Show simple item record

The Chemtrak Hp Chek Fingerstick Whole Blood Serology Test for the Detection of Helicobacter pylori Infection

dc.contributor.authorChey, William D.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMurthy, U. K.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLinscheer, W.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBarish, C.en_US
dc.contributor.authorRiff, D.en_US
dc.contributor.authorRubin, H.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSafdi, M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSchwartz, H.en_US
dc.contributor.authorShah, U.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWruble, L.en_US
dc.contributor.authorEl-Zimaity, H. M. T.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-01T22:14:06Z
dc.date.available2010-06-01T22:14:06Z
dc.date.issued1998-01en_US
dc.identifier.citationChey, W. D . ; Murthy, U. K . ; Linscheer, W . ; Barish, C . ; Riff, D . ; Rubin, H . ; Safdi, M . ; Schwartz, H . ; Shah, U . ; Wruble, L . ; El-Zimaity, H. M. T . (1998). "The Chemtrak Hp Chek Fingerstick Whole Blood Serology Test for the Detection of Helicobacter pylori Infection." The American Journal of Gastroenterology 93(1): 16-19. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/75251>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0002-9270en_US
dc.identifier.issn1572-0241en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/75251
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=9448166&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractTo evaluate a new whole blood serology test (Hp Chek; ChemTrak) that detects IgG antibodies to Helicobacter pylori . Methods : The study was conducted at 10 sites within the United States. Patients undergoing upper endoscopy for dyspepsia were recruited for enrollment. Those treated for H. pylori infection within a year of endoscopy and those who had regularly used proton pump inhibitors, bismuth compounds, or antibiotics within a month of endoscopy were not eligible. During endoscopy, specimens were obtained from the corpus and antrum for histological examination, which was performed by a single experienced pathologist. The Hp Chek was tested using whole blood and serum. Serum was also tested with a reference enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) at a centralized location. Test characteristics for the Hp Chek and ELISA were calculated using histology as the “gold standard.”. Results : Two hundred eighty-seven patients (140 women and 147 men; mean age 53 ± 6 yr ) were enrolled. The Hp Chek was easy to perform and yielded results 9 min after inoculation of the test cassette with whole blood or serum. When the Hp Chek used with whole blood was compared with histology as the gold standard, the sensitivity was 88%, specificity 85%, positive predictive value 83%, negative predictive value 90%, and percent agreement 86%. There were no statistically significant differences among the results obtained with the Hp Chek using whole blood, the Hp Chek using serum, or reference ELISA. Conclusions : The Hp Chek whole blood serology test was easy to perform and rapid and yielded performance characteristics comparable to those of a reference ELISA or the Hp Chek used with serum.en_US
dc.format.extent438426 bytes
dc.format.extent3109 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherBlackwell Science Incen_US
dc.rights1998 by Am. Coll. of Gastroenterologyen_US
dc.titleThe Chemtrak Hp Chek Fingerstick Whole Blood Serology Test for the Detection of Helicobacter pylori Infectionen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelInternal Medicine and Specialtiesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; VA Medical Center, Syracuse, New York; Raleigh, North Carolina; Anaheim, California; Beverly Hills, California; Cincinnati, Ohio; Miami, Florida; Leonardstown, Maryland; Memphis, Tennessee; and VA Medical Center, Houston, Texasen_US
dc.identifier.pmid9448166en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/75251/1/j.1572-0241.1998.016_c.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1572-0241.1998.016_c.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceThe American Journal of Gastroenterologyen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChey WD. The diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori. Hosp Physician 1997; 33: 11 – 22.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTalley NJ. A critique of therapeutic trials in Helicobacter pylori positive functional dyspepsia. Gastroenterology 1994; 106: 1174 – 83.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFendrick AM, Chernew ME. Hirth RA. et al. Alternative management strategies for patients with suspected peptic ulcer disease. Ann Intern Med 1995; 123: 260 – 8.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOfman JJ, Etchason J, Fullerton S. et al. Management strategies for Helicobacter pylori -seropositive patients with dyspepsia: Clinical and economic consequences. Ann Intern Med 1997; 126: 280 – 91.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLuzza F, Maletta M, Imeneo M. et al. Salivary-specific immunoglobulin G in the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection in dyspeptic patients. Am J Gastroenterol 1995; 90: 1820 – 3.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEvans DJ, Evans DG, Graham DY, et al. A sensitive and specific serologic test for detection of Campylobacter pylori infection. Gastroenterology 1989; 96: 1004 – 8.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGraham DY, Evans DJ, Peacock J, et al. Comparison of rapid serological tests (FlexSure HP and Quick Vue) with conventional ELISA for detection of Helicobacter pylori infection. Am J Gastroenterol 1996; 91: 942 – 8.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChey WD, Murthy UK, Linscheer WG, et al. A comparison between 4 different commercially available serology tests for Helicobacter pylori. Gastroenterology 1996: 110: A80 ( abstract ).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBorody TJ. Andrews P. Shortis NP. Evaluation of whole blood antibody kit to detect active Helicobacter pylori infection. Am J Gastroenterol 1996; 91: 2509 – 12.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLahaie RG. Ricard N. Validation of Helisal whole blood, serum, and saliva tests for the non-invasive diagnosis of H. pylori infection. Gastroenterology 1996; 110: A167 ( abstract ).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSadowski D. Cohen H. Laine L, et al. Evaluation of the FlexSure HP fingerstick blood test for the detection of H. pylori infection. Gastroenterology 1996; 110: A246 ( abstract ).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCohen H, Retama B, Johnson C. Evaluation of a rapid test to detect IgG antibodies to Helicobacter pylori using fingerstick whole blood samples. Gastroenterology 1996; 110: A83 ( abstract ).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGenta RM, Robason GO, Graham DY. Simultaneous visualization of Helicobacter pylori and gastric morphology: A new stain. Hum Pathol 1994; 25: 221 – 6.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceElta GH, Scheiman JM, Barnett JL, et al. Long-term follow-up of Helicobacter pylori treatment in non-ulcer dyspepsia patients. Am J Gastroenterol 1995; 90: 1089 – 93.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGreenberg RE, Bank S. The prevalence of Helicobacter pylori in non-ulcer dyspepsia. Arch Intern Med 1990; 150: 2053 – 5.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMegraud F. H. pylori species heterogeneity. In: Hunt RH. Tytgat GNJ, eds. Helicobacter pylori: Basic mechanisms to clinical cure. Hingham, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1994: 28 – 40.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLoy CT, Irwig SM, Katelaris PH, et al. Do commercial serological kits for Helicobacter pylori infection differ in accuracy? A meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol 1996; 91: 1138 – 44.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCutler AF, Havstad S, Ma CK, et al. Accuracy of invasive and noninvasive tests to diagnose Helicobacter pylori infection. Gastroenterology 1995; 109: 136 – 41.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThijs JC, van Zwet AA, Thijs WJ, et al. Diagnostic tests for Helicobacter pylori: A prospective evaluation of their accuracy, without selecting a single test as the gold standard. Am J Gastroenterol 1996: 91: 2125 – 9.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.