Current status of kidney and pancreas transplantation in the United States, 1994–2003
dc.contributor.author | Danovitch, Gabriel M. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Cohen, David J. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Weir, Matthew R. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Stock, Peter G. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Bennett, William M. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Christensen, Laura L. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Sung, Randall S. | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-06-01T22:07:49Z | |
dc.date.available | 2010-06-01T22:07:49Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2005-04 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Danovitch, Gabriel M.; Cohen, David J.; Weir, Matthew R.; Stock, Peter G.; Bennett, William M.; Christensen, Laura L.; Sung, Randall S. (2005). "Current status of kidney and pancreas transplantation in the United States, 1994–2003." American Journal of Transplantation 5(4p2): 904-915. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/75152> | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1600-6135 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1600-6143 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/75152 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=15760417&dopt=citation | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 141971 bytes | |
dc.format.extent | 3109 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.format.mimetype | text/plain | |
dc.publisher | Munksgaard International Publishers | en_US |
dc.publisher | Blackwell Publishing Ltd | en_US |
dc.rights | Blackwell Munksgaard 2005 | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Deceased Donors | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Graft Survival | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Kidney Transplantation | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Kidney-pancreas Transplantation | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Living Donors | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Organ Donation | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Pancreas Transplantation | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Patient Survival | en_US |
dc.subject.other | SRTR | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Waiting List | en_US |
dc.title | Current status of kidney and pancreas transplantation in the United States, 1994–2003 | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Medicine (General) | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Health Sciences | en_US |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer Reviewed | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | Columbia University, New York, NY | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | University of California San Francisco Medical Center, San Francisco, CA | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | Northwest Renal Clinic, Portland, OR | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, University Renal Research and Education Association, Ann Arbor, MI | en_US |
dc.identifier.pmid | 15760417 | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/75152/1/j.1600-6135.2005.00835.x.pdf | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/j.1600-6135.2005.00835.x | en_US |
dc.identifier.source | American Journal of Transplantation | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Dickinson DM, Dykstra DM, Levine GM, Li S, Welch JC, Webb RL. Transplant data: sources, collection, and research considerations, 2004. Am J Transplant 2005; 5 ( Part 2 ): 850 – 861. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Schaubel DE, Dykstra DM, Murray S et al. Analytical approaches for transplant research, 2004. Am J Transplant 2005; 5 ( Part 2 ): 950 – 957. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Xue JL, Ma J, Lois T, Collins A. Forecast of the number of patients with end-stage-renal-disease in the United Sates in the year 2010. J Am Soc Nephrol 2001; 12: 2753 – 2761. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Gaston RS, Alvarenga DY, Becker B et al. Kidney and pancreas transplantation. Am J Transplant 2003; 3 ( Suppl. 4 ): 64 – 77. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | 5. U.S. Renal Data System, USRDS 2003 Annual Data Report: Atlas of end-stage renal disease in the United States. National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Bethesda, MD, 2003. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Magee JC, Bucuvalas JC, Farmer DG, Harmon WE, Hulbert-Shearon TE, Mendeloff EN. Pediatric transplantation. Am J Transplant 2004; 4 ( Suppl. 9 ): 54 – 71. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Meier-Kriesche H-U, Port FK, Ojo AO et al. Effect of waiting time on renal transplant outcome. Kidney Int 2000; 58: 1311 – 1317. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Metzger RA, Delmonico FL, Feng S, Port FK, Wynn JJ, Merion RM. Expanded criteria donors for kidney transplantation. Am J Transplant 2003; 3 ( Suppl. 4 ): 114 – 125. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Port FK, Bragg JL, Metzger RA et al. Donor characteristics associated with reduced graft survival: an approach to expanding the pool of kidney donors. Transplantation 2002; 74: 1281 – 1286. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Danovitch GM, Cecka JM. Allocation of deceased donor kidneys: past present, and future. Am J Kidney Dis 2003; 42: 882 – 890. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Guidinger MK, Sung RS, Lake CD et al. Initial experience with the expanded criteria donor kidney allocation system: impact on utilization (abstract). Am J Transplant 2004; 4 ( Suppl. 8 ): 160. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Sung RS, Guidinger MK, Leichtman AB et al. Initial experience with the expanded criteria donor kidney allocation system: impact on listed candidates (abstract). Am J Transplant 2004; 4 ( Suppl. 8 ): 303. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Distant DA, Ashby VB, Port FK, Leichtman AB, Wolfe RA, Merion RM. ECD mortality: OPO waiting time by race and age (abstract). Am J Transplant 2004; 4 ( Suppl. 8 ): 303. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Venstrom JM, McBride MA, Rother KI, Hirshberg B, Orchard TJ, Harlan DM. Survival after pancreas transplantation in patients with diabetes and preserved kidney function. JAMA 2003; 290: 2817 – 2823. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Reddy KS, Stablein D, Taranto S et al. Long-term survival following simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation versus kidney transplantation alone in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus and renal failure. Am J Kidney Dis 2003; 41: 464 – 470. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Gruessner RW, Sutherland DE, Gruessner AC. Increased patient survival after solitary pancreas transplants (abstract). Am J Transplant 2004; 4 ( Suppl. 8 ): 582 – 583. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Wynn JJ, Distant DA, Pirsch J et al. Kidney and pancreas transplantation. Am J Transplant 2004; 4 ( Suppl. 9 ); 72 – 80. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Roberts JP, Wolfe RA, Bragg-Gresham JL, et al. Effect of changing the priority for HLA matching on the rates and outcomes of kidney transplantation in minority groups. N Engl J Med 2004; 35: 545 – 551. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Port FK, Ashby VB, Leichtman AB et al. Eliminating points for HLA-B similarity increased kidney allocation to minority, pediatric, sensitized, and zero MM candidates (abstract). Am J Transplant 2004; 4 ( Suppl. 8 ): 414 – 415. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Cecka M, Gjertson D, Danovitch GM, Edward E. Most zero HLA-mismatched kidney transplant occur soon after listing leaving a waiting list of patients with increasingly uncommon HLA phenotypes (abstract). Am J Transplant 2004; 4 ( Suppl. 8 ): 322. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Danovitch GM, Smits J, Cohen B. Waiting-time or wasted time? The case for using time on dialysis to determine waiting time in the allocation of cadaveric kidneys. Am J Transplant 2002; 2: 891 – 893. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Danovitch GM, Rush SH, Gillespie B et al. Use of dialysis time to determine waiting time in the deceased-donor kidney allocation algorithm may improve access to transplantation for disadvantaged patient groups (abstract). J Am Soc Nephrol 2003; 14: 431a. | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Interdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.