/1/j.1572-0241.1999.00456.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1572-0241.1999.00456.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceThe American Journal of Gastroenterologyen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFeldman M., Schiller L.R.. Disorders of gastrointestinal motility associated with diabetes mellitus. Ann Intern Med 1983; 98: 378 – 384.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKeshavarzian A., Iber F.L.. Gastrointestinal involvement in insulin-requiring diabetes mellitus. J Clin Gastroenterol 1987; 9: 685 – 692.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVan Dijl P.W., Hoffman S.J., Van Doormaal J.J., et al. Low prevalence of symptomatic gastric and esophageal motor dysfunction in diabetes mellitus. Gastroenterology 1989; 96: A524.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceReynolds J.C.. Prokinetic agents: A key in the future of gastroenterology. Gastroenterol Clinics North Am 1989; 18: 437 – 457.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKassander P.. Asymptomatic gastric retention in diabetics (gastroparesis diabetoricum). Ann Int Med 1958; 48: 797 – 812.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHorowitz M., Harding P.E., Maddox A.F., et al. Gastric and oesophageal emptying in patients with Type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus. Diabetologia 1989; 32: 151 – 159.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencevon der Ohe M., Camilleri M., Zimmerman B.R.. Management of diabetic enteropathy. The Endocrinologist 1993; 3: 400 – 408.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDrenth J.P.H., Engels L.G.J.B.. Diabetic gastroparesis. A critical reappraisal of new treatment strategies. Drugs 1992; 44: 537 – 553.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAlbibi R., McCallum R.W.. Metoclopramide: Pharmacology and clinical application. Ann Intern Med 1983; 98: 86 – 95.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVan Outryve M., De Nutte N., Van Eghem P., et al. Efficacy of cisapride in functional dyspepsia resistant to domperidone or metoclopramide: A double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Scand J Gastroenterol 1993; 28 ( suppl 195 ): 47 – 53.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChampion M.C., Gulenchyn K., O'Leary T., et al. Domperidone (Motilium) improves symptoms and solid phase gastric emptying in diabetic gastroparesis. Am J Gastroenterol 1987; 82: 975.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHeer M., Muller-Duysing W., Benes I., et al. Diabetic gastroparesis: Treatment with domperidone—A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Digestion 1983; 27: 214 – 217.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHorowitz M., Harding P.E., Chatterton B.E., et al. Acute and chronic effects of domperidone on gastric emptying in diabetic autonomic neuropathy. Dig Dis Sci 1985; 30: 1 – 9.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKoch K.L., Stern R.M., Stewart W.R., et al. Gastric emptying and gastric myoelectrical activity in patients with diabetic gastroparesis: Effect of long-term domperidone treatment. Am J Gastroenterol 1989; 84: 1069 – 1075.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKozarek R.. Domperidone for symptomatic management of diabetic gastroparesis in metoclopramide treatment failures. Adv Ther 1990; 7: 61 – 68.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcCallum R.W. Review of the current status of prokinetic agents in gastroenterology. Am J Gastroenterol 1985; 80: 1008 – 1016.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceParkes J.D.. Domperidone and Parkinson's disease. Clin Neuropharmacol 1986; 9: 517 – 531.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAhn Y.H., Maturu P., Steinheber F.U., Goldman J.M.. Association of diabetes mellitus with gastric bezoar formation. Arch Intern Med 1987; 147: 527 – 528.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMaddern G.J., Kiroff G.K., Leppard P.I., et al. Domperidone, metoclopramide, and placebo. J Clin Gastroenterol 1986; 8: 135 – 140.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.