Show simple item record

Marginal Adaptation and Color Stability of Four Provisional Materials

dc.contributor.authorGivens, Edward J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorNeiva, Gisele F.en_US
dc.contributor.authorYaman, Peteren_US
dc.contributor.authorDennison, Joseph B.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-01T21:45:03Z
dc.date.available2010-06-01T21:45:03Z
dc.date.issued2008-02en_US
dc.identifier.citationGivens, Edward J.; Neiva, Gisele; Yaman, Peter; Dennison, Joseph B. (2008). "Marginal Adaptation and Color Stability of Four Provisional Materials." Journal of Prosthodontics 17(2): 97-101. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/74793>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1059-941Xen_US
dc.identifier.issn1532-849Xen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/74793
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=17971123&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose:  A number of provisional restorative materials exist on the market. This study tested marginal fit and color stability of three provisional restorative materials and a control. Materials and Methods:  Two auto-cure materials, Protemp Garant and Integrity, and one dual-cure material, Luxatemp Solar, were tested against SNAP, a polyethyl methacrylate control. A maxillary right central incisor ivorine tooth was prepared for a full coverage all-ceramic crown, with a 1.5-mm chamfer margin. Four points were engraved at a point 1 mm below the facial, lingual, mesial, and distal margins, and replicas (n = 40) were produced by the manufacturer. Provisional crowns (n = 10 × 4) were fabricated on the individual replicas using a polyethylene coping template. The crowns were trimmed under magnification using an acrylic bur. The distance from the crown margins to a point tangent to the engraved markings was measured under 10× magnification and recorded. For color stability, 10-mm diameter × 2-mm thick discs (n = 10 × 4) were fabricated and immersed cyclically in tea for 1 week in a Tucillo/Nielson apparatus. Color measurements were recorded for each specimen at baseline and after staining. ΔE values were calculated to determine the extent of the color change. Results:  The means of the four marginal discrepancy measurements for each specimen were analyzed using a 1-way ANOVA and Tukey post-hoc comparison. Luxatemp Solar had statistically significant marginal discrepancy (319 Μm, p < 0.05) when compared to the other provisional materials. A significant color change (ΔE = 4.33, p < 0.05) was found for Protemp Garant. Conclusion:  The dual-cure temporary material (Luxatemp Solar) exhibited significantly more discrepancy at the margin than the auto-cure bis-acryl materials or acrylic control. Protemp Garant exhibited a clinically noticeable change in shade after 1 week in staining solution, whereas the other materials did not exhibit a clinically noticeable change. Clinical Implications:  Provisional crowns fabricated from SNAP, Protemp Garant, and Integrity exhibited similarly low marginal discrepancy. SNAP, Luxatemp Solar, and Integrity did not demonstrate a clinically detectable change in shade after 1 week in a staining solution.en_US
dc.format.extent219741 bytes
dc.format.extent3109 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Incen_US
dc.rights2007 by The American College of Prosthodontistsen_US
dc.subject.otherMarginal Fiten_US
dc.subject.otherColor Stabilityen_US
dc.subject.otherProvisional Materialsen_US
dc.titleMarginal Adaptation and Color Stability of Four Provisional Materialsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelDentistryen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumSchool of Dentistry, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MIen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherUnited States Navyen_US
dc.identifier.pmid17971123en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/74793/1/j.1532-849X.2007.00256.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1532-849X.2007.00256.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Prosthodonticsen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChristensen GJ: Provisional restorations for fixed prosthodontics. J Am Dent Assoc 1996; 127: 249 - 252en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSmall BW: Pre-treatment wax-ups and provisionals for restorative dentistry. Gen Dent 2005; 53: 98 - 100en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHernandez EP, Oshida Y, Platt JA, et al: Mechanical properties of four methylmethacrylate-based resins for provisional fixed restorations. Biomed Mater Eng 2004; 14: 107 - 122en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKaiser DA: Accurate acrylic resin temporary restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1978; 39: 158 - 161en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDiaz-Arnold AM, Dunne JT, Jones AH: Microhardness of provisional fixed prosthodontic materials. J Prosthet Dent 1999; 82: 525 - 528en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceIreland MF, Dixon DL, Breeding LC, et al: In vitro mechanical property comparison of four resins used for fabrication of provisional fixed restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1998; 80: 158 - 162en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYoung HM, Smith CT, Morton D: Comparative in vitro evaluation of two provisional restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent 2001; 85: 129 - 132en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDumbrigue HB: Composite indirect-direct method for fabricating multiple-unit provisional restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2003; 89: 86 - 88en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMiller SD: The anterior fixed provisional restoration: a direct method. J Prosthet Dent 1983; 50: 516 - 519en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFehling AW, Neitzke C: A direct provisional restoration for decreased occlusal wear and improved marginal integrity: a hybrid technique. J Prosthodont 1994; 3: 256 - 260en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSmall BW: Indirect provisional restorations. Gen Dent 1999; 47: 140 - 142en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBennani V: Fabrication of an indirect-direct provisional fixed partial denture. J Prosthet Dent 2000; 84: 364 - 365en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKoumjian JH, Holmes JB: Marginal accuracy of provisional restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent 1990; 63: 639 - 642en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTjan AHL, Tjan AH, Grant BE: Marginal accuracy of temporary composite crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1987; 58: 417 - 420en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYannikakis SA, Zissis AJ, Polyzois GL, et al: Color stability of provisional resin restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent 1998; 80: 533 - 539.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSham AS, Chu FC, Chai J, et al: Color stability of provisional prosthodontic materials. J Prosthet Dent 2004; 91: 447 - 452en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHaselton DR, Diaz-Arnold AM, Dawson DV: Color stability of provisional crown and fixed partial denture resins. J Prosthet Dent 2005; 93: 70 - 75en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDoray PG, Wang X, Powers JM, et al: Accelerated aging affects color stability of provisional restorative materials. J Prosthodont 1997; 6: 183 - 188en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSulieman M, Addy M, Rees JS: Development and evaluation of a method in vitro to study the effectiveness of tooth bleaching. J Dent 2003; 31: 415 - 422en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDubois RJ, Kyriakakis P, Weiner S, et al: Effects of occlusal loading and thermocycling on the marginal gaps of lightpolymerized and autopolymerized resin provisional crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1999; 82: 161 - 166en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKhokhar ZA, Razzoog ME, Yaman P: Color stability of restorative resins. Quintessence Int 1991; 22: 733 - 737en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceO'Brien WJ: Dental Materials and Their Selection ( ed 3 ). Chicago, IL, Quintessence, 2002, p. 28.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHarler CR: Tea Manufacture. London, Oxford United Press, 1963, pp. 13 - 22.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePearson D: The Chemical Analysis of Foods ( ed 7 ). London, Churchill Livingston, 1976.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.