Show simple item record

Girls and guys, ghetto and bougie: Metapragmatics, ideology and the management of social identities 1

dc.contributor.authorBrown, David Westen_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-01T22:05:36Z
dc.date.available2010-06-01T22:05:36Z
dc.date.issued2006-11en_US
dc.identifier.citationBrown, David West (2006). "Girls and guys, ghetto and bougie: Metapragmatics, ideology and the management of social identities 1 ." Journal of Sociolinguistics 10(5): 596-610. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/75117>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1360-6441en_US
dc.identifier.issn1467-9841en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/75117
dc.format.extent141113 bytes
dc.format.extent3109 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltden_US
dc.rightsThe author 2006 Journal compilation © Blackwell Publishing Ltd. 2006en_US
dc.subject.otherMetapragmatic Awarenessen_US
dc.subject.otherMetalanguageen_US
dc.subject.otherAfrican American Englishen_US
dc.subject.otherLanguage Styleen_US
dc.subject.otherYouth Cultureen_US
dc.titleGirls and guys, ghetto and bougie: Metapragmatics, ideology and the management of social identities 1en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelLinguisticsen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelSociologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHumanitiesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arboren_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/75117/1/j.1467-9841.2006.00297.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1467-9841.2006.00297.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Sociolinguisticsen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBaugh, John. 2000. Beyond Ebonics: Linguistic Pride and Racial Prejudice. New York: Oxford University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBucholtz, Mary. 1999. You da man: Narrating the racial other in the production of white masculinity. Journal of Sociolinguistics 3: 443 – 460.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCameron, Deborah. 1995. Verbal Hygiene, The Politics of Language. London: Routledge.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCoates, Jennifer ( ed.). 1998. Language and Gender: A Reader. Oxford, U.K.: Blackwell.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCoupland, Nikolas and Adam Jaworski. 2004. Sociolinguistic perspectives on metalanguage: Reflexivity, evaluation and ideology. In Adam Jaworski, Nikolas Coupland and Dariusz Galasiński ( eds.) Metalanguage: Social and Ideological Perspectives. New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 15 – 51.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCutler, Cecilia A. 1999. Yorkville Crossing: White teens, hip hop and African American English. Journal of Sociolinguistics 3: 428 – 442.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFordham, Signithia. 1999. Dissin' ‘The Standard’: Ebonics as guerilla warfare at Capital High. Anthropology & Education Quarterly 30: 272 – 293.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFordham, Signithia. 1988. Racelessness as a factor in black students' school success: Pragmatic strategy or pyrrhic victory? Harvard Educational Review 58: 54 – 84.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFordham, Signithia and John U. Ogbu. 1986. Black students' school success: Coping with the ‘burden of “acting white”’. Urban Review 18: 176 – 206.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGilroy, Paul. 1987. There Ain ' t No Black in the Union Jack: The Cultural Politics of Race and Nation. London: Hutchinson.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGreen, Lisa J. 2002. African American English: A Linguistic Introduction. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHall, Stuart. 1996. New ethnicities. In David Morley and Kuan-Hsing Chen ( eds.) Stuart Hall: Critical Dialogues in Cultural Studies. London: Routledge. 441 – 449.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceIrvine, Judith and Susan Gal. 2000. Language ideology and linguistic differentiation. In Paul V. Kroskrity ( ed.) Regimes of Language: Ideologies, Polities, and Identities. Santa Fe, New Mexico: School of American Research Press. 35 – 83.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLabov, William. 1966. Hypercorrection by the lower middle class as a factor in linguistic change. In William Bright ( ed.) Sociolinguistics. The Hague, The Netherlands: Mouton. 84 – 113.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLippi-Green, Rosina. 1997. English with an Accent: Language, Ideology, and Discrimination in the United States. New York: Routledge.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcIntosh, Janet. 2005. Baptismal essentialisms: Giriama code choice and the reification of ethnoreligious boundaries. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 15: 151 – 170.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMilroy, James and Lesley Milroy. 1985. Authority in Language: Investigating Language Prescription and Standardisation, Language, Education, and Society. London: Routledge & Keagan Paul.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMugglestone, Lynda. 2003. Talking Proper: The Rise of Accent as Social Symbol. New York: Oxford University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNeal-Barnett, Angela M. 2001. Being black: New thoughts on the old phenomenon of acting white. In Angela M. Neal-Barnett, Josefina M. Contreras and Kathryn A. Kerns ( eds.) Forging Links: African American Children: Clinical Development Perspectives. Westport, Connecticut: Praeger. 75 – 88.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePreston, Dennis R. 2004. Folk metalanguage. In Adam Jaworski, Nikolas Coupland and Dariusz Galasiński ( eds.) Metalanguage: Social and Ideological Perspectives. New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 75 – 101.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRader, Walter. 2004. The Online Slang Dictionary: A Collaborative Project 2003. http://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~wrader/slang/ Accessed on 26 November 2004.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRampton, Ben. 1995. Crossing: Language and Ethnicity among Adolescents. London: Longman.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRickford, John R. and Faye McNair-Knox. 1994. Addressee- and topic-influenced style shift: A quantitative sociolinguistic study. In Douglas Biber and Edward Finegan ( eds.) Sociolinguistic Perspectives on Register. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press. 235 – 276.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRickford, John R. and Russell John Rickford. 2000. Spoken Soul: The Story of Black English. New York: Wiley.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRumsey, Alan. 1990. Wording, meaning, and linguistic ideology. American Anthropologist 92: 346 – 361.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSilverstein, Michael. 1979. Language structure and linguistic ideology. In Paul R. Clyne, William F. Hanks and Carol L. Hofbauer ( eds.) The Elements: A Parasession on Linguistic Units and Levels. Chicago, Illinois: Chicago Linguistic Society. 193 – 247.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSilverstein, Michael. 1993. Metapragmatic discourse and metapragmatic function. In John A. Lucy ( ed.) Reflexive Language: Reported Speech and Metapragmatics. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press. 33 – 58.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSilverstein, Michael. 1998. The uses and utility of ideology. In Bambi B. Schieffelin, Kathryn A. Woolard and Paul V. Kroskrity ( eds.) Language Ideologies: Practice and Theory. New York: Oxford University Press. 123 – 145.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSilverstein, Michael. 2001. The limits of awareness. In Alessandro Duranti ( ed.) Linguistic Anthropology: A Reader. Malden, Massachusetts: Blackwell. 382 – 401.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSmitherman, Geneva. 1998. Ebonics, King, and Oakland: Some folk don't believe fat meat is greasy. Journal of English Linguistics 26: 97 – 107.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSweetland, Julie. 2002. Unexpected but authentic use of an ethnically-marked dialect. Journal of Sociolinguistics 6: 514 – 536.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTrudgill, Peter. 1983. On Dialect: Social and Geographical Perspectives. Oxford, U.K.: Blackwell.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVerschueren, Jef. 2004. Notes on the role of metapragmatic awareness in language use. In Adam Jaworski, Nikolas Coupland and Dariusz Galasiński ( eds.) Metalanguage: Social and Ideological Perspectives. New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 53 – 73.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.