View Item 

Show simple item record

Current diagnosis and treatment algorithms for anal incontinence
dc.contributor.authorRogers, Rebecca G.en_US
dc.contributor.authorAbed, Husamen_US
dc.contributor.authorFenner, Dee E.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-01T22:41:42Z
dc.date.available2010-06-01T22:41:42Z
dc.date.issued2006-09en_US
dc.identifier.citationROGERS, REBECCA G.; ABED, HUSAM; FENNER, DEE E. (2006). "Current diagnosis and treatment algorithms for anal incontinence." BJU International 98(s1): 97-106. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/75666>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1464-4096en_US
dc.identifier.issn1464-410Xen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/75666
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=16911614&dopt=citationen_US
dc.format.extent145442 bytes
dc.format.extent3109 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltden_US
dc.rights© 2006 THE AUTHORS; JOURNAL COMPILATION © 2006 BJU INTERNATIONALen_US
dc.subject.otherFecal Incontinenceen_US
dc.subject.otherAnal Sphincteren_US
dc.subject.otherQuality of Lifeen_US
dc.titleCurrent diagnosis and treatment algorithms for anal incontinenceen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelInternal Medicine and Specialtiesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationum* Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USAen_US
dc.identifier.pmid16911614en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/75666/1/j.1464-410X.2006.06307.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06307.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceBJU Internationalen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNorton C, Christianson I, Butler U et al. Anal incontinence. In Abrams, P, Cardozo, L, Khoury, S, Wein, A eds, Incontinence, 2nd edn. The International Consultation on Incontinence, 2001. Paris: Health Publications Ltd., 2002en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBoreham MK, Richter HE, Kenton KS et al. Anal incontinence in women presenting for gynecologic care: prevalence, risk factors, and impact upon quality of life. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 192: 1637 – 42en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNelson R, Furner S, Jesudason V. Fecal incontinence in Wisconsin nursing homes: prevalence and associations. Dis Colon Rectum 1998; 41: 1226 – 9en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDavis K, Kumar D. Posterior pelvic floor compartment disorders. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2005; 19: 941 – 58en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDeutekom M, Dobben AC, Dijkgraaf MG, Terra MP, Stoker J, Bossuyt PM. Costs of outpatients with fecal incontinence. Scand J Gastroenterol 2005; 40: 552 – 8en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSultan AH, Kamm MA, Hudson CN, Thomas JM, Bartram CI. Anal-sphincter disruption during vaginal delivery. N Engl J Med 1993; 329: 1905 – 11en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEason E, Labrecque M, Marcoux S, Mondor M. Anal incontinence after childbirth. CMAJ 2002; 166: 326 – 30en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHanda VL, Danielson BH, Gilbert WM. Obstetric anal sphincter lacerations. Obstet Gynecol 2001; 98: 225 – 30en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZetterstrom J, Lopez A, Anzen B, Norman M, Holstrom B, Mellgren A. Anal sphincter tears at vaginal delivery: risk factors and clinical outcome of primary repair. Obstet Gynecol 1999; 94: 21 – 8en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFitzpatrick M, Behan M, O’Connell PR, O’Herlihy C. A randomized clinical trial comparing primary overlap with approximation repair of third-degree obstetric tears. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 183: 1220 – 4en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVarma A, Gunn J, Gardiner A, Lindow SW, Duthie GS. Obstetric anal sphincter injury: prospective evaluation and incidence. Dis Colon Rectum 1999; 42: 1537 – 43en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFenner DE, Genberg B, Brahma P, Marek L, DeLancey JO. Fecal and urinary incontinence after vaginal delivery with anal sphincter disruption in an obstetrics unit in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 189: 1543 – 9en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePollack J, Nordenstam J, Brismar S, Lopez A, Altman D, Zetterstrom. J. Anal incontinence after vaginal delivery. a five-year prospective cohort study. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 104: 1397 – 402en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSultan AH, Kamm MA, Hudson CN, Bartram CI. Third degree obstetric anal sphincter tears: risk factors and outcomes of primary repair. BMJ 1994; 308: 887 – 91en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLal M, Mann C, Callender R, Radley S. Does cesarean delivery prevent anal incontinence? Obstet Gynecol 2003; 101: 305 – 12en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencevan Brummen HJ, Bruinse HW, van de Pol G, Heintz AP, van der Vaart CH. Defecatory symptoms during and after the first pregnancy: prevalences and associated factors. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2006; 17: 224 – 30en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMuller C, Belyaev O, Deska T, Chromik A, Weyhe D, Uhl W. Fecal incontinence: an up-to-date critical overview of surgical treatment options. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2005; 390: 544 – 52en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHsu Y, Fenner DE, Weadock WJ, DeLancey JO. Magnetic resonance imaging and 3-dimensional analysis of external anal sphincter anatomy. Obstet Gynecol 2005; 106: 1259 – 65en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDelancey JO, Toglia MR, Perucchini D. Internal and external anal sphincter anatomy as it relates to midline obstetric lacerations. Obstet Gynecol 1997; 90: 924 – 7en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTjandra JJ, Lim JF, Matzel K. Sacral nerve stimulation: an emerging treatment for faecal incontinence. ANZ J Surg 2004; 74: 1098 – 106en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBaxter NN, Rothenberger DA, Lowry AC. Measuring fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 2003; 46: 1591 – 605en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLeigh RJ, Turnberg LA. Faecal incontinence: the unvoiced symptom. Lancet 1982; 1: 1349 – 51en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMinor PB Jr. Economic and personal impact of fecal and urinary incontinence. Gastroenterology 2004; 126: S14 – 22en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJorge JM, Wexner SD. Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 1993; 36: 77 – 97en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCasal E, San Ildefonso A, Carracedo R, Facal C, Sanchez JA. Artificial bowel sphincter in severe anal incontinence. Colorectal Dis 2004; 6: 180 – 4en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePescatori M, Anastasio G, Bottini C, Mentasti A. New grading system and scoring for anal incontinence. Evaluation of 335 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 1992; 35: 482 – 7en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVaizey CJ, Carapeti E, Cahill JA, Kamm MA. Prospective comparison of faecal incontinencne grading systems. Gut 1999; 44: 77 – 80en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRockwood TH, Church JM, Fleshman JW et al. Patient and surgeon ranking of the severity of symptoms associated with fecal incontinence: the fecal incontinence severity index. Dis Colon Rectum 1999; 42: 1525 – 31en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBarber MD, Walters MD, Bump RC. Short forms of two condition-specific quality-of-life questionnaires for women with pelvic floor disorders (PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7). Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 193: 103 – 13en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRockwood TH, Church JM, Fleshman JW et al. Fecal incontinence quality of life scale: quality of life instrument for patients with fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 2000; 43: 9 – 16en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBug GJ, Kiff ES, Hosker G. A new condition-specific health-related quality of life questionnaire for the assessment of women with anal incontinence. BJOG 2001; 108: 1057 – 67en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKwon S, Visco AG, Fitzgerald MP, Ye W, Whitehead WE; Pelvic Floor Disorders Network (PFDN). Validity and reliability of the Modified Manchester Health questionnaire in assessing patients with fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 2005; 48: 323 – 34en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHallan RI, Marzouk DE, Waldron DJ, Womack NR, Willliams NS. Comparison of digital and manometric assessment of anal sphincter function. Br J Surg 1989; 76: 973 – 5en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKeating JP, Stewart PJ, Eyers AA, Warner D, Bokey EL. Are special investigations of value in the management of patients with fecal incontinence? Dis Colon Rectum 1997; 40: 896 – 901en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrink CA, Wells TJ, Sampselle CM, Taillie ER, Mayer R. A digital test for pelvic floor muscle strength in women with urinary incontinence. Nurs Res 1994; 43: 352 – 6en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRotholtz NA, Wexner SD. Surgical treatment of constipation and fecal incontinence. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2001; 30: 131 – 66en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBeets-Tan RG, Morren GI, Beets GL et al. Measurement of anal sphincter muscles: endoanal US, endoanal MRI or phased-array MR imaging? A study with health volunteers. Radiology 2001; 220: 81 – 9en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFalk PM, Blatchford GJ, Cali RL, Christensen MA, Thorson AG. Transanal ultrasound and manometry in the evaluation of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 1994; 37: 468 – 72en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBurnett SJ, Speakman CT, Kamm MA, Bartram CI. Confirmation of endosonographic detection of external anal sphincter defects by simultaneous electromyographic mapping. Br J Surg 1991; 78: 448 – 50en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRociu E, Stoker J, Eijkemans MJ, Schouten WR, Lameris JS. Fecal incontinence: endoanal US versus endoanal MR imaging. Radiology 1999; 212: 453 – 8en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDeen KI, Kumar D, Williams JG, Olliff J, Keighley MR. Anal sphincter defects. Correlation between endoanal ultrasound and surgery. Ann Surg 1993; 218: 201 – 5en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMeyenberger C, Bertschinger P, Zala GF, Buchmann P. Anal sphincter defects in fecal incontinence: correlation between endosonography and surgery. Endoscopy 1996; 28: 217 – 24en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKleinubing H Jr, Jannini JF, Malafaia O, Brenner S, Pinho TM. Transperineal ultrasonography: a new method to image the anorectal region. Dis Colon Rectum 2000; 43: 1572 – 4en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDietz HP, Lanzarone V. Levator trauma after vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2005; 106: 707 – 12en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDietz HP, Shek C, Clarke B. Biometry of the pubovisceral muscle and levator hiatus by three-dimensional pelvic floor ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2005; 25: 580 – 5en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDobben AC, Wiersma TG, Janssen LW et al. Prospective assessment of interobserver agreement for defecography in fecal incontinence. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005; 185: 1166 – 72en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAzpiroz F, Enck P, Whitehead WE. Anorectal functional testing: review of collective experience. Am J Gastroenterol 2002; 97: 232 – 40en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRao SS, Azpiroz F, Diamante N, Enck P, Tougas G, Wald A. Minimum standards of anorectal monometry. Neurogasteroenterol Motil 2002; 14: 553 – 9en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChen AS, Luchtefeld MA, Senagore AJ, MacKeigan JM, Hoyt C. Pudendal nerve latency. Does it predict outcome of anal sphincter repair? Dis Colon Rectum 1998; 41: 1005 – 9en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCheetham M, Brazzelli M, Norton C, Glazener CM. Drug treatment for faecal incontinence in adults. Cochrane Database of Syst Rev 2003; 3: CD002116 10.1002/, 14651858.CD002116en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDonnelly V, O’Connell PR, O’Herlihy C. The influence of oestrogen replacement on faecal incontinence in postmenopausal women. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997; 104: 311 – 5en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBerghmans LC, Hendriks HJ, Bo K, Hay-Smith EJ, de Bie RA, van Waalwijk van Doorn ES. Conservative treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials. Br J Urol 1998; 82: 181 – 91en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNorton C, Hosker G, Brazzelli M. Biofeedback and/or sphincter exercises for the treatment of faecal incontinence in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000; 2: CD002111en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMartinez-Puente Mdel C, Pascual-Montero JA, Garcia-Olmo D. Customized biofeedback therapy improves results in fecal incontinence. Int J Colorectal Dis 2004; 19: 210 – 4en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDobben AC, Terra MP, Berghmans B et al. Functional changes after physiotherapy in fecal incontinence. Int J Colorectal Dis 2005 (Epub ahead of print) DOI: 10.1007/s00384-005-0049-6en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOzturk R, Niazi S, Stessman M, Rao SS. Long-term outcome and objective changes of anorectal function after biofeedback therapy for faecal incontinence. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2004; 20: 667 – 74en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNorton C, Chelvanayagam S, Wilson-Barnett J, Redfern S, Kamm MA. Randomized controlled trial of biofeedback for fecal incontinence. Gastroenterology 2003; 125: 1320 – 9en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSolomon MJ, Pager CK, Rex J, Roberts R, Manning J. Randomized, controlled trial of biofeedback with anal manometry, transanal ultrasound, or pelvic floor retraining with digital guidance alone in the treatment of mild to moderate fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 2003; 46: 703 – 10en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNorton C, Gibbs A, Kamm MA. Randomized, controlled trial of anal electrical stimulation for fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 2006; 49: 190 – 6en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFynes MM, Marshall K, Cassidy M et al. A prospective, randomized study comparing the effect of augmented biofeedback with sensory biofeedback alone on fecal incontinence after obstetric trauma. Dis Colon Rectum 1999; 42: 753 – 61en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMahony RT, Malone PA, Nalty J, Behan M, O’Connell PR, O’Herlihy C. Randomized clinical trial of intra-anal electromyographic biofeedback physiotherapy with intra-anal electromyographic biofeedback augmented with electrical stimulation of the anal sphincter in the early treatment of postpartum fecal incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 191: 885 – 90en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMatzel KE, Stadelmaier U, Hohenfellner M, Gall FP. Electrical stimulation of sacral spinal nerves for treatment of faecal incontinence. Lancet 1995; 346: 1124 – 7en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMatzel KE, Stadelmaier U, Hohenberger W. Innovations in fecal incontinence: sacral nerve stimulation. Dis Colon Rectum 2004; 47: 1720 – 8en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLeroi AM, Parc Y, Lehur PA et al. Efficacy of sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence: results of a multicenter double-blind crossover study. Ann Surg 2005; 242: 662 – 9en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJarrett ME, Varma JS, Duthie GS, Nicholls RJ, Kamm MA. Sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence in the UK. Br J Surg 2004; 91: 755 – 61en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKenefick NJ, Christiansen J. A review of sacral nerve stimulation for the treatment of faecal incontinence. Colorectal Dis 2004; 6: 75 – 80en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHosker G, Norton C, Brazzelli M. Electrical stimulation for faecal incontinence in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000; 2: CD001310en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePfrommer W, Holschneider AM, Loffler N, Schuff B, Ure BM. A new polyurethane anal plug in the treatment of incontinence after anal atresia repair. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2000; 10: 186 – 90en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDeutekom M, Dobben A. Plugs for containing faecal incontinence. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005; 3: CD005086. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005086.pub2en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceParks AG. Royal Society of Medicine, Section of Proctology; Meeting 27 November 1974. President’s Address. Anorectal incontinence. Proc R Soc Med 1975; 68: 681 – 90en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMalouf AJ, Norton CS, Engel AF, Nicholls RJ, Kamm MA. Long-term results of overlapping anterior anal-sphincter repair for obstetric trauma. Lancet 2000; 355: 260 – 5en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKaroui S, Leroi AM, Koning E, Menard JF, Michot F, Denis P. Results of sphincteroplasty in 86 patients with anal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 2000; 43: 813 – 20en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHalverson AL, Hull TL. Long-term outcome of overlapping anal sphincter repair. Dis Colon Rectum 2002; 45: 345 – 8en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBravo Gutierrez A, Madoff RD, Lowry AC, Parker SC, Buie WD, Baxter NN. Long-term results of anterior sphincteroplasty. Dis Colon Rectum 2004; 47: 727 – 31en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBarisic GI, Krivokapic ZV, Markovic VA, Popovic MA. Outcome of overlapping anal sphincter repair after 3 months and after a mean of 80 months. Int J Colorectal Dis 2006; 21: 52 – 6en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGarcia V, Rogers RG, Kim SS, Hall RJ, Kammerer-Doak DN. Primary repair of obstetric anal sphincter laceration: a randomized trial of two surgical techniques. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 192: 1697 – 701en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTjandra JJ, Han WR, Goh J, Carey M, Dwyer P. Direct repair vs. overlapping sphincter repair: a randomized, controlled trial. Dis Colon Rectum 2003; 46: 937 – 43en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTan M, O’Hanlon DM, Cassidy M, O’Connell PR. Advantages of a posterior fourchette incision in anal sphincter repair. Dis Colon Rectum 2001; 44: 1624 – 9en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKammerer-Doak DN, Wesol AB, Rogers RG, Dominquez CE, Dorin MH. A prospective cohort study of women after primary repair of obstetric anal sphincter laceration. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999; 181: 1317 – 23en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGrant A. The choice of suture materials and techniques for the repair of perineal trauma: an overview of the evidence from controlled trials. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1989; 96: 1281 – 9en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMackrodt C, Gordon B, Fern E, Ayers S, Truesdale A, Grant A. The Ipswich Childbirth Study: 2. A randomized comparison of polyglactin 910 with chromic catgut for postpartum perineal repair. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1998; 105: 441 – 5en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMahomed K, Grant A, Ashurst H, James D. The Southmead perineal suture study. A randomized comparison of suture materials and suturing techniques for repair of perineal trauma. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1989; 96: 1272 – 80en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGuenaga K, Matos D, Castro AA, Atallah AN, DM Wille-JØrgensen P. Mechanical bowel preparation for elective colorectal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005; 1: CD001544. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001544.pub2en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNessim A Wexner SD Agachan F et al. Is bowel confinement necessary after anorectal reconstructive surgery? A prospective, randomized, surgeon-blinded trial. Dis Colon Rectum 1999; 42: 16 – 23en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWilliams NS, Patel J, George BD, Hallan RI, Watkins ES. Development of an electrically stimulated neoanal sphincter. Lancet 1991; 338: 1166 – 9en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBaeten CG, Konsten J, Spaans F et al. Dynamic graciloplasty for treatment of faecal incontinence. Lancet 1991; 338: 1163 – 5en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBaeten CG, Bailey HR, Bakka A et al. Safety and efficacy of dynamic graciloplasty for fecal incontinence: report of a prospective, multicenter trial. Dynamic Graciloplasty Therapy Study Group. Dis Colon Rectum 2000; 43: 743 – 51en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKoch SM, Uludag O, Rongen MJ, Baeten CG, van Gemert W. Dynamic graciloplasty in patients born with an anorectal malformation. Dis Colon Rectum 2004; 47: 1711 – 9en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChristiansen J, Rasmussen OO, Lindorff-Larsen K. Long-term results of artificial anal sphincter implantation for severe anal incontinence. Ann Surg 1999; 230: 45 – 8en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDevesa JM, Rey A, Hervas PL et al. Artificial anal sphincter: complications and functional results of a large personal series. Dis Colon Rectum 2002; 45: 1154 – 63en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMundy L, Merlin TL, Maddern GJ, Hiller JE. Systematic review of safety and effectiveness of an artificial bowel sphincter for faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 2004; 91: 665 – 72en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShafik A. Polytetrafluoroethylene injection for the treatment of partial fecal incontinence. Int Surg 1993; 78: 159 – 61en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKenefick NJ, Vaizey CJ, Malouf AJ, Norton CS, Marshall M, Kamm MA. Injectable silicone biomaterial for faecal incontinence due to internal anal sphincter dysfunction. Gut 2002; 51: 225 – 8en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDavis K, Kumar D, Poloniecki J. Preliminary evaluation of an injectable anal sphincter bulking agent (Durasphere) in the management of faecal incontinence. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2003; 18: 237 – 43en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTjandra JJ, Lim JF, Hiscock R, Rajendra P. Injectable silicone biomaterial for fecal incontinence caused by internal anal sphincter dysfunction is effective. Dis Colon Rectum 2004; 47: 2138 – 46en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEfron JE. The SECCA procedure: a new therapy for treatment of fecal incontinence. Surg Technol Int 2004; 13: 107 – 10en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTakahashi T, Garcia-Osogobio S, Valdovinos MA, Belmonte C, Barreto C, Velasco L. Extended two-year results of radio-frequency energy delivery for the treatment of fecal incontinence (the Secca procedure). Dis Colon Rectum 2003; 46: 711 – 5en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNorton C, Burch J, Kamm MA. Patients’ views of a colostomy for fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 2005; 48: 1062 – 9en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
j.1464-410X.2006.06307.x.pdf
Size:
142.0KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.