Show simple item record

Bedside Interactions from the Other Side of the Bedrail

dc.contributor.authorFletcher, Kathlyn E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorRankey, David S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorStern, David T.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-01T22:28:01Z
dc.date.available2010-06-01T22:28:01Z
dc.date.issued2005-01en_US
dc.identifier.citationFletcher, Kathlyn E.; Rankey, David S.; Stern, David T. (2005). "Bedside Interactions from the Other Side of the Bedrail." Journal of General Internal Medicine 20(1): 58-61. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/75456>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0884-8734en_US
dc.identifier.issn1525-1497en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/75456
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=15693929&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractTo assess the importance to patients of various aspects of bedside interactions with physician teams. Design : Cross-sectional survey. Setting : VA hospital. Patients : Ninety-seven medical inpatients. Intervention : Survey of 44 questions including short answer, multiple choice, and Likert-type questions. Measurements and Main Results : Data analysis included descriptive statistics. The sample was predominantly male, with a mean age of 62. Overall satisfaction with the hospital experience and with the team of doctors were both high (95% and 96% reported being very or mostly satisfied, respectively). Patients reported learning about several issues during their interactions with the teams; the 3 most highly rated areas were new problems, tests that will be done, and treatments that will be done. Most patients (76%) felt that their teams cared about them very much. Patients were made comfortable when the team showed that they cared, listened, and appeared relaxed (reported by 63%, 57%, and 54%, respectively). Patients were made uncomfortable by the team using language they did not understand (22%) and when several people examined them at once (13%). Many (58%) patients felt personally involved in teaching. The majority of patients liked having medical students and residents involved in their care (69% and 64%, respectively). Conclusions : Patients have much to teach about what is important about interacting with physician teams. Although patients' reactions to team interactions are generally positive, patients are different with respect to what makes them comfortable and uncomfortable. Taking their preferences into account could improve the experience of being in a teaching hospital.en_US
dc.format.extent81176 bytes
dc.format.extent3109 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherBlackwell Science Incen_US
dc.rights© 2005 by the Society of General Internal Medicine. All rights reserveden_US
dc.subject.otherPatient-physician Relationshipen_US
dc.subject.otherBedside Interactionsen_US
dc.subject.otherSurvey Methodsen_US
dc.titleBedside Interactions from the Other Side of the Bedrailen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelInternal Medicine and Specialtiesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartments of Medicine and Medical Education, University of Michigan Medical School and VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherClement J. Zablocki VAMC, Milwaukee, WI, USA ;en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDivision of General Internal Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA ;en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherUniversity of Cincinnati School of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA ;en_US
dc.identifier.pmid15693929en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/75456/1/j.1525-1497.2005.40192.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.40192.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of General Internal Medicineen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNair BR, Coughlan JL, Hensley MJ. Student and patient perspectives on bedside teaching. Med Educ. 1997; 31: 341 – 6.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference2.  Committee on Quality Health Care in America, Institute of Medicine. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2000.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLinfors EW, Neelon FA. Sounding boards. The case of bedside rounds. N Engl J Med. 1980; 303: 1230 – 3.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLehmann LS, Brancati FL, Chen M, Roter D, Dobs AS. The effect of bedside case presentations on patients' perceptions of their medical care. N Engl J Med. 1997; 336: 1150 – 5.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSimons RJ, Baily RG, Zelis R, Zwillich CW. The physiologic and psychological effects of the bedside presentation. N Engl J Med. 1989; 321: 1273 – 5.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFletcher KE, Furney SL, Stern DT. Patients speak: what's really important about bedside interactions with physician teams. J Gen Intern Med. 2003; 18 ( suppl 1 ): 232. Abstract.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGlaser BG, Strauss AL. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago, IL: Aldine Publishing Company; 1967: 101 – 15.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMatthews DA, Feinstein AR. A new instrument for patients' ratings of physician performance in the hospital setting. J Gen Intern Med. 1989; 4: 14 – 22.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRodgers HD, Carline JD, Paauw DS. Examination room presentations in general internal medicine clinic: patients' and students' perceptions. Acad Med. 2003; 78: 945 – 9.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWang-Cheng RM, Barnas GP, Sigmann P, Riendl PA, Young MJ. Bedside case presentations: why patients like them but learners don't. J Gen Intern Med. 1989; 4: 284 – 7.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAnderson LA, Dedrick RF. Development of the Trust in Physician scale: a measure to assess interpersonal trust in patient-physician relationships. Psychol Rep. 1990; 67: 1091 – 100.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLaCombe MA. On bedside teaching. Ann Intern Med. 1997; 126: 217 – 20.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRamani S, Orlander JD, Strunin L, Barber TW. Whither clinical teaching? A focus-group study of clinical teachers. Acad Med. 2003; 78: 384 – 90.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.