View Item 

Show simple item record

Innovations in the Assessment of Transplant Center Performance: Implications for Quality Improvement
dc.contributor.authorAxelrod, David A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKalbfleisch, John D.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSun, R. J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorGuidinger, Mary K.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBiswas, Pinakien_US
dc.contributor.authorLevine, Gregory N.en_US
dc.contributor.authorArrington, C. J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMerion, Robert M.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-01T21:56:37Z
dc.date.available2010-06-01T21:56:37Z
dc.date.issued2009-04en_US
dc.identifier.citationAxelrod, D. A.; Kalbfleisch, J. D.; Sun, R. J.; Guidinger, M. K.; Biswas, P.; Levine, G. N.; Arrington, C. J.; Merion, R. M. (2009). "Innovations in the Assessment of Transplant Center Performance: Implications for Quality Improvement." American Journal of Transplantation 9(4p2 The 2008 SRTR Report on the State of Transplantation ): 959-969. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/74976>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1600-6135en_US
dc.identifier.issn1600-6143en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/74976
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=19341418&dopt=citationen_US
dc.format.extent148525 bytes
dc.format.extent3109 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Incen_US
dc.rights© 2009 American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeonsen_US
dc.subject.otherQuality Assessmenten_US
dc.subject.otherRisk Assessment Modelingen_US
dc.subject.otherSRTR/OPTNen_US
dc.subject.otherStatistical Methodologyen_US
dc.titleInnovations in the Assessment of Transplant Center Performance: Implications for Quality Improvementen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMedicine (General)en_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MIen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MIen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NHen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherScientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, Ann Arbor, MIen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherArbor Research Collaborative for Health, Ann Arbor, MIen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherGlobal Medical Research and Development, Pfizer Inc., New York, NYen_US
dc.identifier.pmid19341418en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/74976/1/j.1600-6143.2009.02570.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02570.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceAmerican Journal of Transplantationen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShewart WA. Economic control of quality manufactured produce. New York: Van Nostrand, 1931.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePage E. Continuous inspection schemes. Biometrika 1954; 41: 100 – 114.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencede Saintonge DM, Vere Dw. Why don't doctors use CUSUMs? Lancet 1974; 1: 120 – 121.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWohl H. The cusum plot: Its utility in the analysis of clinical data. N Engl J Med 1977; 296: 1044 – 1045.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePoloniecki J, Sismanidis C, Bland M. Jones P. Retrospective cohort study of false alarm rates associated with a series of heart operations: The case for hospital mortality monitoring groups. BMJ 2004; 328: 375 – 378.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference6.  Committee on Quality of Health Care in America, Institute of Medicine. Crossing the quality chasm: A new health system for the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2001.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBiau D, Resche-Rigon M, Godiris-Petit G, Nizard R, Procher R. Quality control of surgical and interventional procedures: A review of the CUSUM. Qual Saf Health Care 2007; 16: 203 – 207.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGrigg O, Farewell V. An overview of risk-adjusted charts. J R Statist Soc 2004; A167: 523 – 539en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSpiegelhalter DJ, Grigg OA, Kinsman R, Treasure T. Sequential probability ratio tests (SPRTS) for monitoring risk-adjusted outcomes. Int J Qual Hlth Care 2003; 15: 1 – 7.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSteiner S, Cook R, Farewell V et al. Monitoring surgical performance using risk-adjusted cumulative sum charts. Biostatistics 2000; 1: 441 – 452.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAxelrod DA, Guidinger MK, Metzger RA, Wiesner RH, Webb RL, Merion RM. Transplant center quality assessment using a continuously updatable, risk-adjusted technique (CUSUM). Am J Transplant 2006; 6: 313 – 323.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBiswas P, Kalbfleisch JD. A risk-adjusted CUSUM in continuous time based on the Cox model. Stat Med 2008; 27 ( 17 ): 3382 – 3406.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSteiner S, Cook R, Farewell V. Risk adjusted monitoring of surgical outcomes. Med Decis Making 2001; 21: 163 – 169.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGrigg OA, Farewell VT, Spiegelhaler DJ. Use of risk-adjusted CUSUM and RSPRTcharts for monitoring in medical contexts. Stat Methods Med Res 2003; 12: 147 – 170.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBarnard GA. Control charts and stochastic processes. J Roy Stat Soc Ser B 1959; 21: 239 – 271.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBarnard GA. Sampling inspection and statistical decisions. J R Stat Soc 1954; B ( 16 ): 151 – 174.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDickinson DM, Shearon TH, O’Keefe J et al. The 2005 SRTR report on the state of transplantation. SRTR center-specific reporting tools: Posttransplant outcomes. Am J Transplant 2006; 6: 1198 – 1211.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDeLeval MR, FranÇois K, Bull C, Brawn WB, Spiegelhalter DJ. Analysis of a cluster of surgical failures. J Thor Cardvasc Surg 1994; 104: 914 – 924.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLovegrove J, Sherlaw-Johnson C, Valencia O, Treasure T, Gallivan S. Monitoring the performance of cardiac surgeons. J Oper Res Soc 1999; 50: 684 – 689.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLovegrove J, Valencia O, Treasure T, Sherlaw-Johnson C, Gallivan S. Monitoring the results of cardiac surgery by variable life-adjusted display. Lancet 1997; 350: 1128 – 1130.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePoloniecki J, Valencia O, Littlejohns P. Cumulative risk adjusted mortality chart for detecting changes in death rate: Observational study of heart surgery. Br Med J 1998; 316: 1697 – 1700.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBowles TA, Watters DA. Time to CUSUM: Simplified reporting of outcomes in colorectal surgery. ANZ J Surg 2007; 77: 587 – 591.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLerch L, Donald JC, Olivotto IA et al. Measuring surgeon performance of sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer treatment by cumulative sum analysis. Am J Surg 2007; 193 ( 5 ): 556 – 559.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBergman S, Feldman LS, Anidjar M et al. “First, do no harm”: Monitoring outcomes during the transition from open to laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy in a Canadian centre. Can J Surg 2008; 51: 103 – 110.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
j.1600-6143.2009.02570.x.pdf
Size:
145.0KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.