View Item 

Show simple item record

Mammography messages in popular media: implications for patient expectations and shared clinical decision-making
dc.contributor.authorDobias, Karen S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMoyer, Cheryl A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMcAchran, Sarah E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKatz, Steven J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSonnad, Seema S.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-01T21:58:27Z
dc.date.available2010-06-01T21:58:27Z
dc.date.issued2001-06-25en_US
dc.identifier.citationDobias, Karen S. ; Moyer, Cheryl A. ; McAchran, Sarah E. ; Katz, Steven J. ; Sonnad, Seema S. (2001). "Mammography messages in popular media: implications for patient expectations and shared clinical decision-making." Health Expectations 4(2): 131-139. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/75005>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1369-6513en_US
dc.identifier.issn1369-7625en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/75005
dc.format.extent160798 bytes
dc.format.extent3109 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherBlackwell Science Ltden_US
dc.rightsBlackwell Science Ltden_US
dc.subject.otherMagazinesen_US
dc.subject.otherMammographyen_US
dc.subject.otherMediaen_US
dc.subject.otherDecision-makingen_US
dc.subject.otherSocioeconomic Statusen_US
dc.titleMammography messages in popular media: implications for patient expectations and shared clinical decision-makingen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPublic Healthen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumConsortium for Health Outcomes, Innovation, and Cost-Effectiveness Studies (CHOICES), University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationum† Division of General Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationum§ Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationother† Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USAen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/75005/1/j.1369-6513.2001.00120.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1046/j.1369-6513.2001.00120.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceHealth Expectationsen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBushick B. Considerations for evaluation. In: American Organization of Nurse Executives (ed.) Patient as Partner: the Cornerstone of Community Health Improvement. Chicago, IL. American Hospital Publication, 1997: 31–44.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKanouse DE, Winkler JD, Kosecoff J et al. Changing Medical Practice Through Technology Assessment: an Evaluation of the NIH Consensus Development Program. Ann Arbor, Michigan: Association of Health Services Research and Health Administration Press, 1989: 58–65.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSimpkins JD & Brenner DJ. Mass media communication and health. In: Dervin B, Voight M (ed.) Progress in Communication Sciences. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 1984: 275–297.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLogan RA. Popularization versus secularization: Medical coverage of health. In: Wilkins L, Patterson P (eds) Risky Business: Communication Issues of Science, Risk, and Public Policy. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1991: 43–59.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWright WR. Mass media sources of medical information. Journal of Communication, 1975; 25: 171 – 173.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJohnson JD & Meischke H. Women’s preferences for cancer information from specific communication channels. American Behavioral Scientist, 1991; 34: 742 – 755.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNelkin D. Selling science. How the press covers science and technology. New York: W.H. Freeman, 1987: 33–84.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGerlach KK, Marino C, Hoffman-Goetz L. Cancer coverage in women’s magazines: What information are women receiving? Journal of Cancer Education, 1997; 12: 240 – 244.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLuker KA, Leinster SJ, Owens RG. Information needs and sources of information for women with breast cancer: a follow-up study. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 1996; 23: 487 – 495.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference10  Anonymous. Mediamark Research Magazine Audiences and Page Exposures Report. New York: Mediamark Research, Inc., 1990.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHolsti OR. Content Analysis for the Social Sciences and Humanities. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley Co., 1969.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRimer I. The mass media and the cancer patient – some views. Health Education Quarterly, 1984; 10: 95 – 101.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWitte K. The Manipulative nature of health communication research. American Behavioral Scientist, 1994; 38 (2): 285 – 293.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYows SR, Salmon CT, Hawkins RP, Love RR. Motivational and structural factors in predicting different kinds of cancer knowledge. American Behavioral Scientist, 1991; 34 (6): 727 – 741.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKreighbaum H. Public interest in science news. Science, 1959; 129: 1092 – 1095.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrodie M, Brady LA, Altman DE. Media coverage of managed care: Is there a negative bias? Health Affairs, 1998; 17: 9 – 25.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLantz PM, Zemencuk JK, Katz SJ. Is Mastectomy Over-Utilized?: A Call for a New Perspective. New Health Services Research, In press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKatz SJ, Lantz PM, Zemencuk JK. Determinants of Surgical Treatment Choice for Women with Non-invasive and Invasive Breast Cancer. Journal of the Medical Care, Submitted.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRoter DL & Hall JA. Doctors talking with patients/patients talking with doctors: Improving communication in medical visits. Westport, Conn: Auburn House, 1992.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWaitzkin H & Stoeckle JD. The communication of information about illness. Advanced Psychosomatic Medicine, 1972; 8: 180 – 215.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGemson DH, Elinson J, Messeri P. Differences in physician prevention practice patterns for white and minority patients. Journal of Communication Health, 1988; 13: 53 – 64.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMandelblatt J & Kanetsky PA. Effectiveness of interventions to enhance physician screening for breast cancer. Journal of Family Practice, 1995; 40: 162 – 171.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRimer BK. Understanding the acceptance of mammography by women. American Behavioral Medicine, 1992; 14: 197 – 203.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFox SA, Murata PJ, Stein JA. The impact of physician compliance on screening mammography for older women. Archives of Internal Medicine, 1991; 151: 50 – 56.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZapka JG, Stoddard A, Maul L, Costanza ME. Interval adherence to mammography screening guidelines. Medical Care, 1991; 29: 697 – 707.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
j.1369-6513.2001.00120.x.pdf
Size:
157.0KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.