Show simple item record

Root competition can cause a decline in diversity with increased productivity

dc.contributor.authorRajaniemi, Tara K.en_US
dc.contributor.authorAllison, Victoria J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorGoldberg, Deborah E.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-01T22:33:37Z
dc.date.available2010-06-01T22:33:37Z
dc.date.issued2003-06en_US
dc.identifier.citationRajaniemi, Tara K.; Allison, Victoria J.; Goldberg, Deborah E. (2003). "Root competition can cause a decline in diversity with increased productivity." Journal of Ecology 91(3): 407-416. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/75541>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0022-0477en_US
dc.identifier.issn1365-2745en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/75541
dc.description.abstract1  Plant community theory often invokes competition to explain why species diversity declines as productivity increases. Competition for all resources might become more intense and lead to greater competitive exclusion or, alternatively, competition for light only could become more intense and exclude poor light competitors. 2  To test these hypotheses, we constructed communities of seven old-field species using combined monocultures. Constructs experienced no interspecific competition, only shoot competition or only root competition, with and without fertilizer. Diversity in these limited interaction communities was compared to diversity in unfertilized and fertilized mixtures of the seven species. 3  Diversity decreased with fertilization in mixtures and in communities with only root competition. Shoot competition had small effects on the community and did not contribute to changes in diversity with fertilization. 4  Root competition may strongly impact plant community structure in unproductive communities where light never becomes limiting, or under non-equilibrium conditions following human disturbances.en_US
dc.format.extent331517 bytes
dc.format.extent3109 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherBlackwell Science Ltden_US
dc.rights© 2003 British Ecological Societyen_US
dc.subject.otherCommunity Structureen_US
dc.subject.otherFertilizationen_US
dc.subject.otherOld Fielden_US
dc.subject.otherNull Communityen_US
dc.subject.otherCombined Monocultures Designen_US
dc.titleRoot competition can cause a decline in diversity with increased productivityen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEcology and Evolutionary Biologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USAen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/75541/1/j.1365-2745.2003.00768.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1046/j.1365-2745.2003.00768.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Ecologyen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAbul-Fatih, H.A. & Bazzaz, F.A. ( 1979 ) The biology of Ambrosia trifida L. I. Influence of species removal on the organization of the plant community. New Phytologist, 83, 813 – 816.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAllen, E.B. & Forman, R.T.T. ( 1976 ) Plant species removals and old-field community structure and stability. Ecology, 57, 1233 – 1243.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAllison, V.J. ( 2001 ) Direct and indirect effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on plant community composition. PhD Dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAllison, V.J. & Goldberg, D.E. ( 2002 ) Species-level versus community-level patterns of mycorrhizal dependence on phosphorus: an example of Simpson's paradox. Functional Ecology, 16, 346 – 352.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceArmesto, J.J. & Pickett, S.T.A. ( 1986 ) Removal experiments to test mechanisms of plant succession in oldfields. Vegetatio, 66, 85 – 93.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAustin, M.P. ( 1982 ) Use of a relative physiological performance value in the prediction of performance in multispecies mixtures from monoculture performance. Journal of Ecology, 70, 559 – 570.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAustin, M.P. & Austin, B.O. ( 1980 ) Behaviour of experimental plant communities along a nutrient gradient. Journal of Ecology, 68, 891 – 918.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBelcher, J.W., Keddy, P.A. & Twolan-Strutt, L. ( 1995 ) Root and shoot competition intensity along a soil depth gradient. Journal of Ecology, 83, 673 – 682.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBelsky, A.J. ( 1992 ) Effects of grazing, competition, disturbance and fire on species composition and diversity in grassland communities. Journal of Vegetation Science, 3, 187 – 200.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBobbink, R., During, H.J., Schreurs, J., Willems, J. & Zielman, R. ( 1987 ) Effects of selective clipping and mowing time on species diversity in chalk grassland. Folia Geobotanica and Phytotaxonomica, 22, 363 – 376.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCahill, J.F. ( 1999 ) Fertilization effects on interactions between above- and belowground competition in an old field. Ecology, 80, 466 – 480.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCahill, J.F. ( 2002 ) What evidence is necessary in studies which separate root and shoot competition along productivity gradients? Journal of Ecology, 90, 201 – 205.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCarson, W.P. & Pickett, S.T.A. ( 1990 ) Role of resources and disturbance in the organization of an old-field plant community. Ecology, 71, 226 – 238.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDiTommaso, A. & Aarssen, L.W. ( 1989 ) Resource manipulations in natural vegetation: a review. Vegetatio, 84, 9 – 29.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGibson, D.J. ( 1988 ) The maintenance of plant and soil heterogeneity in dune grassland. Journal of Ecology, 76, 497 – 508.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGoldberg, D.E. ( 1994 ) Influence of competition at the community level: an experimental version of the null models approach. Ecology, 75, 1503 – 1506.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGoldberg, D.E. & Estabrook, G. ( 1998 ) Separating the effects of number of individuals sampled and competition on species diversity: an experimental and analytical approach. Journal of Ecology, 86, 983 – 988.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGoldberg, D.E. & Miller, T.E. ( 1990 ) Effects of different resource additions on species diversity in an annual plant community. Ecology, 71, 213 – 225.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGough, L., Osenberg, C.W., Gross, K.L. & Collins, S.L. ( 2000 ) Fertilization effects on species density and primary productivity in several herbaceous plant communities. Oikos, 89, 428 – 439.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGrime, J.P. ( 1977 ) Evidence for the existence of three primary strategies in plants and its relevance to ecological and evolutionary theory. American Naturalist, 111, 1169 – 1194.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGurevitch, J. & Unnasch, R.S. ( 1989 ) Experimental removal of a dominant species at two levels of soil fertility. Canadian Journal of Botany, 67, 3470 – 3477.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHils, M.H. & Vankat, J.L. ( 1982 ) Species removals from a first-year old-field plant community. Ecology, 63, 705 – 711.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHuston, M. ( 1979 ) A general hypothesis of species diversity. American Naturalist, 113, 81 – 101.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJefferies, R.L. & Maron, J.L. ( 1997 ) The embarrassment of riches: atmospheric deposition of nitrogen and community and ecosystem processes. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 12, 74 – 78.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKeddy, P.A. ( 1989 ) Effects of competition from shrubs on herbaceous wetland plants: a 4-year field experiment. Canadian Journal of Botany, 67, 708 – 716.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLeps, J. ( 1999 ) Nutrient status, disturbance and competition: an experimental test of relationships in a wet meadow. Journal of Vegetation Science, 10, 219 – 230.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMittelbach, G.G., Steiner, C.F., Scheiner, S.M., Gross, K.L., Reynolds, H.L., Waide, R.B., Willig, M.R., Dodson, S.I. & Gough, L. ( 2001 ) What is the observed relationship between species richness and productivity? Ecology, 82, 2381 – 2396.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNewman, E.I. ( 1973 ) Competition and diversity in herbaceous vegetation. Nature, 244, 310 – 311.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePeltzer, D.A., Wilson, S.D. & Gerry, A.K. ( 1998 ) Competition intensity along a productivity gradient in a low-diversity grassland. American Naturalist, 151, 465 – 476.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePinder, J.E. ( 1975 ) Effects of species removal on an old-field plant community. Ecology, 56, 747 – 751.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRajaniemi, T.K. ( 2001 ) Explaining the productivity-diversity relationship in plants: changing effects of competition on the community. PhD Dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRajaniemi, T.K. ( 2002 ) Why does fertilization reduce plant species diversity? Testing three competition-based hypotheses. Journal of Ecology, 90, 316 – 324.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRajaniemi, T.K. ( 2003a ) Explaining productivity-diversity relationships in plants in press. Oikos, 101, 449 – 457.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRajaniemi, T.K. ( 2003b ) Evidence for size asymmetry of belowground competition in press. Basic and Applied Ecology, 4, 239 – 247.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRosenzweig, M.L. & Abramsky, Z. ( 1993 ) How are diversity and productivity related? Species Diversity in Ecological Communities: Historical and Geographyraphical Perspectives (eds R.E. Ricklefs & D. Schluter ), pp. 52 – 65. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchwinning, S. & Fox, G.A. ( 1995 ) Population dynamic consequences of competitive symmetry in annual plants. Oikos, 72, 422 – 432.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchwinning, S. & Weiner, J. ( 1998 ) Mechanisms determining the degree of size asymmetry in competition among plants. Oecologia, 113, 447 – 455.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSmith, M.D., Hartnett, D.C. & Wilson, G.W.T. ( 1999 ) Interacting influence of mycorrhizal symbiosis and competition on plant diversity in tallgrass prairie. Oecologia, 121, 574 – 582.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSpackova, I., Kotorova, I. & Leps, J. ( 1998 ) Sensitivity of seedling recruitment to moss, litter and dominant removal in an oligotrophic wet meadow. Folia Geobotanica, 33, 17 – 30.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStevens, M.H.H. & Carson, W.P. ( 1999a ) Plant density determines species richness along an experimental fertility gradient. Ecology, 80, 455 – 465.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStevens, M.H.H. & Carson, W.P. ( 1999b ) The significance of assemblage-level thinning for species richness. Journal of Ecology, 87, 490 – 502.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTilman, D. ( 1988 ) Plant Strategies and the Dynamics and Structure of Plant Communities. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTilman, D. & Pacala, S. ( 1993 ) The maintenance of species richness in plant communities. Species Diversity in Ecological Communities: Historical and Geographyraphical Perspectives (eds R.E. Ricklefs & D. Schluter ), pp. 13 – 25. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTwolan-Strutt, L. & Keddy, P.A. ( 1996 ) Above- and belowground competition intensity in two contrasting wetland plant communities. Ecology, 77, 259 – 270.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVoss, E.G. ( 1972 ) Michigan Flora: A Guide to the Identification and Occurrence of the Native and Naturalized Seed-Plants of the State. Part I. Monocots. Cranbrook Institute of Science, Bloomfield Hills, MI.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVoss, E.G. ( 1985 ) Michigan Flora: A Guide to the Identification and Occurrence of the Native and Naturalized Seed-Plants of the State. Part II. Dicots (Sauraceae – Cornaceae). Cranbrook Institute of Science, Bloomfield Hills, MI.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVoss, E.G. ( 1996 ) Michigan Flora: A Guide to the Identification and Occurrence of the Native and Naturalized Seed-Plants of the State. Part III. Dicots (Pyrolaceae – Compositae). Cranbrook Institute of Science, Bloomfield Hill, MI.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWaide, R.B., Willig, M.R., Steiner, C.F., Mittelbach, G., Gough, L., Dodson, S.I., Juday, G.P. & Parmenter, R. ( 1999 ) The relationship between productivity and species richness. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 30, 257 – 300.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWardle, D.A., Bonner, K.I., Barker, G.M., Yeates, G.W., Nicholson, K.S., Bardgett, R.D., Watson, R.N. & Ghani, A. ( 1999 ) Plant removals in perennial grassland: vegetation dynamics, decomposers, soil biodiversity, and ecosystem properties. Ecological Monographs, 69, 535 – 568.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWilson, S.D. ( 1993 ) Belowground competition in forest and prairie. Oikos, 68, 146 – 150.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWilson, S.D. & Tilman, D. ( 1991 ) Components of plant competition along an experimental gradient of nitrogen availability. Ecology, 72, 1050 – 1065.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWilson, S.D. & Tilman, D. ( 1993 ) Plant competition and resource availability in response to disturbance and fertilization. Ecology, 74, 599 – 611.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZamfir, M. & Goldberg, D.E. ( 2000 ) The effect of initial density on interactions between bryophytes at individual and community levels. Journal of Ecology, 88, 243 – 255.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZobel, M. ( 1992 ) Plant species coexistence – the role of historical, evolutionary and ecological factors. Oikos, 65, 314 – 320.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZobel, M. & Zobel, K. ( 2002 ) Studying plant competition: from root biomass to general aims. Journal of Ecology, 90, 578 – 580.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.