Influence of Graft Type on Outcomes After Pediatric Liver Transplantation
dc.contributor.author | Roberts, John P. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Hulbert-Shearon, Tempie E. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Merion, Robert M. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Wolfe, Robert A. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Port, Friedrich K. | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-06-01T21:52:03Z | |
dc.date.available | 2010-06-01T21:52:03Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2004-03 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Roberts, John P.; Hulbert-Shearon, Tempie E.; Merion, Robert M.; Wolfe, Robert A.; Port, Friedrich K. (2004). "Influence of Graft Type on Outcomes After Pediatric Liver Transplantation." American Journal of Transplantation 4(3): 373-377. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/74904> | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1600-6135 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1600-6143 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/74904 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=14961989&dopt=citation | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 164476 bytes | |
dc.format.extent | 3109 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.format.mimetype | text/plain | |
dc.publisher | Munksgaard International Publishers | en_US |
dc.publisher | Blackwell Publishing Ltd | en_US |
dc.rights | Blackwell Munksgaard 2004 | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Deceased Donor | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Graft Survival | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Liver Transplantation | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Living Donor | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Patient Survival | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Pediatric Transplantation | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Split Liver | en_US |
dc.subject.other | SRTR | en_US |
dc.title | Influence of Graft Type on Outcomes After Pediatric Liver Transplantation | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Medicine (General) | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Health Sciences | en_US |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer Reviewed | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | University Renal Research and Education Association, Ann Arbor, MI | en_US |
dc.identifier.pmid | 14961989 | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/74904/1/j.1600-6143.2004.00359.x.pdf | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2004.00359.x | en_US |
dc.identifier.source | American Journal of Transplantation | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Malago M, Hertl M, Testa G, Rogiers X, Broelsch CE. Split-liver transplantation: future use of scarce donor organs. World J Surg 2002; 26: 275 – 282. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Testa G, Malago M, Broelsch CE. From living related to in-situ split liver transplantation: how to reduce waiting-list mortality. Pediatr Transplant 2001; 5: 16 – 20. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Otte JB, de Ville de Goyet J, Reding R et al. Pediatric liver transplantation: from the full-size liver graft to reduced, split, and living related liver transplantation. Pediatr Surg Int 1998; 13: 308 – 318. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | 4. Annual Report of the U.S. Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network and the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. Transplant Data 1992–2001. HHS/HRSA/DOT, UNOS, URREA. Table 9.3, p. 489. Available at: http://www.ustransplant.org | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Farmer DG, Yersiz H, Ghobrial RM et al. Early graft function after pediatric liver transplantation: comparison between in situ split liver grafts and living-related liver grafts. Transplantation 2001; 802: 795. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Broering DC, Mueller L, Ganschow R et al. Is there still a need for living-related liver transplantation in children ? Ann Surg 2001; 234: 713 – 721 ( discussion 721–2 ). | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Reding R, de Goyet J de V, Delbeke I et al. Pediatric liver transplantation with cadaveric or living related donors: comparative results in 90 elective recipients of primary grafts. J Pediatr 1999; 134: 280 – 286. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Renz JF, de Roos M, Rosenthal P et al. Posttransplantation growth in pediatric liver recipients. Liver Transpl 2001; 7: 1040 – 1055. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | 9. SPLIT Research Group. Studies of Pediatric Liver Transplantation (SPLIT): year 2000 outcomes. Transplantation 2000; 72: 463 – 476. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Langham MR Jr, Tzakis AG, Gonzalez-Peralta R et al. Graft survival in pediatric liver transplantation. J Pediatr Surg 2001; 36: 1205 – 1209. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | McDiarmid SV, Anand R, Lindblad AS. Development of a pediatric end-stage liver disease score to predict poor outcome in children awaiting liver transplantation. Transplantation 2002; 74: 173 – 181. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Emond JC, Renz JF, Ferrell LD et al. Functional analysis of grafts from living donors. Implications for the treatment of older recipients. Ann Surg 1996; 224: 544 – 552 ( discussion 552–4 ). | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Kiuchi T, Kasahara M, Uryuhara K et al. Impact of graft size mismatching on graft prognosis in liver transplantation from living donors. Transplantation 1999; 67: 321 – 327. | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Interdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.