The Seven Deadly Sins of Communication Research
dc.contributor.author | Neuman, W. Russell | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Davidson, Roei | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Joo, Sung-Hee | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Park, Yong Jin | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Williams, Ann E. | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-06-01T21:55:17Z | |
dc.date.available | 2010-06-01T21:55:17Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2008-06 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Neuman, W. Russell; Davidson, Roei; Joo, Sung-Hee; Park, Yong Jin; Williams, Ann E. (2008). "The Seven Deadly Sins of Communication Research." Journal of Communication 58(2): 220-237. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/74955> | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0021-9916 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1460-2466 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/74955 | |
dc.format.extent | 334113 bytes | |
dc.format.extent | 3109 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.format.mimetype | text/plain | |
dc.publisher | Blackwell Publishing Inc | en_US |
dc.rights | © 2008 International Communication Association | en_US |
dc.title | The Seven Deadly Sins of Communication Research | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Communications | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Social Sciences | en_US |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer Reviewed | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | 1 Department of Communication Studies, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48104 | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | 2 Department of Communication, University of Haifa, Haifa 31905, Israel | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | 3 Department of Communication, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30303 | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/74955/1/j.1460-2466.2008.00382.x.pdf | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00382.x | en_US |
dc.identifier.source | Journal of Communication | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Armstrong, J. S. ( 1980 ). Unintelligible management research and academic prestige. Interfaces, 10, 80 – 86. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Armstrong, J. S. ( 1997 ). Peer review for journals: Evidence on quality control, fairness, and innovation. Science and Engineering Ethics, 3, 63 – 84. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Bakanic, V., McPhail, C., & Simon, R. J. ( 1987 ). The manuscript review and decision-making process. American Sociological Review, 52, 631 – 642. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Bakanic, V., McPhail, C., & Simon, R. J. ( 1989 ). Mixed messages: Referees’ comments on the manuscripts they review. Sociological Quarterly, 30, 639 – 654. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Beniger, J. R. ( 1990 ). Who are the most important theorists of communication? Communication Research, 17, 698 – 715. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Beniger, J. R. ( 1993 ). Communication—Embrace the subject, not the field. Journal of Communication, 43 ( 3 ), 18 – 25. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Bonjean, C., & Hullum, J. ( 1978 ). Reasons for journal rejection: An analysis of 600 manuscripts. PS: Political Science and Politics, 11, 480 – 483. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Braxton, J. M., & Hargens, L. L. ( 1996 ). Variation among academic disciplines: Analytical frameworks and research. In J. C. Smart ( Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research ( Vol. 11, pp. 1 – 46 ). Boston: Kluwer Academic. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Bryant, J., & Miron, D. ( 2004 ). Theory and research in mass communication. Journal of Communication, 54, 662 – 704. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Bunz, U. ( 2005 ). Publish or perish: A limited author analysis of ICA and NCA journals. Journal of Communication, 55, 703 – 720. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Campanario, J. M. ( 1998 ). Peer review for journals as it stands today—Part 1. Science Communication, 19, 181 – 211. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Chew, F. S. ( 1991 ). Fate of manuscripts rejected for publication in the AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology, 156, 627 – 632. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Cicchetti, D. V. ( 1991 ). The reliability of peer review for manuscript and grant submissions: A cross-disciplinary investigation. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 14, 119 – 186. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Cole, J. R., & Cole, S. ( 1981 ). Peer review in the National Science Foundation. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Cole, S., Rubin, L., & Cole, J. R. ( 1977 ). Peer review and the support of science. Scientific American, 237 ( 4 ), 34 – 41. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Craig, R. T. ( 1999 ). Communication theory as a field. Communication Theory, 9, 119 – 161. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Donsbach, W. ( 2006 ). The identity of communication research. Journal of Communication, 56, 437 – 448. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Eisenberg, N., Thompson, M. S., Augir, S., & Stanley, E. H. ( 2002 ). ‘Getting in’ revisited: An analysis of manuscript characteristics, reviewers’ ratings, and acceptance of manuscripts in Psychological Bulletin. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 997 – 1004. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Fiske, D. W., & Fogg, L. ( 1990 ). But the reviewers are making different criticisms of my paper! American Psychologist, 45, 591 – 598. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Gerbner, G. ( Ed.). ( 1983a ). Journal of Communication, 33 ( 3 ) Ferment in the field [Special issue]. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Gerbner, G. ( 1983b ). The importance of being critical—In one’s own fashion. Journal of Communication, 33 ( 3 ), 355 – 362. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Guetzkow, H. ( 1950 ). Unitizing and categorizing problems in coding qualitative data. Journal of Clinical Psychology 6, 47 – 58. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Guetzkow, J., Lamont, M., & Mallard, G. ( 2004 ). What is originality in the humanities and the social sciences? American Sociological Review, 69, 190 – 212. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Hackett, E. J., & Chubin, D. E. ( 2003 ). Peer review for the 21st century: Applications to education research. Washington, DC: National Research Council. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Hargens, L. L. ( 1988 ). Scholarly consensus and journal rejection rates. American Sociological Review, 53, 139 – 151. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Harnard, S. ( 1979 ). Creative disagreement. Sciences, 19, 18 – 20. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Jensen, K. B. ( 2000 ). On the edge: A meta-analysis of the state of media and communication research. Nordicom Review, 21 ( 2 ), 23 – 30. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Katz, E., Peters, J. D., Liebes, T., & Orloff, A. ( Eds.). ( 2003 ). Canonic texts in media research: Are there any? Should there be? How about these? Cambridge, UK: Polity Press. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Lamont, M., & Mallard, G. ( 2005 ). Peer evaluation in the social sciences and the humanities compared: The United States, the United Kingdom, and France. Ottawa, Canada: Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Lamont, M., & Molnar, V. ( 2002 ). The study of boundaries in the social sciences. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 167 – 195. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Levy, M., & Gurevitch, M. ( Eds.). ( 1993 ). Journal of Communication, 43 ( 3 & 4 ) [ Special issue ]. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Lin, L. I.-K. ( 1989 ). A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. Biometrics, 45, 255 – 268. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Lin, Y., & Kaid, L. L. ( 2000 ). Fragmentation of the intellectual structure of political communication study: Some empirical evidence. Scientometrics, 47, 143 – 164. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Littlejohn, S. W., & Foss, K. A. ( 2005 ). Theories of human communication ( 8th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Livingstone, S. ( 1993 ). The rise and fall of audience research: An old story with a new ending. Journal of Communication, 43 ( 3 ), 5 – 12. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Lombard, M., Snyder-Duch, J., & Bracken, C. C. ( 2002 ). Content analysis in mass communication: Assessment and reporting of intercoder reliability. Human Communication Research, 28, 587 – 604. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Merton, R. K. ( 1968 ). Social theory and social structure. New York: The Free Press. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Peters, D. P., & Ceci, S. J. ( 1982 ). Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 5, 187 – 195. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Petty, R. E., Fleming, M. A., & Fabrigar, L. R. ( 1999 ). The review process at PSPB: Correlates of interreviewer agreement and manuscript acceptance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 188 – 203. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Pool, I. d.S. ( 1983 ). What ferment? A challenge for empirical research. Journal of Communication, 33 ( 3 ), 258 – 261. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Rice, R. E., Borgman, C. L., & Reeves, B. ( 1988 ). Citation networks of communication journals, 1977-1985. Human Communication Research, 15 ( 2 ), 256 – 283. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Rogers, E. M., & Chaffee, S. H. ( 1993 ). The past and future of communication study: Convergence or divergence. Journal of Communication, 43 ( 3 ), 125 – 131. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Scott, W. ( 1970 ). Inter-referee agreement on some characteristics of manuscripts submitted to the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. American Psychologist, 29, 698 – 702. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Straub, D., Ang, S., & Evaristo, R. ( 1994 ). Normative standards for MIS research. Data Base, 25 ( 1 ), 21 – 34. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Swanson, D. ( 1993 ). Fragmentation, the field and the future. Journal of Communication, 43, 163 – 172. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Wolff, W. M. ( 1970 ). A study of criteria for journal manuscripts. American Psychologist, 25, 636 – 669. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Zuckerman, H., & Merton, R. K. ( 1971 ). Patterns of evaluation in science: Institutionalisation, structure and functions of the referee system. Minerva, 9 ( 1 ), 66 – 100. | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Interdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.