View Item 

Show simple item record

EVOLUTION OF IDENTITY SIGNALS: FREQUENCY-DEPENDENT BENEFITS OF DISTINCTIVE PHENOTYPES USED FOR INDIVIDUAL RECOGNITION
dc.contributor.authorSheehan, Michael J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorTibbetts, Elizabeth A.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-01T21:57:15Z
dc.date.available2010-06-01T21:57:15Z
dc.date.issued2009-12en_US
dc.identifier.citationSheehan, Michael J.; Tibbetts, Elizabeth A. (2009). "EVOLUTION OF IDENTITY SIGNALS: FREQUENCY-DEPENDENT BENEFITS OF DISTINCTIVE PHENOTYPES USED FOR INDIVIDUAL RECOGNITION." Evolution 63(12): 3106-3113. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/74986>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0014-3820en_US
dc.identifier.issn1558-5646en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/74986
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=19744121&dopt=citationen_US
dc.format.extent430100 bytes
dc.format.extent3109 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Incen_US
dc.rightsJournal compilation © 2009 The Society for the Study of Evolutionen_US
dc.subject.otherColony-level Benefiten_US
dc.subject.otherColor Polymorphismen_US
dc.subject.otherDominance Hierarchyen_US
dc.subject.otherEvolutionary Stable Strategyen_US
dc.subject.otherIndividual Recognitionen_US
dc.subject.otherPaper Waspen_US
dc.titleEVOLUTION OF IDENTITY SIGNALS: FREQUENCY-DEPENDENT BENEFITS OF DISTINCTIVE PHENOTYPES USED FOR INDIVIDUAL RECOGNITIONen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEcology and Evolutionary Biologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumEcology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, 830 N. University Avenue, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherE-mail: mic@umich.eduen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherE-mail: tibbetts@umich.eduen_US
dc.identifier.pmid19744121en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/74986/1/j.1558-5646.2009.00833.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00833.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceEvolutionen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBarnard, C. J., and T. Burk. 1979. Dominance hierarchies and the evolution of ‘individual recognition’. J. Theor. Biol. 81: 65 – 73.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBriscoe, A. D., and L. Chittka. 2001. The evolution of color vision in insects. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 46: 471 – 510.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCheney, D. L., and R. M. Seyfarth. 1999. Recognition of other individuals’ social relationships by female baboons. Anim. Behav. 58: 67 – 75.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCrowley, P. H., L. Provencher, S. Sloane, L. A. Dugatkin, B. Spohn, L. Rogers, and M. Alfieri. 1996. Evolving cooperation: the role of individual recognition. Biosystems 37: 49 – 66.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDale, J. 2006. Intraspecific variation in coloration. Pp. 36 – 86 in G. E. Hill, and K. J. McGraw, eds. Bird coloration, volume 2, function and evolution. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, MA.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDale, J., D. B. Lank, and H. K. Reeve. 2001. Signaling individual identity versus quality: a model and case studies with ruffs, queleas, and house finches. Am. Nat. 158: 75 – 86.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceD’Ettorre, P., and J. Heinze. 2005. Individual recognition in ant queens. Curr. Biol. 15: 2170 – 2174.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDreier, S., and P. D’Ettorre. 2009. Social context predicts recognition systems in ant queens. J. Evol. Biol. 22: 644 – 649.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDreier, S., J. S. van Zweden, and P. D’Ettorre. 2007. Long-term memory of individual identity in ant queens. Biol. Letts. 3: 459 – 462.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFitzpatrick, M. J., E. Feder, L. Rowe, and M. B. Sokolowski. 2007. Maintaining a behaviour polymorphism by frequency-dependent selection on a single gene. Nature 447: 210 - U215.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGigord, L. D. B., M. R. Macnair, and A. Smithson. 2001. Negative frequency-dependent selection maintains a dramatic flower color polymorphism in the rewardless orchid Dactylorhiza sambucina (L.) Soo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98: 6253 – 6255.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGrosenick, L., T. S. Clement, and R. D. Fernald. 2007. Fish can infer social rank by observation alone. Nature 445: 429 – 432.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHoekstra, H. E., R. J. Hirschmann, R. A. Bundey, P. A. Insel, and J. P. Crossland. 2006. A single amino acid mutation contributes to adaptive beach mouse color pattern. Science 313: 101 – 104.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHurst, J. L., C. E. Payne, C. M. Nevison, A. D. Marie, R. E. Humphries, D. H. L. Robertson, A. Cavaggioni, and R. J. Beynon. 2001. Individual recognition in mice mediated by major urinary proteins. Nature 414: 631 – 634.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJaeger, R. G. 1981. Dear enemy recognition and the costs of aggression between salamanders. Am. Nat. 117: 962 – 974.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJohnstone, R. A. 1997. Recognition and the evolution of distinctive signatures: when does it pay to reveal identity? Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 264: 1547 – 1553.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJouventin, P., T. Aubin, and T. Lengagne. 1999. Finding a parent in a king penguin colony: the acoustic system of individual recognition. Anim. Behav. 57: 1175 – 1183.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKanwisher, N., and G. Yovel. 2006. The fusiform face area: a cortical region specialized for the perception of faces. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 361: 2109 – 2128.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKaravanich, C., and J. Atema. 1998. Individual recognition and memory in lobster dominance. Anim. Behav. 56: 1553 – 1560.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKorb, J., and J. Heinze. 2004. Multilevel selection and social evolution of insect societies. Naturwissenschaften 91: 291 – 304.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLandis, J. R., and G. G. Koch. 1977. Measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33: 159 – 174.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLeimar, O. 2005. The evolution of phenotypic polymorphism: randomized strategies versis evolutionary branching. Am. Nat. 165: 669 – 681.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMateo, J. M. 2004. Recognition systems and biological organization: The perception component of social recognition. Ann. Zool. Fennici 41: 729 – 745.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMaynard Smith, J. 1982. Evolution and theory of games. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, England.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMaynard Smith, J., and D. Harper. 2003. Animal signals. Oxford Univ. press, New York.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMedvin, M. B., P. K. Stoddard, and M. D. Beecher. 1993. Signals for parent offspring recognition: a comparative-analysis of the begging calls of cliff swallows and barn swallows. Anim. Behav. 45: 841 – 850.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMitchell-Olds, T., J. H. Willis, and D. B. Goldstein. 2007. Which evolutionary processes influence natural genetic variation for phenotypic traits? Nat. Rev. Genet. 8: 845 – 856.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNosil, P. 2006. Frequency-dependent selection: when being different makes you not stand out. Curr. Biol. 16: R806 – R808.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOlendorf, R., F. H. Rodd, D. Punzalan, A. E. Houde, C. Hurt, D. N. Reznick, and K. A. Hughes. 2006. Frequency-dependent survival in natural guppy populations. Nature 441: 633 – 636.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePaz-y-Mino, G., A. B. Bond, A. C. Kamil, and R. P. Balda. 2004. Pinyon jays use transitive inference to predict social dominance. Nature 430: 778 – 781.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceQueller, D. C., F. Zacchi, R. Cervo, S. Turillazzi, M. T. Henshaw, L. A. Santorelli, and J. E. Strassmann. 2000. Unrelated helpers in a social insect. Nature 405: 784 – 787.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceReeve, H. K. 1991. Polistes. Pp. 99 – 148 in K. G. Ross, and R. W. Matthews, eds. The social biology of wasps. Comstock, Ithaca, NY.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceReeve, H. K., and P. Nonacs. 1992. Social contracts in wasp societies. Nature 359: 823 – 825.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSeebacher, F., and R. S. Wilson. 2007. Individual recognition in crayfish ( Cherax dispar ): the roles of strength and experience in deciding aggressive encounters. Biol. Letts. 3: 471 – 474.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSheehan, M. J., and E. A. Tibbetts. 2008. Robust long-term social memories in a paper wasp. Curr. Biol. 18: R851 – R852.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSherman, P. W., H. K. Reeve, and D. W. Pfennig. 1997. Recognition Systems. Pp. 69 – 96 in J. R. Krebs and N. B. Davies, eds. Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach. Blackwell Science Ltd., Oxford.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSokal, R. R., and F. J. Rohlf. 1995. Biometry. W.H. Freeman and Company, New York.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStach, S., J. Benard, and M. Giurfa. 2004. Local-feature assembling in visual pattern recognition and generalization in honeybees. Nature 429: 758 – 761.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStrassmann, J. E., A. Fortunato, R. Cervo, S. Turillazzi, J. M. Damon, and D. C. Queller. 2004. The cost of queen loss in the social wasp Polistes dominulus (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). J. Kansas Entomol. Soc. 77: 343 – 355.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTannure-Nascimento, I. C., F. S. Nascimento, and R. Zucchi. 2008. The look of royalty: visual and odour signals of reproductive status in a paper wasp. Proc. R. Soc. B 275: 2555 – 2561.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTibbetts, E. A. 2002. Visual signals of individual identity in the wasp Polistes fuscatus. Proc. R. Soc. B 269: 1423 – 1428.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTibbetts, E. A. 2004. Complex social behaviour can select for variability in visual features: a case study in Polistes wasps. Proc. R. Soc. B 271: 1955 – 1960.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTibbetts, E. A., and T. R. Curtis. 2007. Rearing conditions influence quality signals but not individual identity signals in Polistes wasps. Behav. Ecol. 18: 602 – 607.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTibbetts, E. A., and J. Dale. 2004. A socially enforced signal of quality in a paper wasp. Nature 432: 218 – 222.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTibbetts, E. A., and J. Dale. 2007. Individual recognition: it is good to be different. Trends Ecol. Evol. 22: 529 – 537.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTibbetts, E. A., and R. Lindsay. 2008. Visual signals of status and rival assessment in Polistes dominulus paper wasps. Biol. Letts. 4: 237 – 239.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTibbetts, E. A., and H. K. Reeve. 2000. Aggression and resource sharing among foundresses in the social wasp Polistes dominulus: testing transactional theories of conflict. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 48: 344 – 352.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTibbetts, E. A., M. J. Sheehan, and J. Dale. 2008. A testable definition of individual recognition. Trends Ecol. Evol. 23: 356 – 356.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWeiner, S. A., W. A. Woods, and P. T. Starks. 2009. The energetic costs of stereotyped behavior in the paper wasp, Polistes dominulus. Naturwissenschaften 96: 297 – 302.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWest-Eberhard, M. J. 1969. The social biology of polistine wasps. Museum of Zoology, Univ. of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYeaman, S., and A. Jarvis. 2006. Regional heterogeneity and gene flow maintain variance in a quantitative trait within populations of lodgepole pine. Proc. R. Soc. B 273: 1587 – 1593.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZanette, L., and J. Field. 2009. Cues, concessions, and inheritance: dominance hierarchies in the paper wasp Polistes dominulus. Behav. Ecol. 20: 773 – 780.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZhang, X. S., and W. G. Hill. 2005. Genetic variability under mutation selection balance. Trends Ecol. Evol. 20: 468 – 470.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
j.1558-5646.2009.00833.x.pdf
Size:
420.0KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.