Show simple item record

Evolution of host avoidance in a leafmining fly, Amauromyza flavifrons

dc.contributor.authorUesugi, Akaneen_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-01T22:07:38Z
dc.date.available2010-06-01T22:07:38Z
dc.date.issued2008-09en_US
dc.identifier.citationUesugi, Akane (2008). "Evolution of host avoidance in a leafmining fly, Amauromyza flavifrons ." Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 128(3): 398-402. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/75149>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0013-8703en_US
dc.identifier.issn1570-7458en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/75149
dc.description.abstractHerbivorous insects are characterized by a great diversity of host plant associations, yet, the processes driving host range evolution are not fully understood. When herbivores encounter a novel host, local selection pressures are expected to shape traits that mediate plant–insect interactions. I show that a leafmining fly, Amauromyza flavifrons (Meigen) (Diptera: Agromyzidae), suffers a profound fitness cost by ovipositing on a novel host, Beta vulgaris L. (sugar beet) (Chenopodiaceae). Leafminers from a sugar beet-free population readily oviposit on B. vulgaris leaves, whereas those collected from a population near sugar beet farms discriminate against B. vulgaris . This finding suggests that oviposition specificity in A. flavifrons populations may have evolved in response to the presence of the novel host, and represents the first evidence of host-avoidance evolution in the wild. Because this study compared only one pair of populations and thus lacks replication, future studies will test whether parallel evolution has occurred at B. vulgaris farm locales across North America.en_US
dc.format.extent123686 bytes
dc.format.extent3109 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltden_US
dc.rightsJournal compilation © 2008 The Netherlands Entomological Societyen_US
dc.subject.otherDiet Breadthen_US
dc.subject.otherHost Specializationen_US
dc.subject.otherNovel Hosten_US
dc.subject.otherNo-choice Testen_US
dc.subject.otherLocal Adaptationen_US
dc.subject.otherDipteraen_US
dc.subject.otherAgromyzidaeen_US
dc.titleEvolution of host avoidance in a leafmining fly, Amauromyza flavifronsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelNatural Resources and Environmenten_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/75149/1/j.1570-7458.2008.00724.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1570-7458.2008.00724.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceEntomologia Experimentalis et Applicataen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAgrawal A ( 2000 ) Host-range evolution: adaptation and trade-offs in fitness of mites on alternative hosts. Ecology 81: 500 – 508.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBecerra JX & Venable DL ( 1999 ) Macroevolution of insect-plant associations: the relevance of host biogeography to host affiliation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 96: 12626 – 12631.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBernays EA & Funk DJ ( 1999 ) Specialists make faster decisions than generalists: experiments with aphids. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B – Biological Sciences 266: 151 – 156.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBowers MD, Stamp NE & Collinge SK ( 1992 ) Early stage of host range expansion by a specialist herbivore, Euphydryas phaeton (Nymphalidae). Ecology 73: 526 – 536.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBush GL ( 1994 ) Sympatric speciation in animals: new wine in old bottles. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 9: 285 – 288.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCarroll SP & Boyed C ( 1992 ) Host race radiation in the soapberry bug: natural history, with the history. Evolution 46: 1052 – 1069.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCastillo-Chavez CSA, Levin S & Gould F ( 1988 ) Physiological and behavioral adaptation of insects to varying environments: a mathematical model. Evolution 42: 986 – 994.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCourtney SP, Chen GK & Gardner A ( 1989 ) A general model for individual host selection. Oikos 55: 55 – 65.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDennill GB, Donnelly D & Chown SL ( 1993 ) Expansion of host-plant range of a biocontrol agent Trichilogaster acaciaelongifoliae (Pteromalidae) released against the weed Acacia longifolia in South Africa. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 43: 1 – 10.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEgan SP & Funk DJ ( 2006 ) Individual advantages to ecological specialization: insights on cognitive constraints from three conspecific taxa. Proceedings of the Royal Society, Series B – Biological Sciences 273: 843 – 848.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFeder JL & Forbes AA ( 2007 ) Habitat avoidance and speciation for phytophagous insect specialists. Functional Ecology 21: 585 – 597.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceForbes AA, Fisher J & Feder JL ( 2005 ) Habitat avoidance: overlooking an important aspect of host-specific mating and sympatric speciation? Evolution 59: 1552 – 1559.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFox CW, Nilsson JA & Mousseau TA ( 1997 ) The ecology of diet expansion in a seed-feeding beetle: pre-existing variation, rapid adaptation and maternal effects? Evolutionary Ecology 11: 183 – 194.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFunk DJ & Bernays EA ( 2001 ) Geographic variation in host specificity reveals host range evolution in Uroleucon ambrosiae aphids. Ecology 82: 726 – 739.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFutuyma DJ & Moreno G ( 1988 ) The evolution of ecological specialization. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 19: 207 – 233.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGassmann AJ, Levy A, Tran T & Futuyma DJ ( 2006 ) Adaptations of an insect to a novel host plant: a phylogenetic approach. Functional Ecology 20: 478 – 485.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGould F ( 1984 ) Role of behavior in the evolution of insect adaptation to insecticides and resistant host plants. Bulletin of Entomological Society of America 30: 34 – 41.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGould F ( 1998 ) Sustainability of transgenic insecticidal cultivars: Integrating pest genetics and ecology. Annual Review of Entomology 43: 701 – 726.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGould F & Anderson A ( 1991 ) Effects of Bacillus thuringiensis and Hd-73 Δ-endotoxin on growth, behavior, and fitness of susceptible and toxin-adapted strains of Heliothis virescens (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Environmental Entomology 20: 30 – 38.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHawthorne DJ ( 1999 ) Physiological not behavioral adaptations of leafminers to a resistant host plant: a natural selection experiment. Environmental Entomology 28: 696 – 702.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJaenike J ( 1990 ) Host specialization in phytophagous insects. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 21: 243 – 273.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJallow MFA & Hoy CW ( 2006 ) Quantitative genetics of adult behavioral response and larval physiological tolerance to permethrin in diamondback moth (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 99: 1388 – 1395.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMulatu BS, Applebaum W & Coll M ( 2004 ) A recently acquired host plant provides an oligophagous insect herbivore with enemy-free space. Oikos 107: 231 – 238.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMurphy SM ( 2004 ) Enemy-free space maintains swallowtail butterfly host shift. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 101: 18048 – 18052.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMurphy SM & Feeny P ( 2006 ) Chemical facilitation of a naturally occurring host shift by Papilio machaon butterflies (Papilionidae). Ecological Monographs 76: 399 – 414.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNosil P, Crespi BJ & Sandoval CP ( 2002 ) Host-plant adaptation drives the parallel evolution of reproductive isolation. Nature 417: 440 – 443.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePapaj DR ( 2000 ) Ovarian dynamics and host use. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 45: 423 – 448.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRausher MD ( 1993 ) The evolution of habitat preference: avoidance and adaptation. Evolution of Insect Pests (ed. by KC Kim & BA McPheron ), pp. 259 – 283. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRenwick JAA ( 2002 ) The chemical world of crucivores: lures, treats and traps. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 104: 35 – 42.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceScheffer SJ ( 1995 ) Genetic and Ecological Influences of the Evolution of Host Range in a Leafmining Fly. PhD thesis. State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY, USA.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceScheffer SJ ( 1999 ) Use of sugar beet foliage by the introduced leafmining fly Amauromyza flavifrons (Diptera: Agromyzidae). Journal of Economical Entomology 92: 347 – 350.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchluter D & Nagel L ( 1995 ) Parallel speciation by natural selection. American Naturalist 146: 292 – 301.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSinger MC, Ng D, Vasco D & Thomas CD ( 1992 ) Rapidly evolving associations among oviposition preferences fail to constrain evolution of insect diet. American Naturalist 139: 9 – 20.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSpencer KA ( 1969 ) The Agromyzidae of Canada and Alaska. Entomological Society of Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSpencer KA ( 1972 ) Handbooks for the Identification of British Insects. Diptera: Agromyzidae. Royal Entomological Society, London, UK.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSpencer KA & Steyskal GC ( 1986 ) Manual of the Agromyzidae (Diptera) of the United States. United States Department of Agriculture, Washington DC, USA.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWasserman SS & Futuyma DJ ( 1981 ) Evolution of host plant utilization in laboratory populations of the Southern cowpea weevil, Callosobruchus maculatus Fabricius (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Evolution 35: 605 – 617.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZangerl AR, Huang T, McGovern JL & Berenbaum MR ( 2002 ) Paradoxical host shift by Depressaria pastinacella in North America: is enemy-free space involved? Oikos 98: 431 – 436.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.