Show simple item record

Exoanal ultrasound of the anal sphincter: normal anatomy and sphincter defects

dc.contributor.authorPeschers, Ursula M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorDeLancey, John O. L.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSchaer, Gabriel N.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSchuessler, Bernharden_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-01T22:06:06Z
dc.date.available2010-06-01T22:06:06Z
dc.date.issued1997-09en_US
dc.identifier.citationPeschers, Ursula M.; DeLancey, John O. L.; Schaer, Gabriel N.; Schuessler, Bernhard (1997). "Exoanal ultrasound of the anal sphincter: normal anatomy and sphincter defects." BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology 104(9): 999-1003. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/75125>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1470-0328en_US
dc.identifier.issn1471-0528en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/75125
dc.description.abstractTo describe the sonographic appearance of normal anal sphincter anatomy and sphincter defects evaluated with a conventional 5 MHz convex transducer placed on the perineum. Design Prospective, single-blind study. Setting Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan Medical Center, USA. Population Twenty-five women with symptoms of faecal incontinence, 11 asymptomatic nulliparous women, and 32 asymptomatic parous women. Methods A convex scanner was placed on the perineum with the woman in lithotomy position. Images were taken at three levels of the sphincter canal. Pictures were evaluated by two examiners who were blinded to the case history of the women and to the results of each other for the presence or absence of sphincter defects. Main outcome measures Description of anal sphincter appearance on endoanal ultrasound. Reproducibilty of the evaluation of sphincter defects. Results The internal anal sphincter is visible as a hypoechoic circle; the external anal sphincter shows a hyperechoic pattern. Proximally the sling of the puborectalis muscle is visible. Sphincter defects were detected in 20 women. In all five women who subsequently underwent surgery, the presence and location of the defect was confirmed at the time of surgery. Examiners were in agreement 100% of the time on the presence or absence of internal defects. They disagreed in one patient on the presence of an external defect. Conclusion Exoanal ultrasound provides information on normal anatomy and on defects of the anal sphincter.en_US
dc.format.extent568953 bytes
dc.format.extent3109 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltden_US
dc.rightsRCOG 1997 BJOG: an International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecologyen_US
dc.titleExoanal ultrasound of the anal sphincter: normal anatomy and sphincter defectsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelObstetrics and Gynecologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecology, The University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Kantonsspital, Luzern, Switzerlanden_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/75125/1/j.1471-0528.1997.tb12056.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1471-0528.1997.tb12056.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecologyen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCrawford LA, Quint EH, Pearl ML, DeLancey JOL. Incontinence following rapture of the anal sphincter during delivery. Obstet Gynecol 1993; 82: 527 – 531.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSultan AH, Kamm MA, Hudson, CN, Thomas JN, Bartram CI. Anal sphincter disruption during vaginal delivery. N Engl J Med 1993; 329: 1905 – 1911.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSultan AH, Loder PB, Bartram CI, Kamm MA, Hudson CN. Vaginal endosonography: new approach to image the undisturbed anal sphincter. Dis Colon Rectum 1994; 37: 1296 – 1299.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSandridge DA, Thorp JM. Vaginal endosonography in the assessment oftheanorectum. Obstet Gynecol 1995; 86: 1007 – 1009.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBennett RC, Duthie HL. The functional importance of the internal anal sphincter. BrJ Surg 1964; 51: 355 – 357.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSultan AH, Kamm MA, Talbot IC, Nicholls RJ, Bartram CI. Anal endosonography for identifying external sphincter defects confirmed histologically. BrJ Surg 1994; 81: 463 – 465.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMadoff RD, Williams JG, Caushaj PF. Fecal Incontinence. N Engl J Med 1992; 326: 1002 – 1007.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSnooks SJ, Swash M, Setchell M, Henry MM. Injury to innervation of the pelvic floor sphincter musculature in childbirth. Lancet 1984; 2: 546 – 550.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceToglia MR, DeLancey JOL. Anal incontinence and the obstetrician-gynecologist. Obstet Gynecol 1994; 84: 731 – 740.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceParks AG, Swash M, Urich H. Sphincter denervation in anorectal incontinence and rectal prolapse. Gut 1977; 18: 656 – 665.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSnooks SJ Henry MM Swash M. Faecal incontinence due to external anal sphincter division in childbirth is associated with damage to the innervation of the pelvic floor musculature: a double pathology. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1985; 92: 824 – 828.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBurnett SJD, Spence-Jones C, Speakman CTM, Kamm MA, Bartram CI. Unsuspected sphincter damage followed childbirth revealed by anal endosonography. Br J Radial 1991; 64: 225 – 227.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchaer ON, Koechli OR, Schuessler B, Haller U. Perineal ultrasound for evaluation the bladder neck in urinary stress incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 1995; 85: 220 – 224.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCreighton SM, Pearce JM, Stanton SL. Perineal video-ultrasonography in the assessment of vaginal prolapse: Early observations. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1992; 99: 310 – 313.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLaw PJ, Bartram CI. Anal endosonography: technique and normal anatomy. Gastrointest Radial 1989; 14: 349 – 353.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShaefer A, Enck P, Fuerst G, Kahn Th, Frieling T, Luebke HJ. Anatomy of the anal sphincters: comparison of anal endosonography to magnetic resonance imaging. Dis Colon Rectum 1994; 37: 777 – 781.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTjandra JJ, Milsom JW, Stolfi VM, Lavery I, Oakley J, Fazio V. Endoluminal ultrasound defines anatomy of the anal canal and pelvic floor. Dis Colon Rectum 1992; 35: 465 – 470.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSultan AH, Nicholls RJ, Kamm MA, Hudson CN, Beynon J, Bartram CI. Anal endosonography and correlation with in vitro and in vivo anatomy. Br J Surg 1993; 80: 508 – 511.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSultan AH, Kamm MA, Nicholls RJ, Bartram CI. Prospective study of the extent of internal anal sphincter division during lateral sphinc-terotomy. Dis Colon Rectum 1994; 37: 1031 – 1033.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDeen KI, Kumar D, Williams JG, Olliff J, Keighley MBR. Anal sphincter defects. Correlation between endoanal ultrasound and surgery. Ann Surg 1993; 218: 201 – 205.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.