View Item 

Show simple item record

The Acquisition of Tense–Aspect: Converging Evidence From Corpora and Telicity Ratings
dc.contributor.authorWulff, Stefanieen_US
dc.contributor.authorEllis, Nick C.en_US
dc.contributor.authorRömer, Uteen_US
dc.contributor.authorBardovi–harlig, Kathleenen_US
dc.contributor.authorLeblanc, Chelsea J.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-01T22:33:11Z
dc.date.available2010-06-01T22:33:11Z
dc.date.issued2009-09en_US
dc.identifier.citationWULFF, STEFANIE; ELLIS, NICK C.; RÖMER, UTE; BARDOVI–HARLIG, KATHLEEN; LEBLANC, CHELSEA J. (2009). "The Acquisition of Tense–Aspect: Converging Evidence From Corpora and Telicity Ratings." The Modern Language Journal 93(3): 354-369. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/75534>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0026-7902en_US
dc.identifier.issn1540-4781en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/75534
dc.format.extent5151049 bytes
dc.format.extent3109 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Incen_US
dc.rights© 2009 by The Modern Language Journalen_US
dc.titleThe Acquisition of Tense–Aspect: Converging Evidence From Corpora and Telicity Ratingsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelLinguisticsen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHumanitiesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan Department of Computer Science 1200 Fairground Plymouth, MI 48170 Email: leblancc@umich.eduen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/75534/1/j.1540-4781.2009.00895.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00895.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceThe Modern Language Journalen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAndersen, R. W. ( 1990 ). Models, processes, principles and strategies: Second language acquisition inside and outside the classroom. In B. VanPatten & J. F. Lee ( Eds. ), Second language acquisition—foreign language learning ( pp. 45 – 78 ). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAndersen, R. W. ( 1993 ). Four operating principles and input distribution as explanation for underdeveloped and mature morphological systems. In K. Hyltenstam & A. Viberg ( Eds. ), Progression and regression in language ( pp. 309 – 339 ). Oxford: Oxford University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAndersen, R. W., & Shirai, Y. ( 1994 ). Discourse motivations for some cognitive acquisition principles. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 133 – 156.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAndersen, R. W., & Shirai, Y. ( 1996 ). The primacy of aspect in first and second language acquisition: The pidgin–creole connection. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia ( Eds. ), Handbook of second language acquisition ( pp. 527 – 570 ). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBardovi-Harlig, K. ( 1998 ). Narrative structure and lexical aspect: Conspiring factors in second language acquisition of tense–aspect morphology. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 471 – 508.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBardovi-Harlig, K. ( 2000 ). Tense and aspect in second language acquisition: Form, meaning, and use. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBardovi-Harlig, K., & Reynolds, D. W. ( 1995 ). The role of lexical aspect in the acquisition of tense and aspect. TESOL Quarterly, 29, 107 – 131.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBates, E., & MacWhinney, B. ( 1987 ). Competition, variation, and language learning. In B. MacWhinney ( Ed. ), Mechanisms of language acquisition ( pp. 157 – 193 ). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBoyd, J. K., & Goldberg, A. E. ( 2009 ). Input effects within a constructionist framework. Modern Language Journal, 93, 418–429.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrown, R. ( 1973 ). A first language: The early stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChristiansen, M. H., & Chater, N. ( Eds. ). ( 2001 ). Connectionist psycholinguistics. Westport, CT: Ablex.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChristiansen, M. H., & Chater, N. ( 2008 ). Language as shaped by the brain. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 31, 489 – 509.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCohen, H., & Lefebvre, C. ( Eds. ). ( 2005 ). Handbook of categorization in cognitive science. Mahwah, NJ: Elsevier.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCollins, L. ( 2002 ). The roles of L1 influence and lexical aspect in the acquisition of temporal morphology. Language Learning, 52, 43 – 94.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCollins, L., Trofimovich, P., White, J., Cardoso, W., & Horst, M. ( 2009 ). Some input on the easy/difficult grammar question: An empirical study. Modern Language Journal, 93, 336 – 353.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCroft, W. ( 2001 ). Radical construction grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDulay, H. C., & Burt, M. K. ( 1974 ). Natural sequences in child second language acquisition. Language Learning, 24, 37 – 53.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceElio, R., & Anderson, J. R. ( 1981 ). The effects of category generalizations and instance similarity on schema abstraction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 7, 397 – 417.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceElio, R., & Anderson, J. R. ( 1984 ). The effects of information order and learning mode on schema abstraction. Memory & Cognition, 12, 20 – 30.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEllis, N. C. ( 2002 ). Frequency effects in language processing: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 143 – 188.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEllis, N. C. ( 2006a ). Language acquisition as rational contingency learning. Applied Linguistics, 27, 1 – 24.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEllis, N. C. ( 2006b ). Selective attention and transfer phenomena in SLA: Contingency, cue competition, salience, interference, overshadowing, blocking, and perceptual learning. Applied Linguistics, 27, 164 – 194.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEllis, N. C. ( 2008a ). The dynamics of second language emergence: Cycles of language use, language change, and language acquisition. Modern Language Journal, 92, 232 – 249.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEllis, N. C. ( 2008b ). Optimizing the input: Frequency and sampling in usage-based and form-focussed learning. In M. H. Long & C. Doughty ( Eds. ), Handbook of second and foreign language teaching ( pp. 139 – 158 ). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEllis, N. C. ( 2008c ). Usage-based and form-focused language acquisition: The associative learning of constructions, learned-attention, and the limited L2 endstate. In P. Robinson & N. C. Ellis ( Eds. ), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition ( pp. 372 – 405 ). London: Routledge.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEllis, N. C. ( 2008d ). Temporal cognition and temporal language the first and second times around. Commentary on McCormack and Hoerl. Language Learning, 58 ( Suppl. 1 ), 115 – 121.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEllis, N. C., & Ferreira-Junior, F. ( 2009 ). Construction learning as a function of frequency, frequency distribution, and function. Modern Language Journal, 93, 370 – 385.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEllis, N. C., & Larsen-Freeman, D. ( 2006 ). Language emergence: Implications for Applied Linguistics (Introduction to the Special Issue). Applied Linguistics, 27, 558 – 589.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEllis, N. C., & Larsen-Freeman, D. ( 2009 ). Language as a complex adaptive system. Language Learning, 59 ( Suppl. 1 ).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEvans, V. ( 2003 ). The structure of time: Language, meaning and temporal cognition. Amsterdam: Benjamins.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGarside, R., & Smith, N. ( 1997 ). A hybrid grammatical tagger: CLAWS4. In R. Garside, G. Leech, & A. McEnery ( Eds. ), Corpus annotation: Linguistic information from computer text corpora ( pp. 102 – 121 ). London: Longman.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGoldberg, A. E. ( 1995 ). Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: Chicago University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGoldberg, A. E. ( 2003 ). Constructions: A new theoretical approach to language. Trends in Cognitive Science, 7, 219 – 224.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGoldberg, A. E. ( 2006 ). Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGoldberg, A. E., Casenhiser, D. M., & Sethuraman, N. ( 2004 ). Learning argument structure generalizations. Cognitive Linguistics, 15, 289 – 316.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGoldschneider, J. M., & DeKeyser, R. ( 2001 ). Explaining the “natural order of L2 morpheme acquisition” in English: A meta-analysis of multiple determinants. Language Learning, 51, 1 – 50.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGries, St. Th. ( 2004 ). Coll.analysis 3: A program for R for Windows [Computer software]. Author.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGries, St. Th., & Stefanowitsch, A. ( 2004 ). Extending collostructional analysis: A corpus-based perspective on ‘alternations.’ International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 9, 97 – 129.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGries, St. Th., & Wulff, S. ( 2005 ). Do foreign language learners also have constructions? Evidence from priming, sorting, and corpora. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 3, 182 – 200.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGullberg, M., & Indefrey, P. ( 2008a ). Cognitive and neural prerequisites for time in language. Any answers? In M. Gullberg & P. Indefrey ( Eds. ), Time to speak: Cognitive and neural prerequisites of time in language ( pp. 207 – 216 ). Malvern, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGullberg, M., & Indefrey, P. ( Eds. ). ( 2008b ). Time to speak: Cognitive and neural prerequisites of time in language. Malvern, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLi, P., & Shirai, Y. ( 2000 ). The acquisition of lexical and grammatical aspect. Berlin, Germany: Walter de Gruyter.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMacWhinney, B. ( 1987 ). The competition model. In B. MacWhinney ( Ed. ), Mechanisms of language acquisition ( pp. 249 – 308 ). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcCormack, T., & Hoerl, C. ( 2008 ). Temporal decentering and the development of time concepts. Language Learning, 58 ( Suppl. 1 ), 89 – 113.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMurphy, G. L. ( 2003 ). The big book of concepts. Boston: MIT Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNinio, A. ( 1999 ). Pathbreaking verbs in syntactic development and the question of prototypical transitivity. Journal of Child Language, 26, 619 – 653.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNinio, A. ( 2006 ). Language and the learning curve: A new theory of syntactic development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNosofsky, R. M. ( 1988a ). Exemplar-based accounts of relations between classification, recognition, and typicality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 14, 700 – 708.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNosofsky, R. M. ( 1988b ). Similarity, frequency, and the category representation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 14, 54 – 65.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRescorla, R. A. ( 1968 ). Probability of shock in the presence and absence of CS in fear conditioning. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 66, 1 – 5.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRobinson, P., & Ellis, N. C. ( Eds. ). ( 2008 ). A handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition. London: Routledge.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRosch, E., & Mervis, C. B. ( 1975 ). Cognitive representations of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104, 192 – 233.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRosch, E., Mervis, C. B., Gray, W. D., Johnson, D. M., & Boyes-Braem, P. ( 1976 ). Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 8, 382 – 439.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShirai, Y., & Andersen, R. W. ( 1995 ). The acquisition of tense–aspect morphology. Language, 71, 743 – 762.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShirai, Y., Slobin, D. I., & Weist, R. E. ( 1998 ). Introduction: The acquisition of tense–aspect morphology. First Language, 18, 245 – 253.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSimpson, R. C., Briggs, S. L., Ovens, J, & Swales, J. M. ( 2002 ). The Michigan Corpus of Academic Spoken English. Ann Arbor: The Regents of the University of Michigan.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSmith, C. ( 1997 ). The parameter of aspect ( 2nd ed. ). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStefanowitsch, A., & Gries, St. Th. ( 2003 ). Collostructions: Investigating the interaction between words and constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 8, 209 – 243.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTomasello, M. ( 2003 ). Constructing a language. Boston: Harvard University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTversky, A. ( 1977 ). Features of similarity. Psychological Review, 84, 327 – 352.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZipf, G. K. ( 1935 ). The Psycho-biology of language: An introduction to dynamic philology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
j.1540-4781.2009.00895.x.pdf
Size:
4.912MB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.