View Item 

Show simple item record

DILEMMAS IN EVALUATION: IMPLICATIONS FOR ADMINISTRATORS OF SOCIAL ACTION PROGRAMS
dc.contributor.authorTripodi, Tonyen_US
dc.contributor.authorEpstein, Irwinen_US
dc.contributor.authorMacMurray, Carolen_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-01T21:32:31Z
dc.date.available2010-06-01T21:32:31Z
dc.date.issued1970-10en_US
dc.identifier.citationTripodi, Tony; Epstein, Irwin; MacMurray, Carol (1970). "DILEMMAS IN EVALUATION: IMPLICATIONS FOR ADMINISTRATORS OF SOCIAL ACTION PROGRAMS." American Journal of Orthopsychiatry 40(5): 850-857. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/74595>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0002-9432en_US
dc.identifier.issn1939-0025en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/74595
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=5479272&dopt=citationen_US
dc.format.extent504720 bytes
dc.format.extent3109 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltden_US
dc.rights1970 American Orthopsychiatric Associationen_US
dc.titleDILEMMAS IN EVALUATION: IMPLICATIONS FOR ADMINISTRATORS OF SOCIAL ACTION PROGRAMSen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPsychiatryen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumThe University of Michigan School of Social Work Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.identifier.pmid5479272en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/74595/1/j.1939-0025.1970.tb01097.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1939-0025.1970.tb01097.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceAmerican Journal of Orthopsychiatryen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAndrew, G. 1967. Some observations on management problems in applied social research. Amer. Sociologist, 2: 84 – 89, 92.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBergen, B. 1965. Professional communities and the evaluation of demonstration projects in community mental health. Amer. J. Pub. Hlth. 55: 1057 – 1066.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBloom, B. 1968. An annotated bibliography 1955–68. In Comprehensive Mental Health: The Challenge of Evaluation, L. Roberts, N. Greenfield, and M. Miller, eds. Univ. of Wisconsin Press, Madison. 291 – 328.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBorgatta, E. 1961. Research problems in evaluation of health service demonstrations. Milbank Memorial Fund Quart. 44: 182 – 201.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCampbell, D. 1969. Reforms as experiments. Amer. Psychologist, 24: 409 – 429.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCaplan, G. 1968. Introduction. In Comprehensive Mental Health: The Challenge of Evaluation, L. Roberts, N. Greenfield, and M. Miller, eds. Univ. of Wisconsin Press, Madison. 3 – 14.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceClark, K. 1968. A Relevant War Against Poverty: A Study of Community Action Programs and Observable Social Change. Metropolitan Applied Research Centers, New York.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDunsmore, H. 1964. Criteria for evaluation of environmental health programs. Amer. J. Pub. Hlth. 54: 7 – 10.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEtzioni, A. 1964. Modern Organizations. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFairweather, G. 1967. Methods for Experimental Social Innovation, John Wiley & Sons, New York.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFanshel, D. (ed.). 1962. Research in Social Welfare Administration. NASW, New York.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFanshel, D. 1963. Administrative issues in the organization of research activities. Social Casework, 44: 563 – 568.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFinestone, S. 1963. Some requirements for agency-based research. Social Casework, 44: 132 – 136.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFluckiger, W. 1969. Evaluating the performance of non-profit organizations—a commentary. Mgt. Contr. 16: 5 – 6.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGans, H. 1967. Urban poverty and social planning. In The Uses of Sociology, P. Lazarsfeld, W. Sewell, and H. Wilensky, eds. Basic Books, New York. 437 – 476.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGouldner, A. 1965. Explorations in applied social science. In Applied Sociology: Opportunities and Problems, A. Gouldner and S. M. Miller, eds. Free Press, New York. 5 – 22.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHayes, S. 1959. Evaluating Development Projects. UNESCO, Place de Fontenoy, Paris, France.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHerman, M. and M. Munk 1968. Decision-Making in Poverty Programs: Case Studies from Youth-Work Agencies. Columbia Univ. Press, New York.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHerzog, E. 1959. Some Guidelines for Evaluative Research. U.S. Children's Bureau, Washington.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHyman, H. and C. Wright 1967. Evaluating social action programs. In The Uses of Sociology, P. Lazarsfeld, W. Sewell, and H. Wilensky, eds. Basic Books, New York. 741 – 782.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLawrence, D. (ed.) 1969. Antipoverty war under fire again. U.S. News and World Report, 46: 37 – 41.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLerman, P. 1968. Evaluative studies of institutions for delinquents: implications for research and social policy. Soc. Work, 13: 55 – 64.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLevine, A. 1967. Evaluating program effectiveness and efficiency. Welfare in Review, 5: 1 – 11.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLevitan, S. 1967. Antipoverty Work and Training Efforts: Goals and Reality, Policy Papers in Human Resources and Industrial Relations, No. 3. Institute of Labor and Industrial Relations, Univ. of Michigan, Ann Arbor; Wayne State Univ., Detroit.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLitwak, E. 1967. Comments on Professor Trow's paper entitled “methodological problems in the evaluation of innovation.” Paper presented at Symposium on Problems in the Evaluation of Instruction, Univ. of California, Los Angeles, December, 1967.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLoeb, M. 1968. Evaluation as accountability: a basis for resistance to planning for community mental health services. In Comprehensive Mental Health: The Challenge of Evaluation, L. Roberts, N. Greenfield, and M. Miller, eds. Univ. of Wisconsin Press, Madison. 249 – 258.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLuchterhand, E. 1967. Research and the dilemmas in developing social programs. In The Uses of Sociology, P. Lazarsfeld, W. Sewell, and H. Wilensky, eds. Basic Books, New York. 506 – 521.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMackey, R. 1969. U.S. is critical of youth corps. Detroit Free Press, October 15: 3.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference29. Office of Economic Opportunity. 1967. Head Start Child Development Programs: A Manual of Policies and Instructions, Community Action Program. Washington.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePasamanick, B. 1968. An evaluation of an experimental community mental health paradigm: some implications for both program and evaluation. In Comprehensive Mental Health: The Challenge of Evaluation, L. Roberts, N. Greenfield, and M. Miller, eds. Univ. of Wisconsin Press, Madison. 221 – 236.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRodman, H., and R. Kolodny 1965. Organizational strains in the researcher-practitioner relationship. In Applied Sociology: Opportunities and Problems, A. Gouldner and S. M. Miller, eds. Free Press, New York.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchulberg, H. and F. Baker 1968. Program evaluation models and the implementation of research findings. Amer. J. Pub. Hlth. 58: 1248 – 1255.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSherwood, C. 1967. Issues in measuring results of social action programs. Welfare in Review, 5: 13 – 17.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStein, H. 1962. The study of organizational effectiveness. In Research in Social Welfare Administration, D. Fanshel, ed. NASW, New York.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStein, H., G. Hougham, and S. Zalba 1968. Assessing social agency effectiveness: a goal model. Welfare in Review, 6: 13 – 18.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSuchman, E. 1967. Evaluative Research: Principles and Practice in Public Service and Social Action Programs. Russell Sage Foundation, New York.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
j.1939-0025.1970.tb01097.x.pdf
Size:
492.8KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.