View Item 

Show simple item record

A Prospective Evaluation of Two Defibrillation Safety Margin Techniques in Patients with Low Defibrillation Energy Requirements
dc.contributor.authorStrickberger, S. Adamen_US
dc.contributor.authorMan, K. Chingen_US
dc.contributor.authorSouza, Joseph J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorZivin, Adamen_US
dc.contributor.authorWeiss, Raulen_US
dc.contributor.authorKnight, Bradley P.en_US
dc.contributor.authorGoyal, Rajivaen_US
dc.contributor.authorDaoud, Emile G.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMorady, Freden_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-01T22:03:03Z
dc.date.available2010-06-01T22:03:03Z
dc.date.issued1998-01en_US
dc.identifier.citationSTRICKBERGER, S. ADAM; MAN, K. CHING; SOUZA, JOSEPH; ZIVIN, ADAM; WEISS, RAUL; KNIGHT, BRADLEY P.; GOYAL, RAJIVA; DAOUD, EMILE G.; MORADY, FRED (1998). "A Prospective Evaluation of Two Defibrillation Safety Margin Techniques in Patients with Low Defibrillation Energy Requirements." Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology 9(1): 41-46. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/75077>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1045-3873en_US
dc.identifier.issn1540-8167en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/75077
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=9475576&dopt=citationen_US
dc.format.extent527934 bytes
dc.format.extent3109 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltden_US
dc.rights1998 Blackwell Publishing Ltden_US
dc.subject.otherVentricular Fibrillationen_US
dc.subject.otherVentricular Defibrillationen_US
dc.subject.otherProbability of Defibrillationen_US
dc.subject.otherImplantable Cardioverter Defibrillatoren_US
dc.titleA Prospective Evaluation of Two Defibrillation Safety Margin Techniques in Patients with Low Defibrillation Energy Requirementsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelInternal Medicine and Specialtiesen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPhysiologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.identifier.pmid9475576en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/75077/1/j.1540-8167.1998.tb00865.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1540-8167.1998.tb00865.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiologyen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRattes MF, Jones DL, Sharma AD, et al: Defibrillation threshold: A simple and quantitative estimate of the ability to defibrillate. PACE 1987; 10: 70 – 77.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLehmann MH, Steinman RT, Schuger CD, et al: Defibrillation threshold testing and other practices related to AICD implantation: Do all roads lead to Rome ? PACE 1989; 12: 1530 – 1537.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJones DL, Irish WD, Klein GJ: Defibrillation efficacy: Comparison of defibrillation threshold versus dose-response curve determination. Circ Res 1991; 69: 45 – 51.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSinger I, Lang D: Defibrillation threshold: Clinical utility and therapeutic implications. PACE 1992; 15: 932 – 949.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStrickberger SA, Daoud EG, Davidson T, et al: Probability of successful defibrillation at multiples of the defibrillation energy requirement in patients with an implantable defibrillator. Circulation 1997; 96: 1525 – 1531.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcDaniel WC, Schuder JC: The cardiac ventricular defibrillation threshold: Inherent limitations in its application and interpretation. Med Instrum 1987; 21: 170 – 176.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcDaniel WC, Schuder JC: An up-down algorithm for estimation of the cardiac ventricular defibrillation threshold. Med Instrum 1988; 22: 286 – 292.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDavy JM, Fain ES, Dorian P, et al: The relationship between successful defibrillation and delivered energy in open-chest dogs: Reappraisal of the defibrillation threshold concept. Am Heart J 1987; 113: 77 – 84.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJones DL: The defibrillation threshold: A reliable method for rapid determination of defibrillation efficacy. In Estes NAM, Manolis AS, Wang PJ, eds. Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators. Marcel Dekker Inc., New York, 1994, pp. 29 – 54.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLang DJ, Ken Knight BH: Implant support devices. In Singer I, ed. Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator. Futura Publishing Company Inc., Armonk, NY, 1994, pp. 223 – 253.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMirowski M, Reid P, Winkle R, et al: Mortality in patients with implanted automatic defibrillators. Ann Intern Med 1983; 98: 585 – 588.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEcht D, Armstrong K, Schmidt P, et al: Clinical experience, complications and survival in 70 patients with the automatic implantable cardioverter/defibrillator. Circulation 1985; 71: 289 – 296.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWinkle R, Mead R, Ruder M, et al: Long-term outcome with the automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillator. J Am Coll Cardiol 1989; 13: 1353 – 1361.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNisam S, Mower M, Thomas A, et al: Patient survival comparison in three generations of automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillators: Review of 12 years, 25,000 patients. PACE 1993; 16: 174 – 178.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMoss AJ, Hall WJ, Cannom DS, et al: Improved survival with an implanted defibrillator in patients with coronary disease at high risk for ventricular arrhythmia. N Engl J Med 1996; 335: 1933 – 1940.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePinski SL, Vanerio G, Castle LW, et al: Patients with a high defibrillation threshold: Clinical characteristics, management, and outcome. Am Heart J 1991; 122: 89 – 95.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEpstein AE, Ellenbogen KA, Kirk KA, et al: Clinical characteristics and outcome of patients with high defibrillation thresholds. Circulation 1992; 86: 1206 – 1216.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAntunes ML, Spotnitz HM, Livelli FD, et al: Effect of electrophysiological testing on ejection fraction during cardioverter/defibrillator implantation. Ann Thorac Surg 1988; 45: 315 – 318.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHachenberg T, Hammel D, Mollhoff T, et al: Cardiopulmonary effects of intemal cardioverter/defibrillator implantation. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1991; 35: 626 – 630.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKeyl C, Tassani P, Kemkes B, et al: Hemodynamic changes due to intraoperative testing of the automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillator: Implications for anesthesia management. J Cardiothorac Vase Anesth 1993; 7: 442 – 447.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSteinbeck G, Dorwarth U, Mattke S, et al: Hemodynamic deterioration during ICD implant: Predictors of high risk patients. Am Heart J 1994; 127: 1064 – 1067.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMeyer J, Mollhoff T, Seifert T, et al: Cardiac output is not affected during intraoperative testing of the automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillator. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 1996; 7: 211 – 216.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTokano T, Souza J, Knight BP, et al: The effect of ventricular shocks on cardiac output. ( Abstract ) J Am Coll Cardiol, 1997; 29: 257.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
j.1540-8167.1998.tb00865.x.pdf
Size:
515.5KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.