Show simple item record

Response and Modeling of Cantilever Retaining Walls Subjected to Seismic Motions

dc.contributor.authorGreen, Russell A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorOlgun, C. Guneyen_US
dc.contributor.authorCameron, Wanda I.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-01T22:34:12Z
dc.date.available2010-06-01T22:34:12Z
dc.date.issued2008-05en_US
dc.identifier.citationGreen, Russell A.; Olgun, C. Guney; Cameron, Wanda I. (2008). "Response and Modeling of Cantilever Retaining Walls Subjected to Seismic Motions." Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering 23(4): 309-322. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/75550>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1093-9687en_US
dc.identifier.issn1467-8667en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/75550
dc.description.abstractA series of nonlinear, explicit finite difference analyses were performed to determine the dynamic response of a cantilever retaining wall subjected to earthquake motions. This article outlines the calibration and validation of the numerical model used in the analyses and comparisons are presented between the results from the finite difference analyses and results from simplified techniques for computing dynamic earth pressures and permanent wall displacement (i.e., Mononobe-Okabe and Newmark sliding block methods). It was found that at very low levels of acceleration, the induced pressures were in general agreement with those predicted by the Mononobe-Okabe method. However, as the accelerations increased to those expected in regions of moderate seismicity, the induced pressures are larger than those predicted by the Mononobe-Okabe method. This deviation is attributed to the flexibility of the retaining wall system and to the observation that the driving soil wedge does not respond monolithically, but rather responds as several wedges. Additionally, it was found that the critical load case for the structural design of the wall differed from that for the global stability of the wall, contrary to the common assumption made in practice that the two load cases are the same .en_US
dc.format.extent1632841 bytes
dc.format.extent3109 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Incen_US
dc.rights2008 Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineeringen_US
dc.titleResponse and Modeling of Cantilever Retaining Walls Subjected to Seismic Motionsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelCivil and Environmental Engineeringen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelEngineeringen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Michigan, 2372 G.G. Brown, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-2125, USAen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/75550/1/j.1467-8667.2007.00538.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1467-8667.2007.00538.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceComputer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineeringen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAitken, G. H. ( 1982 ), Seismic Response of Retaining Walls, MS Thesis, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAndersen, G. A., Whitman, R. V. & Germaine, J. T. ( 1991 ), Seismic response of rigid tilting walls, in Proceedings of Centrifuge'91, Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, pp. 417 – 24.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEbeling, R. M. & Filz, G. M. ( 2001 ), Soil-Structure Interaction Analysis of Rock-founded Cantilever and Mass Concrete Retaining Walls, Draft Report, US Army Corps of Engineers, Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, MS.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEbeling, R. M. & Morrison, E. E. ( 1992 ), The Seismic Design of Waterfront Retaining Structures, US Army Technical Report ITL-92-11, US Navy Technical Report NCEL TR-939, US Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFinn, W. D. L. ( 1988 ), Dynamic analyses in geotechnical engineering, in J. L. Von Thun ( ed.), Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics II—Recent Advances in Ground-Motion Evaluation, Geotechnical Special Publication 20, ASCE, pp. 523–91.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGomez, J. E., Filz, G. M. & Ebeling, R. M. ( 2000a ), Extended Load/Unload/Reload Hyperbolic Model for Interfaces: Parameter Values and Model Performance for the Contact between Concrete and Coarse Sand, ERDC/ITL TR-00-7, US Army Corps of Engineers, Engineer Research and Development Center.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGomez, J. E., Filz, G. M. & Ebeling, R. M. ( 2000b ), Development of an Improved Numerical Model for Concrete-to-Soil Interfaces in Soil-Structure Interaction Analyses, Report 2, Final Study, ERDC/ITL TR-99-1, US Army Corps of Engineers, Engineer Research and Development Center.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGreen, R. A. & Ebeling, R. M. ( 2002 ), Seismic Analysis of Cantilever Retaining Walls, Phase 1, ERDC/ITL TR-02-3, US Army Corps of Engineers, Engineer Research and Development Center, http://www-personal.umich.edu/~rugreen/papers/ITL-TR-02-3.pdf.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGreen, R. A. & Michalowski, R. L. ( 2006 ), Shear band formation behind retaining structures subjected to seismic excitation, Foundations of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 7, 157 – 69.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGreen, R. A., Olgun, C. G., Ebeling, R. M. & Cameron, W. I. ( 2003 ), Seismically induced lateral earth pressures on a cantilever retaining wall, in J. E. Beavers ( ed.), Advancing Mitigation Technologies and Disaster Response for Lifeline Systems, ASCE Technical Council on Lifeline Earthquake Engineering Monograph No. 25, pp. 946 – 55.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHeadquarters, US Army Corps of Engineers. ( 1989 ), Retaining and Flood Walls, EM 1110-2-2502, Washington DC.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHeadquarters, US Army Corps of Engineers. ( 1992 ), Strength Design for Reinforced-Concrete Hydraulic Structures, EM 1110-2-2104, Washington DC.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceIdriss, I. M. & Sun, J. I. ( 1992 ), User's Manual for SHAKE91: A Computer Program for Conducting Equivalent Linear Seismic Response Analyses of Horizontally Layered Soil Deposits, Center for Geotechnical Modeling, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Davis, CA.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceItasca. ( 2000 ), FLAC (Fast Lagrangian Analysis of Continua) User's Manuals, Itasca Consulting Group, Minneapolis, MN.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJaky, J. ( 1944 ), The coefficient of earth pressure at rest, Magyar Menok es Epitesz Kozloi (Journal of the Society of Hungarian Architects and Engineers), October, 355 – 358.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKuhlemeyer, R. L. & Lysmer, J. ( 1973 ), Finite element method accuracy for wave propagation problems, Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, 99 ( SM5 ), 421 – 27.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLysmer, J., Udaka, T., Tsai, C.-F. & Seed, H. B. ( 1975 ), FLUSH: A Computer Program for Approximate 3-D Analysis of Soil-Structure Interaction Problems, EERC Report No. EERC-75-30, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, CA.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMacGregor, J. G. ( 1992 ), Reinforced Concrete Mechanics and Design, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMononobe, N. & Matsuo, H. ( 1929 ), On the determination of earth pressures during earthquakes, in Proceedings: World Engineering Congress, 9, 177 – 85.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNadim, F. & Whitman, R. V. ( 1983 ), Seismically induced movements of retaining walls, Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, 109 ( 7 ), 915 – 31.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNewmark, N. M. ( 1965 ), Effects of earthquakes on dams and embankments, Geotechnique, 15 ( 2 ), 139 – 60.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNi, B. ( 2007 ), Implementation of a bubble model in FLAC and its application in dynamic analysis, Ph.D. thesis, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOkabe, S. ( 1924 ), General theory of earth pressures, Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineering, 10 ( 6 ), 1277 – 323, plus figures.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOstadan, F. ( 2005 ), Seismic soil pressure for building walls: An updated approach, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 25, 785 – 93.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePaulay, T. & Priestley, M. J. N. ( 1992 ), Seismic Design of Reinforced Concrete and Masonry Buildings, John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRichards, R., Jr. & Elms, D. G. ( 1979 ), Seismic behavior of gravity retaining walls, Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, 105 ( 4 ), 449 – 69.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSeed, H. B. & Whitman, R. V. ( 1970 ), Design of Earth Retaining Structures for Dynamic Loads, Lateral Stresses in the Ground and Design of Earth-Retaining Structures, ASCE, 103 – 47.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStokoe, K. H., II, Wright, S. G., Bay, J. A. & Roesset, J. M. ( 1994 ), Characterization of geotechnical sites by SASW method, in R. D. Woods ( ed. ), Geophysical Characterization of Sites, Oxford and IBH Publishing, New Delhi, 15 – 25.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTerzaghi, K. ( 1943 ), Theoretical Soil Mechanics, John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVeletsos, A. & Younan, A. H. ( 1994 ), Dynamic soil pressure on rigid vertical walls, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 23, 275 – 301.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWang, Z. L. & Makdisi, F. I. ( 1999 ), Implementing a boundary surface hypoplasticity model for sand into FLAC program, in Detoumay & Hart ( eds. ), FLAC and Numerical Modeling in Geomechanics, Balkema, Rotterdam, pp. 483 – 90.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWood, J. H. ( 1973 ), Earthquake induced soil pressures on structures, Ph.D. thesis, EERL 73-05, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWoods, R. D. ( 1994 ), Borehole methods in shallow seismic exploration, in R. D. Woods ( ed.), Geophysical Characterization of Sites, Oxford and IBH Publishing, New Delhi, pp. 91 – 100.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWu, G. & Finn, W. D. L. ( 1999 ), Seismic lateral pressures for design of rigid walls, Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 36, 509 – 22.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.