View Item 

Show simple item record

Influence of test parameters on in vitro fracture resistance of post-endodontic restorations: a structured review
dc.contributor.authorNaumann, M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMetzdorf, G.en_US
dc.contributor.authorFokkinga, W.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWatzke, R.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSterzenbach, G.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBayne, S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorRosentritt, M.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-01T22:04:05Z
dc.date.available2010-06-01T22:04:05Z
dc.date.issued2009-04en_US
dc.identifier.citationNAUMANN, M.; METZDORF, G.; FOKKINGA, W.; WATZKE, R.; STERZENBACH, G.; BAYNE, S.; ROSENTRITT, M. (2009). "Influence of test parameters on in vitro fracture resistance of post-endodontic restorations: a structured review." Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 36(4): 299-312. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/75093>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0305-182Xen_US
dc.identifier.issn1365-2842en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/75093
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=19220719&dopt=citationen_US
dc.format.extent105430 bytes
dc.format.extent3109 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltden_US
dc.rightsJournal compilation © 2009 Blackwell Publishingen_US
dc.subject.otherChewing Simulationen_US
dc.subject.otherDynamic Loadingen_US
dc.subject.otherLinear Loadingen_US
dc.subject.otherOne-cycle Testingen_US
dc.subject.otherPosten_US
dc.subject.otherCoreen_US
dc.titleInfluence of test parameters on in vitro fracture resistance of post-endodontic restorations: a structured reviewen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelDentistryen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationum** Department of Cariology, Restorative Sciences, and Endodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationother* Department of Prosthodontics and Material Sciences, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germanyen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Prosthetic Dentistry, Center of Dentistry, Ulm, Germanyen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Prosthodontics, Geriatric Dentistry and Craniomandibular Disorder, UniversitÄtsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germanyen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Oral Function and Prosthetic Dentistry, College of Dental Science, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlandsen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDental Clinic, Research and Development, Ivoclar Vivadent AG, Schaan, Liechtensteinen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Prosthetic Dentistry, Regensburg University Medical Center, Regensburg, Germanyen_US
dc.identifier.pmid19220719en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/75093/1/j.1365-2842.2009.01940.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1365-2842.2009.01940.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Oral Rehabilitationen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCaplan DJ, Weintraub JA. Factors related to loss of root canal filled teeth. J Public Health Dent. 1997; 57: 31 – 39.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCaplan DJ, Kolker J, Rivera EM, Walton RE. Relationship between number of proximal contacts and survival of root canal treated teeth. Int Endod J. 2002; 35: 193 – 199.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBergman B, Lundquist P, Sjogren U, Sundquist G. Restorative and endodontic results after treatment with cast posts and cores. J Prosthet Dent. 1989; 61: 10 – 15.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceIqbal MK, Johansson AA, Akeel RF, Bergenholtz A, Omar R. A retrospective analysis of factors associated with the periapical status of restored, endodontically treated teeth. Int J Prosthodont. 2003; 16: 31 – 38.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHatzikyriakos AH, Reisis GI, Tsingos N. A 3-year postoperative clinical evaluation of posts and cores beneath existing crowns. J Prosthet Dent. 1992; 67: 454 – 458.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSorensen JA, Martinoff JT. Intracoronal reinforcement and coronal coverage: a study of endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1984; 51: 780 – 784.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAquilino SA, Caplan DJ. Relationship between crown placement and the survival of endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 2002; 87: 256 – 263.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMannocci F, Bertelli E, Sherriff M, Watson TF, Ford TR. Three-year clinical comparison of survival of endodontically treated teeth restored with either full cast coverage or with direct composite restoration. J Prosthet Dent. 2002; 88: 297 – 301.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDecock V, De Nayer K, De Boever JA, Dent M. 18-year longitudinal study of cantilevered fixed restorations. Int J Prosthodont. 1996; 9: 331 – 340.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEckerbom M, Magnusson T, Martinsson T. Prevalence of apical periodontitis, crowned teeth and teeth with posts in a Swedish population. Endod Dent Traumatol. 1991; 7: 214 – 220.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFerrari M, Mason PN, Goracci C, Pashley DH, Tay FR. Collagen degradation in endodontically treated teeth after clinical function. J Dent Res. 2004; 83: 414 – 419.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGutmann JL. The dentin-root complex: anatomic and biologic considerations in restoring endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1992; 67: 458 – 467.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHowe CA, McKendry DJ. Effect of endodontic access preparation on resistance to crown-root fracture. J Am Dent Assoc. 1990; 121: 712 – 715.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePanitvisai P, Messer HH. Cuspal deflection in molars in relation to endodontic and restorative procedures. J Endod. 1995; 21: 57 – 61.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFernandes AS, Dessai GS. Factors affecting the fracture resistance of post-core reconstructed teeth: a review. Int J Prosthodont. 2001; 14: 355 – 363.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFerrari M, Cagidiaco MC, Grandini S, De Sanctis M, Goracci C. Post placement affects survival of endodontically treated premolars. J Dent Res. 2007; 86: 729 – 734.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDietschi D, Duc O, Krejci I, Sadan A. Biomechanical considerations for the restoration of endodontically treated teeth: a systematic review of the literature – Part 1. Composition and micro- and macrostructure alterations. Quintessence Int. 2007; 38: 733 – 743.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStankiewicz NR, Wilson PR. The ferrule effect: a literature review. Int Endod J. 2002; 35: 575 – 581.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAssif D, Bitenski A, Pilo R, Oren E. Effect of post design on resistance to fracture of endodontically treated teeth with complete crowns. J Prosthet Dent. 1993; 69: 36 – 40.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceIsidor F, Brondum K, Ravnholt G. The influence of post length and crown ferrule length on the resistance to cyclic loading of bovine teeth with prefabricated titanium posts. Int J Prosthodont. 1999; 12: 78 – 82.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSorensen JA, Engelman MJ. Ferrule design and fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1990; 63: 529 – 536.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchwartz RS, Robbins JW. Post placement and restoration of endodontically treated teeth: a literature review. J Endod. 2004; 30: 289 – 301.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSorensen JAS, Berge H, Edelhoff D. Selection criteria for post and core materials in the restoration of endodontically treated teeth. Proc Conf Sci Crit Select Mater Techniq Clin Dent. 2001; 15: 67 – 84.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKrejci I, Lutz F. In-vitro test results of the evaluation of dental restoration systems. Correlation with in-vivo results. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed. 1990; 100: 1445 – 1449.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCormier CJ, Burns DR, Moon P. In vitro comparison of the fracture resistance and failure mode of fiber, ceramic, and conventional post systems at various stages of restoration. J Prosthodont. 2001; 10: 26 – 36.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLoney RW, Moulding MB, Ritsco RG. The effect of load angulation on fracture resistance of teeth restored with cast post and cores and crowns. Int J Prosthodont. 1995; 8: 247 – 251.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLeloup G, D’Hoore W, Bouter D, Degrange M, Vreven J. Meta-analytical review of factors involved in dentin adherence. J Dent Res. 2001; 80: 1605 – 1614.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStokes AN, Hood JA. Impact fracture characteristics of intact and crowned human central incisors. J Oral Rehabil. 1993; 20: 89 – 95.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFarik B, Munksgaard EC. Fracture strength of intact and fragment-bonded teeth at various velocities of the applied force. Eur J Oral Sci. 1999; 107: 70 – 73.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGoodis HE, Marshall GW Jr, White JM, Gee L, Hornberger B, Marshall SJ. Storage effects on dentin permeability and shear bond strengths. Dent Mater. 1993; 9: 79 – 84.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKitasako Y, Nikaido T, Tagami J. The influence of storage solution on dentin bond durability of resin cement. Dent Mater. 2000; 16: 1 – 6.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMorgano SM, Milot P. Clinical success of cast metal posts and cores. J Prosthet Dent. 1993; 70: 11 – 16.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHeydecke G, Peters MC. The restoration of endodontically treated, single-rooted teeth with cast or direct posts and cores: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2002; 87: 380 – 386.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZhi Yue L, Yu Xing Z. Effects of post-core design and ferrule on fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary central incisors. J Prosthet Dent. 2003; 89: 368 – 373.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAkkayan B. An in vitro study evaluating the effect of ferrule length on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with fiber-reinforced and zirconia dowel systems. J Prosthet Dent. 2004; 92: 155 – 162.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAkkayan B, Gulmez T. Resistance to fracture of endodontically treated teeth restored with different post systems. J Prosthet Dent. 2002; 87: 431 – 437.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHeydecke G, Butz F, Hussein A, Strub JR. Fracture strength after dynamic loading of endodontically treated teeth restored with different post-and-core systems. J Prosthet Dent. 2002; 87: 438 – 445.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKrejci I, Mueller E, Lutz F. Effects of thermocycling and occlusal force on adhesive composite crowns. J Dent Res. 1994; 73: 1228 – 1232.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGluskin AH, Radke RA, Frost SL, Watanabe LG. The mandibular incisor: rethinking guidelines for post and core design. J Endod. 1995; 21: 33 – 37.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFreeman MA, Nicholls JI, Kydd WL, Harrington GW. Leakage associated with load fatigue-induced preliminary failure of full crowns placed over three different post and core systems. J Endod. 1998; 24: 26 – 32.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKing PA, Setchell DJ. An in vitro evaluation of a prototype CFRC prefabricated post developed for the restoration of pulpless teeth. J Oral Rehabil. 1990; 17: 599 – 609.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePontius O, Hutter JW. Survival rate and fracture strength of incisors restored with different post and core systems and endodontically treated incisors without coronoradicular reinforcement. J Endod. 2002; 28: 710 – 715.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePilo R, Cardash HS, Levin E, Assif D. Effect of core stiffness on the in vitro fracture of crowned, endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 2002; 88: 302 – 306.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAl Wahadni A, Gutteridge DL. An in vitro investigation into the effects of retained coronal dentine on the strength of a tooth restored with a cemented post and partial core restoration. Int Endod J. 2002; 35: 913 – 918.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAl Hazaimeh N, Gutteridge DL. An in vitro study into the effect of the ferrule preparation on the fracture resistance of crowned teeth incorporating prefabricated post and composite core restorations. Int Endod J. 2001; 34: 40 – 46.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHeydecke G, Butz F, Strub JR. Fracture strength and survival rate of endodontically treated maxillary incisors with approximal cavities after restoration with different post and core systems: an in-vitro study. J Dent. 2001; 29: 427 – 433.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRosentritt M, Furer C, Behr M, Lang R, Handel G. Comparison of in vitro fracture strength of metallic and tooth-coloured posts and cores. J Oral Rehabil. 2000; 27: 595 – 601.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBaratieri LN, De Andrada MA, Arcari GM, Ritter AV. Influence of post placement in the fracture resistance of endodontically treated incisors veneered with direct composite. J Prosthet Dent. 2000; 84: 180 – 184.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKahn FH, Rosenberg PA, Schulman A, Pines M. Comparison of fatigue for three prefabricated threaded post systems. J Prosthet Dent. 1996; 75: 148 – 153.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePatel A, Gutteridge DL. An in vitro investigation of cast post and partial core design. J Dent. 1996; 24: 281 – 287.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCohen BI, Pagnillo MK, Condos S, Deutsch AS. Four different core materials measured for fracture strength in combination with five different designs of endodontic posts. J Prosthet Dent. 1996; 76: 487 – 495.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRosentritt M, Sikora M, Behr M, Handel G. In vitro fracture resistance and marginal adaptation of metallic and tooth-coloured post systems. J Oral Rehabil. 2004; 31: 675 – 681.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGuzy GE, Nicholls JI. In vitro comparison of intact endodontically treated teeth with and without endo-post reinforcement. J Prosthet Dent. 1979; 42: 39 – 44.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHoag EP, Dwyer TG. A comparative evaluation of three post and core techniques. J Prosthet Dent. 1982; 47: 177 – 181.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrandal JL, Nicholls JI, Harrington GW. A comparison of three restorative techniques for endodontically treated anterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1987; 58: 161 – 165.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBex RT, Parker MW, Judkins JT, Pelleu GB Jr. Effect of dentinal bonded resin post-core preparations on resistance to vertical root fracture. J Prosthet Dent. 1992; 67: 768 – 772.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSidoli GE, King PA, Setchell DJ. An in vitro evaluation of a carbon fiber-based post and core system. J Prosthet Dent. 1997; 78: 5 – 9.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSirimai S, Riis DN, Morgano SM. An in vitro study of the fracture resistance and the incidence ofvertical root fracture of pulpless teeth restored with six post-and-coresystems. J Prosthet Dent. 1999; 81: 262 – 269.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMendoza DB, Eakle WS, Kahl EA, Ho R. Root reinforcement with a resin-bonded preformed post. J Prosthet Dent. 1997; 78: 10 – 14.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHuysmans Mc, van der Varst PG, Schafer R, Peters MC, Plasschaert AJ, Soltesz U. Fatigue behavior of direct post-and-core-restored premolars. J Dent Res. 1992; 71: 1145 – 1150.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKrejci I, Duc O, Dietschi D, de Campos E. Marginal adaptation, retention and fracture resistance of adhesive composite restorations on devital teeth with and without posts. Oper Dent. 2003; 28: 127 – 135.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSaupe WA, Gluskin AH, Radke RA Jr. A comparative study of fracture resistance between morphologic dowel and cores and a resin-reinforced dowel system in the intraradicular restoration of structurally compromised roots. Quintessence Int. 1996; 27: 483 – 491.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceReagan SE, Fruits TJ, Van Brunt CL, Ward CK. Effects of cyclic loading on selected post-and-core systems. Quintessence Int. 1999; 30: 61 – 67.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMezzomo E, Massa F, Libera SD. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with two different post-and-core designs cemented with two different cements: an in vitro study. Part I. Quintessence Int. 2003; 34: 301 – 306.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCohen BD, Deutsch AS, Musikant BL. Cyclic fatigue testing of six endodontic post systems. ZWR. 1996; 105: 711 – 715.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRobbins JW, Earnest LA, Schumann SD. Fracture resistance of endodontically-treated cuspids. Am J Dent. 1993; 6: 159 – 161.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMaccari PC, Conceicao EN, Nunes MF. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with three different prefabricated esthetic posts. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2003; 15: 25 – 30.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNg CCH, al Bayat MI, Dumbrigue HB, Griggs JA, Wakefield WC. Effect of no ferrule on failure of teeth restored with bonded posts and cores. Gen Dent. 2004; 52: 143 – 146.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAttin T, Hellwig E, Hilgers R. The effect of reinforcing root posts on the susceptibility of endodontically treated teeth to fracture. Deutsch ZahnÄrztl Z. 1994; 49: 586 – 589.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKern M, Pleimes A, Strub JR. Fracture strengths of metallic and all-ceramic post-and-core restorations. Deutsch ZahnÄrztl Z. 1995; 50: 451 – 453.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDietschi D, Romelli M, Goretti A. Adaptation of adhesive posts and cores to dentin after fatigue testing. Int J Prosthodont. 1997; 10: 498 – 507.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRaygot CG, Chai J, Jameson DL. Fracture resistance and primary failure mode of endodontically treated teeth restored with a carbon fiber-reinforced resin post system in vitro. Int J Prosthodont. 2001; 14: 141 – 145.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceButz F, Lennon AM, Heydecke G, Strub JR. Survival rate and fracture strength of endodontically treated maxillary incisors with moderate defects restored with different post-and-core systems: an in vitro study. Int J Prosthodont. 2001; 14: 58 – 64.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMartinez Insua A, da Silva L, Rilo B, Santana U. Comparison of the fracture resistances of pulpless teeth restored with a cast post and core or carbon-fiber post with a composite core. J Prosthet Dent. 1998; 80: 527 – 532.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRosentritt M, Behr M, Kujat A, Sikora M, Handel G. Fracture resistance and marginal integrity of post and core restorations with all-ceramic crowns. Deutsch ZahnÄrztl Z. 2004; 59: 311 – 315.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJanssen U, HÜlsmann M. Comparative in vitro evaluation of two intraradicular post and core systems Luscent-Anchor and Perma-tex. Deutsch ZahnÄrztl Z. 2003; 58: 331 – 336.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDean JP, Jeansonne BG, Sarkar N. In vitro evaluation of a carbon fiber post. J Endod. 1998; 24: 807 – 810.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKern SB, von Fraunhofer JA, Mueninghoff LA. An in vitro comparison of two dowel and core techniques for endodontically treated molars. J Prosthet Dent. 1984; 51: 509 – 514.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKatebzadeh N, Dalton BC, Trope M. Strengthening immature teeth during and after apexification. J Endod. 1998; 24: 256 – 259.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePene JR, Nicholls JI, Harrington GW. Evaluation of fiber-composite laminate in the restoration of immature, nonvital maxillary central incisors. J Endod. 2001; 27: 18 – 22.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNewman MP, Yaman P, Dennison J, Rafter M, Billy E. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with composite posts. J Prosthet Dent. 2003; 89: 360 – 367.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGoto Y, Nicholls JI, Phillips KM, Junge T. Fatigue resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with three dowel-and-core systems. J Prosthet Dent. 2005; 93: 45 – 50.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHu Y-H, Pang L-C, Hsu C-C, Lau Y-H. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated anterior teeth restored with four post-and-core systems. Quintessence Int. 2003; 34: 349 – 353.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVolwiler RA, Nicholls JI, Harrington GW. Comparison of three core buildup materials used in conjunction with two post systems in endodontically treated anterior teeth. J Endod. 1989; 15: 355 – 361.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStrub JR, Pontius O, Koutayas S. Survival rate and fracture strength of incisors restored with different post and core systems after exposure in the artificial mouth. J Oral Rehabil. 2001; 28: 120 – 124.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMartinez-GonzÁlez A, AmigÓ-BorrÁs V, Fons-Font A, Selva-Otaolaurruchi E, Labaig-Rueda C. Response of three types of cast posts and cores to static loading. Quintessence Int. 2001; 32: 552 – 560.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMannocci F, Ferrari M, Watson TF. Intermittent loading of teeth restored using quartz fiber, carbon-quartz fiber, and zirconium dioxide ceramic root canal posts. J Adhesive Dent. 1999; 1: 153 – 158.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNaumann M, Rosentritt M, Preuss A, Dietrich T. The effect of alveolar bone loss on the load capability of restored endodontically treated teeth: a comparative in vitro study. J Dent. 2006; 34: 790 – 795.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchmitter M, Huy C, Ohlmann B, Gabbert O, Gilde H, Rammelsberg P. Fracture resistance of upper and lower incisors restored with glass fiber reinforced posts. J Endod. 2006; 32: 328 – 330.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNg CC, Dumbrigue HB, Al-Bayat MI, Griggs JA, Wakefield CW. Influence of remaining coronal tooth structure location on the fracture resistance of restored endodontically treated anterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 2006; 95: 290 – 296.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTan PL, Aquilino SA, Gratton DG, Stanford CM, Tan SC, Johnson WT, Dawson D. In vitro fracture resistance of endodontically treated central incisors with varying ferrule heights and configurations. J Prosthet Dent. 2005; 93: 331 – 336.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSahafi A, Peutzfeldt A, Ravnholt G, Asmussen E, Gotfredsen K. Resistance to cyclic loading of teeth restored with posts. Clin Oral Investig. 2005; 9: 84 – 90.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStricker EJ, Gohring TN. Influence of different posts and cores on marginal adaptation, fracture resistance, and fracture mode of composite resin crowns on human mandibular premolars. An in vitro study. J Dent. 2006; 34: 326 – 335.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFokkinga WA, Kreulen CM, Le Bell-Ronnlof AM, Lassila LV, Vallittu PK, Creugers NH. In vitro fracture behavior of maxillary premolars with metal crowns and several post-and-core systems. Eur J Oral Sci. 2006; 114: 250 – 256.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMezzomo E, Massa F, Suzuki RM. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with 2 different post-and-core designs fixed with 2 different luting cements: an in vitro study. Part II. Quintessence Int. 2006; 37: 477 – 484.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFriedel W, Kern M. Fracture strength of teeth restored with all-ceramic posts and cores. Quintessence Int. 2006; 37: 289 – 295.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAbdul Salam SN, Banerjee A, Mannocci F, Pilecki P, Watson TF. Cyclic loading of endodontically treated teeth restored with glass fibre and titanium alloy posts: fracture resistance and failure modes. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2006; 14: 98 – 104.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGrieznis L, Apse P, Soboleva U. The effect of 2 different diameter cast posts on tooth root fracture resistance in vitro. Stomatologija. 2006; 8: 30 – 32.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHuysmans MC, van der Varst PG, Schafer R, Peters MC, Plasschaert AJ, Soltesz U. Fatigue behavior of direct post-and-core-restored premolars. J Dent Res. 1992; 71: 1145 – 1150.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTorbjorner A, Fransson B. Biomechanical aspects of prosthetic treatment of structurally compromised teeth. Int J Prosthodont. 2004; 17: 135 – 141.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAnusavice KJ, Kakar K, Ferree N. Which mechnical and physical testing methods are relevant for predicting the clinical performance of ceramic-based dental prostheses? Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007; 3 ( Suppl. ): 218 – 231.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMagne P, Douglas WH. Design optimization and evolution of bonded ceramics for the anterior dentition: a finite-element analysis. Quintessence Int. 1999; 30: 661 – 672.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRivera EM, Yamauchi M. Site comparisons of dentine collagen cross-links from extracted human teeth. Arch Oral Biol. 1993; 38: 541 – 546.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDe Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Peumans M, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Braem M, Van Meerbeek B. A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue: methods and results. J Dent Res. 2005; 84: 118 – 132.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFrank RM. Ultrastructure of human dentine 40 years ago – progress and perspectives. Arch Oral Biol. 1999; 44: 979 – 984.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTitley KC, Chernecky R, Rossouw PE, Kulkarni GV. The effect of various storage methods and media on shear-bond strengths of dental composite resin to bovine dentine. Arch Oral Biol. 1998; 43: 305 – 311.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRoulet JF, Van Meerbeek B. Editorial: Statistics: a nuisance, a tool, or a must? J Adhes Dent. 2007; 9: 287 – 288.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceScharnagl P, Behr M, Rosentritt M, Leibrock A, Lang R, Handel G. Simulation of physiological tooth mobility in in vitro stress examination of dental restorations in the masticator. J Dent Res. 1997; 431: 114 ( IADR/CED abstracts ).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNaumann M, Preuss A, Frankenberger R. Reinforcement effect of adhesively luted fiber reinforced composite versus titanium posts. Dent Mater. 2007; 23: 138 – 144.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHahn R. Vollkeramische Einzelzahnrestaurationen. Habilitationsschrift TÜbingen. 1994.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNaumann MBF, Lange K-P. Vorschlag zur standardisierung von in-vitro-Belastbarkeitsuntersuchungen an endodontish behandelten ZÄhnen. Dtsch Zahnarztl Z. 2002; 57: 554 – 557.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKrejci I, Reich T, Lutz F, Albertoni M. An in vitro test procedure for evaluating dental restoration systems. 1. A computer-controlled mastication simulator. Schweiz Monatsschr. 1990; 100: 953 – 960.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceIsidor F, Odman P, Brondum K. Intermittent loading of teeth restored using prefabricated carbon fiber posts. Int J Prosthodont. 1996; 9: 131 – 136.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHuysmans MC, Peters MC, Van der Varst PG, Plasschaert AJ. Failure behaviour of fatigue-tested post and cores. Int Endod J. 1993; 26: 294 – 300.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRosentritt M, Behr M, Gebhard R, Handel G. Influence of stress simulation parameters on the fracture strength of all-ceramic fixed-partial dentures. Dent Mater. 2006; 22: 176 – 182.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKern M, Strub JR, LÜ X-Y. Wear of composite resin veneering materials in a dual-axis chewing simulator. J Oral Rehabil. 1999; 26: 372 – 378.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLibman WJ, Nicholls JI. Load fatigue of teeth restored with cast posts and cores and complete crowns. Int J Prosthodont. 1995; 8: 155 – 161.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStrand GV, Tviet AB, Gjerdet NR, Bergen GE. Marginal ridge strength of teeth with tunnel preparations. Int Dent J. 1995; 45: 117 – 123.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNaumann M, Sterzenbach G, Proschel P. Evaluation of load testing of postendodontic restorations in vitro: linear compressive loading, gradual cycling loading and chewing simulation. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2005; 74: 829 – 834.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBayne SC. Dental restorations for oral rehabilitation - testing of laboratory properties versus clinical performance for clinical decision making. J Oral Rehabil. 2007; 34: 921 – 932.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMjor IA. Minimum requirements for new dental materials. J Oral Rehabil. 2007; 34: 907 – 912.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHedlund SO, Johansson NG, SjÖgren G. Retention of prefabricated and individually cast root canal posts in vitro. Br Dent J. 2003; 195: 155 – 158.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGallo JR, Miller T, Xu X, Burges JO. In vitro evaluation of the retention of composite fiber and stainless steel posts. J Prosthodont. 2002; 11: 25 – 29.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDrummond JL. In vitro evaluation of endodontic posts. Am J Dent. 2000; 13: 5B – 8B.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceErtugrul HZ, Ismail YH. An in vitro comparison of cast metal dowel retention using various luting agents and tensile loading. J Prosthet Dent. 2005; 93: 446 – 452.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAlfredo E, Junior JR, Silva-Sousa Y, Sobrinho LO, Saquy PC, Sousa-Neto MD. Evaluation of retention of post-core system cemented with different materials on dentine surfaces treated with EDTA or Er:YAG laser irradiation. Photomed Laser Surg. 2005; 23: 36 – 40.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGernhardt CR, Bekes K, Schaller HG. Short-term retentive values of zirconium oxide posts cemented with glass ionomer and resin cement: an in vitro study and a case report. Quintessence Int. 2005; 36: 593 – 601.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTeixeira EC, Teixeira FB, Piasick JR, Thompson JY. An in vitro assessment of prefabricated fiber post systems. J Am Dent Assoc. 2006; 137: 1006 – 1012.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKalkan M, Usumez A, Ozturk AN, Belli S, Eskitascioglu G. Bond strength between root dentin and three glass-fiber post systems. J Prosthet Dent. 2006; 96: 41 – 46.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBraga NM, Alfredo E, Vansan LP, Fonseca TS, Ferraz JA, Sousa-Neto MD. Efficacy of ultrasound in removal of intraradicular posts using different techniques. J Oral Sci. 2005; 47: 117 – 121.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHuysmans MC, van der Varst PG. Mechanical longevity estimation model for post-and-core restorations. Dent Mater. 1995; 11: 252 – 257.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStewardson D. Non-metal post systems. Dent Update. 2001; 28: 326 – 336.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAnonymus. Wurzelstift- und Pin-Aufbausysteme – Nur korrosionsfeste Legierungungen und reines Titan optimal. Dental-Echo. 1988; 58: 22 – 24.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCleen Md. The relationship between root canal filling and post space preparation. Endodontie. 1992; 1: 207 – 216.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMorgano SM, Rodriques AHC, Sabrosa CE. Restoration of endodontically treated teeth. Dent Clin N Am. 2004; 48: 397 – 416.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDallari A, Rovatti L. Six years of in vitro/in vivo experience with Composipost. Compend Contin Educ Dent Suppl. 1996; 17: S57 – S63.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBateman G, Ricketts DNJ, Saunders WP. Fibre-based post systems: a review. Br Dent J. 2003; 195: 43 – 48.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePeroz I, Blankenstein F, Lange KP, Naumann M. Restoring endodontically treated teeth with posts and cores – a review. Quintessence Int. 2005; 36: 737 – 746.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFokkinga WA, Kreulen CM, Vallittu PK, Creugers NH. A structured analysis of in vitro failure loads and failure modes of fiber, metal, and ceramic post-and-core systems. Int J Prosthodont. 2004; 17: 476 – 482.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNothdurft FG, Gernet W, Pospiech PR. An in-vitro-investigation of zirconia post-and-core-systems. Deutsch ZahnÄrztl Z. 2003; 58: 451 – 456.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMitchell CA, Orr JF, Kennedy JG. A semi-empirical model for prediction of how post-retained crowns will fail under compressive loading. J Dent Res. 1992; 71: 1613 – 1618.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOttl P, Hahn L, Lauer H, Fay M. Fracture characteristics of carbon fibre, ceramic and non-palladium endodontic post systems at monotonously increasing loads. J Oral Rehabil. 2002; 29: 175 – 183.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGateau P, Sabek M, Dailey B. Fatigue testing and microscopic evaluation of post and core restorations under artificial crowns. J Prosthet Dent. 1999; 82: 341 – 347.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOblak C, Jevnikar P, Kosmac T, Funduk N, Marion L. Fracture resistance and reliability of zirconia posts. J Prosthet Dent. 2004; 91: 342 – 348.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePfeiffer P, Schulz A, Nergiz I, Schmage P. Yield strength of zirconia and glass fibre-reinforced posts. J Oral Rehabil. 2006; 33: 70 – 74.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceXible AA, de Jesus Tavarez RR, de Araujo Cdos R, Bonachela WC. Effect of silica coating and silanization on flexural and composite-resin bond strengths of zirconia posts: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent. 2006; 95: 224 – 229.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCarvalho CA, Valera MC, Oliveira LD, Camargo CH. Structural resistance in immature teeth using root reinforcements in vitro. Dent Traumatol. 2005; 21: 155 – 159.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYoldas O, Akova T, Uysal H. An experimental analysis of stresses in simulated flared root canals subjected to various post-core applications. J Oral Rehabil. 2005; 32: 427 – 432.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceIsidor F, Brondum K. Intermittent loading of teeth with tapered, individually cast or prefabricated, parallel-sided posts. Int J Prosthodont. 1992; 5: 257 – 261.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLauer HC, Ottl P, Weigl P. Mechanische Belastbarkeit verschiedener Stiftaufbau-Systeme. Dtsch ZahnÄrztl Z. 1995; 50: 985 – 989.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEdelhoff D, Spiekermann H, Yildirim M. Klinische Erfahrungen mit konfektionierten Wurzelstiften und individuellen Stumpfaufbauten aus Keramik. Deutsch ZahnÄrztl Z. 2000; 55: 746 – 750.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKhudonogov G. Repair of dentognatic defects with aluminum cast dowel constructions and technology for their manufacture. Biomed Eng NY. 1995; 29: 278 – 279.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNergiz IPU. Adhesion of various composite buildups to titanium root posts. Deutsch ZahnÄrztl Z. 1995; 50: 447 – 450.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchÖnbrodt MSP, Nergiz I, Platzer U. Haftfestigkeit zahnfarbener Wurzelstifte in AbhÄngigkeit von der OberflÄchenbehandlung und dem Befestigungskomposit. Dtsch ZahnÄrztl Z. 2003; 58: 55 – 59.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCoelho Santos G Jr, El-Mowafy O, Hernique Rubo J. Diametral tensile strength of a resin composite core with nonmetallic prefabricated posts: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent. 2004; 91: 335 – 341.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGoldberg F, Kaplan A, Roitman M, Manfre S, Picca M. Reinforcing effect of a resin glass ionomer in the restoration of immature roots in vitro. Dent Traumatol. 2002; 18: 70 – 72.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYokoyama K, Kimura Y, Matsumoto K, Fujishima A, Miyazaki T. Preventive effect of tooth fracture by pulsed Nd:YAG laser irradiation with diamine silver fluoride solution. J Clin Laser Med Surg. 2001; 19: 315 – 318.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceReeh ES, Douglas WH, Messer HH. Stiffness of endodontically-treated teeth related to restoration technique. J Dent Res. 1989; 68: 1540 – 1544.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBelli S, Erdemir A, Yildirim C. Reinforcement effect of polyethylene fibre in root-filled teeth: comparison of two restoration techniques. Int Endod J. 2006; 39: 136 – 142.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWood KC, Berzins DW, Luo Q, Thompson GA, Toth JM, Nagy WW. Resistance to fracture of two all-ceramic crown materials following endodontic access. J Prosthet Dent. 2006; 95: 33 – 41.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKishen A, George S, Kumar R. Enterococcus faecalis-mediated biomineralized biofilm formation on root canal dentine in vitro. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2006; 77: 406 – 415.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBalto H, Al-Nazhan S, Al-Mansour K, Al-Otaibi M, Siddiqu Y. Microbial leakage of Cavit, IRM, and Temp Bond in post-prepared root canals using two methods of gutta-percha removal: an in vitro study. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2005; 6: 53 – 61.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHannig C, Westphal C, Becker K, Attin T. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored with CAD/CAM ceramic inlays. J Prosthet Dent. 2005; 94: 342 – 349.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVon Fraunhofer JA, Klotz DA, Jones OJ. Microleakage within endodontically treated teeth using a simplified root canal preparation technique: an in vitro study. Gen Dent. 2005; 53: 439 – 43 ( quiz 44, 46 ).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYang H-S, Lang LA, Molina A, Felton DA. The effects of dowel design and load direction on dowel-and-core restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 2001; 85: 558 – 567.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKo C-C, Chu C-S, Chung K-H, Lee M-C. A finite element analysis – effects of posts on dentin stress distribution in pulpless teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1992; 68: 421 – 427.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceToparli M. A finite element analysis (FEM) – stress analysis in a post-restored tooth utilizing the FEM (Finite element method). J Oral Rehabil. 2003; 30: 470 – 476.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYang H-S, Lang LA, Guckes AD, Felton DA. FEM – the effect of thermal change on various dowel-and-core restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent. 2001; 86: 74 – 80.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStiefenhofer ASH, Hackhofer Th. Biomechanische Untersuchungen von Stiftaufbauten mit Hilfe der finiten-elemente-analyse. Dtsch ZahnÄrztl Z. 1994; 49: 711 – 715.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceUsumez A, Cobankara FK, Ozturk N, Eskitascioglu G, Belli S. Microleakage of endodontically treated teeth with different dowel systems. J Prosthet Dent. 2004; 92: 163 – 169.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBoyarsky H, Davis R. Root fracture with dentin-retained posts. Am J Dent. 1992; 5: 11 – 14.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNaumann M, Preuss A, Rosentritt M. Effect of incomplete crown ferrules on load capacity of endodontically treated maxillary incisors restored with fiber posts, composite build-ups, and all-ceramic crowns: an in vitro evaluation after chewing simulation. Acta Odontol Scand. 2006; 64: 31 – 36.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKarna JC. A fiber composite laminate endodontic post and core. Am J Dent. 1996; 9: 230 – 232.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHeydecke GBF, Strub JR. The effect of various post-/core buildup designs on the fracutre resistance of crown-restored incisors. Deutsch ZahnÄrztl Z. 1999; 54: 637 – 640.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
j.1365-2842.2009.01940.x.pdf
Size:
102.9KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.