View Item 

Show simple item record

Species-specific responses of planktivorous fish to the introduction of a new piscivore: implications for prey fitness
dc.contributor.authorHölker, Franzen_US
dc.contributor.authorDörner, Hendriken_US
dc.contributor.authorSchulze, Torstenen_US
dc.contributor.authorHaertel-Borer, Susanne S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorPeacor, Scott D.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMehner, Thomasen_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-01T22:33:30Z
dc.date.available2010-06-01T22:33:30Z
dc.date.issued2007-09en_US
dc.identifier.citationHÖLKER, FRANZ; DÖRNER, HENDRIK; SCHULZE, TORSTEN; HAERTEL-BORER, SUSANNE S.; PEACOR, SCOTT D.; MEHNER, THOMAS (2007). "Species-specific responses of planktivorous fish to the introduction of a new piscivore: implications for prey fitness." Freshwater Biology 52(9): 1793-1806. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/75539>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0046-5070en_US
dc.identifier.issn1365-2427en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/75539
dc.format.extent615040 bytes
dc.format.extent3109 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltden_US
dc.rights2007 The Authors, Journal compilation 2007 Blackwell Publishing Ltden_US
dc.subject.otherFixed Behaviouren_US
dc.subject.otherHabitat Preferenceen_US
dc.subject.otherMultiple Predatoren_US
dc.subject.otherMultiple Preyen_US
dc.subject.otherPhenotypic Plasticityen_US
dc.titleSpecies-specific responses of planktivorous fish to the introduction of a new piscivore: implications for prey fitnessen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEcology and Evolutionary Biologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Fisheries and Wildlife, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, and Great Lakes Environmental Research Laboratory (NOAA), Ann Arbor, MI, U.S.A.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationother* Leibniz-Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries, Berlin, Germanyen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherAGRIFISH Unit, DG Joint Research Centre (JRC), Institute for the Protection and Security of the Citizen (IPSC), European Commission, Ispra, Italyen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherInstitute of Hydrobiology, Technische Universitt Dresden, Dresden, Germanyen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherLimnological Institute, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germanyen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherSwiss Fisheries Advisory Service (FIBER), c/o EAWAG, Kastanienbaum, Switzerlanden_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/75539/1/j.1365-2427.2007.01810.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1365-2427.2007.01810.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceFreshwater Biologyen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBean C.W. & Winfield I.J. ( 1995 ) Habitat use and activity patterns of roach ( Rutilus rutilus L.), rudd ( Scardinius eythrophthalmus L.), perch ( Perca fluviatilis L.) and pike ( Esox lucius L.) in the laboratory: the role of predation threat and structural complexity. Ecology of Freshwater Fish, 4, 37 – 46.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBiro P.A., Post J.R. & Parkinson E.A. ( 2003 ) Population consequences of a predator-induced habitat shift by trout in whole-lake experiments. Ecology, 84, 691 – 700.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrabrand A. & Faafeng B. ( 1993 ) Habitat shift in roach ( Rutilus rutilus ) induced by pikeperch ( Stizostedion lucioperca ) introduction: predation risk versus pelagic behaviour. Oecologia, 95, 38 – 46.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBystrÖm P., Persson L., WahlstrÖm E. & Westman E. ( 2003 ) Size- and density-dependent habitat use in predators: consequences for habitat shifts in young fish. Journal of Animal Ecology, 72, 156 – 168.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCarpenter S.R. ( 1990 ) Large-scale perturbations: opportunities for innovation. Ecology, 71, 2038 – 2043.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCarpenter S.R. ( 1996 ) Microcosm experiments have limited relevance for community and ecosystem ecology. Ecology, 77, 677 – 680.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCarpenter S.R. & Kitchell J.F. ( 1993 ) The Trophic Cascade in Lakes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCaudill C. & Peckarsky B.L. ( 2003 ) Lack of appropriate behavioral or development responses by mayfly larvae to trout predators. Ecology, 84, 2133 – 2144.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChristensen B. & Persson L. ( 1993 ) Species-specific antipredatory behaviors – effects on prey choice in different habitats. Behavioural Ecology and Sociobiology, 32, 1 – 9.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceClavero M. & GarcÍa-Berthou E. ( 2005 ) Invasive species are a leading cause of animal extinctions. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 20, 110.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCraig J.F. ( 1987 ) The Biology of Perch and Related Fish. Croom Helm Ltd., Kent.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCraig J.F. ( 1996 ) Pike: Biology and Exploitation. Chapman & Hall, London.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDÖrner H. & Wagner A. ( 2003 ) Size-dependent predator–prey relationships between perch and their prey. Journal of Fish Biology, 62, 1021 – 1032.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDÖrner H., Schulze T., Mehner T. & HÖlker F. ( 2006 ) The effect of temperature on mortality in small perch marked with coded wire tags. Journal of Fish Biology, 69, 1255 – 1260.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDÖrner H., HÜlsmann S., HÖlker F., Skov C. & Wagner A. ( 2007 ) Size-dependent predator–prey relationships between pikeperch and their prey fish. Ecology of Freshwater Fish, D.O.I.: 10.1111/j.1600-0633.2006.00223.x.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEbenman B. ( 1992 ) Evolution in organisms that change their niches during their life cycle. American Naturalist, 139, 990 – 1021.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEklÖv P. & VanKooten T. ( 2001 ) Facilitation among piscivorous predators: effects of prey habitat use. Ecology, 82, 2486 – 2494.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGliwicz Z.M., Slon J. & Szynkarczyk I. ( 2006 ) Trading safety for food: evidence from gut contents in roach and bleak captured at different distances offshore from their daytime littoral refuge. Freshwater Biology, 51, 823 – 839.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGreenberg L.A., Pazkowski C.A. & Tonn W.M. ( 1995 ) Effects of prey species composition and habitat structure on foraging by two functionally distinct piscivores. Oikos, 74, 522 – 532.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHaertel S.S., Baade U. & Eckmann R. ( 2002 ) No general percid dominance at mesotrophic lake conditions: insights from the quantification of predator–prey interactions. Limnologica, 32, 1 – 13.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHaertel-Borer S.S., Zak D., Eckmann R., Baade U. & HÖlker F. ( 2005 ) Population density of the crayfish, Orconectes limosus, in relation to fish and macroinvertebrate densities in a small mesotrophic lake – implications for the lake's food web. International Review of Hydrobiology, 90, 523 – 533.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHanson P.C., Johnson T.B., Schindler D.E. & Kitchell J.F. ( 1997 ) Fish Bioenergetics 3.0. WI, No. WISCU-T-97-001. Sea Grant Institute, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHÖlker F. & Breckling B. ( 2002 ) Influence of activity in a heterogeneous environment on the dynamics of fish growth: an individual-based model of roach. Journal of Fish Biology, 60, 1170 – 1189.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHÖlker F. & Mehner T. ( 2005 ) Simulation of trait- and density-mediated indirect effects induced by piscivorous predators. Basic and Applied Ecology, 6, 289 – 300.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHÖlker F., Haertel S.S., Steiner S. & Mehner T. ( 2002 ) Effects of piscivores-mediated habitat use on growth, diet and zooplankton consumption of roach: an individual-based modelling approach. Freshwater Biology, 47, 2345 – 2358.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHouston A.I., McNamara J.M. & Hutchinson J.M.C. ( 1993 ) General results concerning the trade-off between gaining energy and avoiding predation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences, 341, 375 – 397.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceIves A.R. & Dobson A.P. ( 1987 ) Antipredator behavior and the population dynamics of simple predator–prey systems. American Naturalist, 130, 431 – 437.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJacobsen L. & Berg S. ( 1998 ) Diel variation in habitat use by planktivores in field enclosure experiments: the effect of submerged macrophytes and predation. Journal of Fish Biology, 53, 1207 – 1219.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJacobsen L. & Perrow M.R. ( 1998 ) Predation risk from piscivorous fish influencing the diel use of macrophytes by planktivorous fish in experimental ponds. Ecology of Freshwater Fish, 7, 78 – 86.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKasprzak P., Gervais F., Adrian R. et al. ( 2000 ) Trophic characterization, pelagic food web structure and comparison of two mesotrophic lakes in Brandenburg (Germany). International Review of Hydrobiology, 85, 167 – 189.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKing M. ( 1995 ) Fisheries Biology, Assessment and Management. Fishing News Books, Blackwell Science, Oxford.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLammens E.H.R.R. & Hoogenboezem W. ( 1991 ) Diets and feeding behaviour. In: Cyprinid Fishes, Systematics, Biology and Exploitation ( Eds I.J. Winfield & J.S. Nelson ), pp. 353 – 376. Chapman & Hall, London.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLangerhans R.B. & DeWitt T.J. ( 2002 ) Plasticity constrained: overgeneralized induction cues cause maladaptive phenotypes. Evolutionary Ecology Research, 4, 857 – 870.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLima S.L. ( 1998 ) Stress and decision-making under the risk of predation: recent developments from behavioral, reproductive, and ecological perspectives. Advances in the Study of Behaviour, 27, 215 – 290.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLima S.L. & Dill L.M. ( 1990 ) Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 68, 619 – 640.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcPeek M.A., Schrot A.K. & Brown J.M. ( 1996 ) Adaptation to predators in a new community: swimming performance and predator avoidance in damselflies. Ecology, 77, 617 – 629.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMehner T., Arlinghaus R., Berg S. et al. ( 2004 ) How to link biomanipulation and sustainable fisheries management: a step-by-step guideline for lakes of the European temperate zone. Fisheries Management and Ecology, 11, 261 – 275.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMehner T., Diekmann M., BrÄmick U. & Lemcke R. ( 2005 ) Composition of fish communities in German lakes as related to lake morphology, trophic state, shore structure and human-use intensity. Freshwater Biology, 50, 70 – 85.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMiner B.G., Sultan S.E., Morgan S.G., Padilla D.K. & Relyea R.A. ( 2005 ) Ecological consequences of phenotypic plasticity. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 20, 685 – 692.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOkun N. & Mehner T. ( 2005 ) Distribution and feeding of juvenile fish on invertebrates in littoral reed (Phragmites) stands. Ecology of Freshwater Fish, 14, 139 – 149.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePersson L. ( 1986 ) Effects of reduced interspecific competition on resource utilization in perch ( Perca fluviatilis ). Ecology, 67, 355 – 364.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePersson L., Andersson J., Wahlstrom E. & EklÖv P. ( 1996 ) Size-specific interactions in lake systems: predator gape limitation and prey growth rate and mortality. Ecology, 77, 900 – 911.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePollock K.H., Nichols J.D., Brownie C. & Hines J.E. ( 1990 ) Statistical inference for capture–recapture experiments. Wildlife Monographs, 107, 1 – 97.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePost J.R. & McQueen D.J. ( 1988 ) Ontogenetic changes in the distribution of larval and juvenile yellow perch ( Perca flavescens ): a response to prey or predators? Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 45, 1820 – 1826.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceReebs S.G. ( 2002 ) Plasticity of diel and circadian activity rhythms in fishes. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, 12, 349 – 371.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRelyea R.A. ( 2001 ) Morphological and behavioral plasticity of larval anurans in response to different predators. Ecology, 82, 523 – 540.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRelyea R.A. ( 2003 ) How prey respond to combined predators: a review and an empirical test. Ecology, 84, 827 – 1839.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRiechert S.E. ( 1993 ) A test for phylogenetic constraints on behavioural adaptation in a spider system. Behavioural Ecology and Sociobiology, 32, 343 – 348.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceScheffer M. ( 1998 ) Ecology of Shallow Lakes. Chapman and Hall, London.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchmitz O.J., Krivan V. & Ovadia O. ( 2004 ) Trophic cascades: the primacy of trait-mediated indirect interactions. Ecology Letters, 7, 153 – 163.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchulze T., DÖrner H., HÖlker F. & Mehner T. ( 2006b ) Determinants of habitat use in large roach. Journal of Fish Biology, 69, 1136 – 1150.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchulze T., Baade U., DÖrner H., Eckmann R., Haertel-Borer S.S., HÖlker F. & Mehner T. ( 2006a ) Interactions of residential piscivores with an introduced new predator type in a mesotrophic lake. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 63, 2202 – 2212.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSih A. ( 1987 ) Predators and prey life style. In: Predation: Direct and Indirect Impacts on Aquatic Communities ( Eds W.C. Kerfoot & A. Sih ), pp. 203 – 224. University Press of New England, Hanover, Germany.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSih A., Bell A.M. & Johnson J.C. ( 2004 ) Behavioral syndromes: an ecological and evolutionary overview. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 19, 372 – 378.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSih A., Kats L.B. & Maurer E.F. ( 2000 ) Does phylogenetic inertia explain the evolution of ineffective antipredator behavior in a sunfish–salamander system? Behavioural Ecology and Sociobiology, 49, 48 – 56.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStearns S.C. ( 1989 ) The evolutionary significance of phenotypic plasticity. BioScience, 39, 436 – 445.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStief P. & HÖlker F. ( 2006 ) Trait-mediated indirect effects of predatory fish on microbial mineralization in aquatic sediments. Ecology, 87, 3152 – 3159.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTollrian R. & Harvell C.D. (Eds) ( 1999 ) The Ecology and Evolution of Inducible Defenses. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWerner E.E. & Anholt B.R. ( 1993 ) Ecological consequences of the trade-off between growth and mortality rates mediated by foraging activity. American Naturalist, 142, 242 – 272.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWerner E.E. & Peacor S.D. ( 2003 ) A review of trait-mediated indirect interactions in ecological communities. Ecology, 84, 1083 – 1100.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWhite G.C., Anderson D.R., Burnham K.P. & Otis D.L. ( 1982 ) Capture–Recapture and Removal Methods for Sampling Closed Populations. Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWohlfahrt B., Mikolajewski D.J., Joop G. & Suhling F. ( 2006 ) Are behavioural traits in prey sensitive to the risk imposed by predatory fish? Freshwater Biology, 51, 76 – 84.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZardoya R. & Doadrio I. ( 1999 ) Molecular evidence on the evolutionary and biogeographical patterns of European cyprinids. Journal of Molecular Evolution, 49, 227 – 237.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
j.1365-2427.2007.01810.x.pdf
Size:
600.6KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.