Psychophysical Measurement of 6-n-Propylthiouracil (PROP) Taste Perception a
Lucchina, Laurie A.; Curtis, Otis F. V; Putnam, Peter; Drewnowski, Adam; Prutkin, Jordan M.; Bartoshuk, Linda M.
1998-11
Citation
LUCCHINA, LAURIE A.; CURTIS V, OTIS F.; PUTNAM, PETER; DREWNOWSKI, ADAM; PRUTKIN, JORDAN M.; BARTOSHUK, LINDA M. (1998). "Psychophysical Measurement of 6-n-Propylthiouracil (PROP) Taste Perception a ." Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 855(1 OLFACTION AND TASTE XII: AN INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ): 816-819. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/74993>
Abstract
The ability to taste 6- n -propylthiouracil (PROP) is genetically determined. PROP tastes moderately bitter to 'medium tasters' (MT), intensely bitter to 'supertasters' (ST), and tasteless to 'nontasters' (NT). The psychophysical method used to characterize PROP status should capture the entire range of perception, while minimizing context, ceiling and other effects. Magnitude estimation successfully captures the variability in PROP perception, but requires normalization and may be difficult to conduct in industrial settings. Two labeled scales were tested as part of three separate studies (S1, S2 and S3) to measure perceived intensity of PROP and sweeteners. All studies included reportedly healthy volunteers aged 21-62 years recruited at Cultor Food Science in Groton, CT. In S1 [ n = 163 (55 males, 108 females)], subjects rated perceived intensity of PROP-saturated paper and sucrose (1.0 M) on the Labeled Magnitude (Green) Scale (LMS) [labeled line with descriptors (no taste-strongest imaginable)]. In S2 [ n = 152 (49 males, 103 females)], subjects rated perceived intensity of sucrose (1.0 M) and PROP solutions (0.001 M,0.0032 M) on the LMS. In S3 [ n = 136 (48 males, 88 females)], subjects rated perceived intensity of sucrose (1.0 M) and PROP solutions (0.001 M, 0.0032 M) on a 9-point category scale (1 = not al all; 9 = extremely). In all experiments, water rinses were included between each tastant and PROP was the final stimulus. Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics, regression analysis, and ANOVA. In S1 and S2, those with higher PROP perception perceived sucrose more intensely [(S1: r = 0.32; p <0.001); (S2: r = 0.25; p <0.01)]. A higher frequency of females were ST than males. Also, the PROP effect on sweet perception was most evident in female ST. This apparent sex difference may be the result of hormonal variation associated with menstruation. As well, in S1 and S2 subjects aged 20-40 years, females had significantly greater variance among sucrose intensity ratings than males ( F = 3.66; p < 0.01), which may be due to hormonal changes with menses. The S3 results failed to show either the positive correlation between PROP and sucrose perception or the sex difference. Thus of the two labeled scales, the LMS appears to be better for assessing PROP perception, as it is continuous and also minimizes ceiling effects. Future research will extend these studies by including sucrose and high intensity sweetener concentration series.Publisher
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
ISSN
0077-8923 1749-6632
Other DOIs
PMID
9929692
Types
Article
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.