View Item 

Show simple item record

DISCUSSION PAPER: REFLECTIONS ON TECHNOLOGY IN LEXICOGRAPHY

dc.contributor.authorBailey, Richard W.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-01T21:46:06Z
dc.date.available2010-06-01T21:46:06Z
dc.date.issued1973-06en_US
dc.identifier.citationBailey, Richard W. (1973). "DISCUSSION PAPER: REFLECTIONS ON TECHNOLOGY IN LEXICOGRAPHY." Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 211(1 Lexicography in English ): 293-297. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/74810>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0077-8923en_US
dc.identifier.issn1749-6632en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/74810
dc.format.extent343008 bytes
dc.format.extent3109 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltden_US
dc.rights1973 The New York Academy of Sciencesen_US
dc.titleDISCUSSION PAPER: REFLECTIONS ON TECHNOLOGY IN LEXICOGRAPHYen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelScience (General)en_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of English Language and Literature The University of Michigan Ann Arbor, Michigan 48104en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/74810/1/j.1749-6632.1973.tb49508.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1749-6632.1973.tb49508.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciencesen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRichards, I. A. 1955. Speculative Instruments: 18. Harvest. New York, N.Y..en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMurray, J. A. H. et al 1933. General explanation. Oxford English Dictionary. 1: xxvii.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSpitzer, L. 1948. Linguistics and Literary History: 2 – 3. Princeton Univ. Press. Princeton, N.Y..en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFries, C. C. et al 1932. The Early Modern English Dictionary. Publ. Mod. Lang. Assoc.. 47: 897.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSmith, R. N. 1972. Interactive Lexical Updating. Computers and the Humanities. 6: 137 – 45.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMurray, I. A. H. et al 1933. Historical introduction. Oxford English Dictionary. 1: xv.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBailey, R. W. & J. L. Robinson. 1968–69. The University of Michigan Early Modern English Dictionary Project. Shakespeare Research Opportunities. 4: 120 – 121. Ann Arbor, Mich.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBailey, R. W. & J. L. Robinson. 1970. Computers and dictionaries. In Computers and Old English Concordances. A. Cameron, R. Frank, & J. Leyerle, Eds.: 94 – 102. Univ. of Toronto Press. Toronto, Canada.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBailey, R. W. & I. L. Robinson. The computer in lexicography. In Hans Kurath Festschrift. J. Reidy & H. Scholler, Eds. Forthcoming.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBailey, R. W. Research dictionaries. Amer. Speech. Forthcoming.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRobinson, I. L. & R. W. Bailey. 1973. Computer-produced microfilm in lexicography: toward a dictionary of Early Modern English. In The Computer and Literary Studies. A. J. Aitken, R. W. Bailey & N. Hamilton-Smith, Eds.: 3 – 14. Edinburgh Univ. Press. Edinburgh, Scotland.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVenezky, R. L. 1969. Storage, retrieval, and editing of information for a dictionary. Amer. Documentation. 19: 71 – 79.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceReitman, W. A., R. B. Roberts, R. W. Sauvain, D. D. Wheeler & W. Linn. 1969. Autonote: A personal information storage and retrieval system. Proc. 24th Nat. Conf. ACM: 67 – 76. ACM. New York, N.Y..en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference14. Information on this project is disseminated through the limited-circulation newsletter, Studies in Early Modern English. Correspondence about the project should be directed to Prof. Bror Danielsson, Engelska Institutionen, Stockholm University, Stockholm 50, Sweden.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
j.1749-6632.1973.tb49508.x.pdf
Size:
334.9KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.