Safety and Imaging Quality of MRI in Pediatric and Adult Congenital Heart Disease Patients with Pacemakers

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Pulver, Aaron F. en_US
dc.contributor.author Puchalski, Michael D. en_US
dc.contributor.author Bradley, David J. en_US
dc.contributor.author Minich, L. LuAnn en_US
dc.contributor.author Su, Jason T. en_US
dc.contributor.author Saarel, Elizabeth V. en_US
dc.contributor.author Whitaker, Patricia en_US
dc.contributor.author Etheridge, Susan P. en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2010-06-01T22:24:30Z
dc.date.available 2010-06-01T22:24:30Z
dc.date.issued 2009-04 en_US
dc.identifier.citation PULVER, AARON F.; PUCHALSKI, MICHAEL D.; BRADLEY, DAVID J.; MINICH, L. LUANN; SU, JASON T.; SAAREL, ELIZABETH V.; WHITAKER, PATRICIA; ETHERIDGE, SUSAN P. (2009). "Safety and Imaging Quality of MRI in Pediatric and Adult Congenital Heart Disease Patients with Pacemakers." Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology 32(4): 450-456. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/75401> en_US
dc.identifier.issn 0147-8389 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1540-8159 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/75401
dc.identifier.uri http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=19335853&dopt=citation en_US
dc.format.extent 156020 bytes
dc.format.extent 3109 bytes
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.format.mimetype text/plain
dc.publisher Blackwell Publishing Inc en_US
dc.rights © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. en_US
dc.subject.other Magnetic Resonance Imaging en_US
dc.subject.other Pacemaker en_US
dc.subject.other Safety en_US
dc.subject.other Congenital Heart Disease en_US
dc.subject.other Epicardial Leads en_US
dc.title Safety and Imaging Quality of MRI in Pediatric and Adult Congenital Heart Disease Patients with Pacemakers en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel Physiology en_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel Health Sciences en_US
dc.description.peerreviewed Peer Reviewed en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationum † University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationother * University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah en_US
dc.identifier.pmid 19335853 en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurl http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/75401/1/j.1540-8159.2009.02304.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2009.02304.x en_US
dc.identifier.source Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference Shellock FG, Tkach JA, Ruggieri PM, Masaryk TJ. Cardiac pacemakers, ICDs, and loop recorder: Evaluation of translational attraction using conventional (“long-bore”) and “short-bore” 1.5- and 3.0-Tesla MR systems. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2003; 5: 387 – 397. en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference Shellock FG, Crues JV. MR procedures: Biologic effects, safety, and patient care. Radiology 2004; 232: 635 – 652. en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference Levine GN, Gomes AS, Arai AE, Bluemke DA, Flamm SD, Kanal E, Manning WJ, et al. Safety of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiovascular devices: An American Heart Association scientific statement from the Committee on Diagnostic and Interventional Cardiac Catheterization, Council on Clinical Cardiology, and the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention: Endorsed by the American College of Cardiology Foundation, the North American Society for Cardiac Imaging, and the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. Circulation 2007; 116: 2878 – 2891. en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference Roguin A, Schwitter J, Vahlhaus C, Lombardi M, Brugada J, Vardas P, Auricchio A, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging in individuals with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices. Europace 2008; 10: 336 – 346. en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference Hayes DL, Holmes DR Jr, Gray JE. Effect of 1.5 Tesla nuclear magnetic resonance imaging scanner on implanted permanent pacemakers. J Am Coll Cardiol 1987; 10: 782 – 786. en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference Erlebacher JA, Cahill PT, Pannizzo F, Knowles RJ. Effect of magnetic resonance imaging on DDD pacemakers. Am J Cardiol 1986; 57: 437 – 440. en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference Kalin R, Stanton MS. Current clinical issues for MRI scanning of pacemaker and defibrillator patients. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2005; 28: 326 – 328. en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference Martin ET, Coman JA, Shellock FG, Pulling CC, Fair R, Jenkins K. Magnetic resonance imaging and cardiac pacemaker safety at 1.5-Tesla. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 43: 1315 – 1324. en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference Nazarian S, Roguin A, Zviman MM, Lardo AC, Dickfeld TL, Calkins H, Weiss RG, et al. Clinical utility and safety of a protocol for noncardiac and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging of patients with permanent pacemakers and implantable-cardioverter defibrillators at 1.5 tesla. Circulation 2006; 114: 1277 – 1284. en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference Sommer T, Naehle CP, Yang A, Zeijlemaker V, Hackenbroch M, Schmiedel A, Meyer C, et al. Strategy for safe performance of extrathoracic magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 tesla in the presence of cardiac pacemakers in non-pacemaker-dependent patients: A prospective study with 115 examinations. Circulation 2006; 114: 1285 – 1292. en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference 11.  U.S. Department of Health and Human Services FaDA, Center for Devices and Radiologic Health. Guidance for industry and FDA staff: Criteria for significant risk investigations of magnetic resonance diagnostic devices. In: Office of Device Evaluation ( ed ): Radiological Devices Branch DoR, Abdominal, and Radiological Devices. 2003. en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference Goldsher D, Amikam S, Boulos M, Suleiman M, Shreiber R, Eran A, Goldshmid Y, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging for patients with permanent pacemakers: Initial clinical experience. Isr Med Assoc J 2006; 8: 91 – 94. en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference Gimbel JR, Bailey SM, Tchou PJ, Ruggieri PM, Wilkoff BL. Strategies for the safe magnetic resonance imaging of pacemaker-dependent patients. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2005; 28: 1041 – 1046. en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference Roguin A, Zviman MM, Meininger GR, Rodrigues ER, Dickfeld TM, Bluemke DA, Lardo A, et al. Modern pacemaker and implantable cardioverter/defibrillator systems can be magnetic resonance imaging safe: In vitro and in vivo assessment of safety and function at 1.5 T. Circulation 2004; 110: 475 – 482. en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference Shellock FG, O'Neil M, Ivans V, Kelly D, O'Connor M, Toay L, Crues JV. Cardiac pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators are unaffected by operation of an extremity MR imaging system. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999; 172: 165 – 170. en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference Luechinger R, Zeijlemaker VA, Pedersen EM, Mortensen P, Falk E, Duru F, Candinas R, et al. In vivo heating of pacemaker leads during magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Heart J 2005; 26: 376 – 383; discussion 25-7. en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference Forghani N, Cohen RA, Abbott MB. Radiation risks of CT scans. Pediatr Rev 2006; 27: 79. en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference McCollough CH, Zhang J, Primak AN, Clement WJ, Buysman JR. Effects of CT irradiation on implantable cardiac rhythm management devices. Radiology 2007; 243: 766 – 774. en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference Yamaji S, Imai S, Saito F, Yagi H, Kushiro T, Uchiyama T. Does high-power computed tomography scanning equipment affect the operation of pacemakers? Circ J 2006; 70: 190 – 197. en_US
dc.owningcollname Interdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed
 Show simple item record

This item appears in the following Collection(s)


Search Deep Blue

Advanced Search

Browse by

My Account

Information

Available Now


MLibrary logo