Show simple item record

Life-Cycle Energy, Costs, and Strategies for Improving a Single-Family House

dc.contributor.authorKeoleian, Gregory A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBlanchard, Stevenen_US
dc.contributor.authorReppe, Peteren_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-01T22:43:07Z
dc.date.available2010-06-01T22:43:07Z
dc.date.issued2000-04en_US
dc.identifier.citationKeoleian, Gregory A.; Blanchard, Steven; Reppe, Peter (2000). "Life-Cycle Energy, Costs, and Strategies for Improving a Single-Family House." Journal of Industrial Ecology 4(2): 135-156. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/75688>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1088-1980en_US
dc.identifier.issn1530-9290en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/75688
dc.description.abstractThe life-cycle energy, greenhouse gas emissions, and costs of a contemporary 2,450 sq ft (228 m 3 ) U.S. residential home (the standard home, or SH) were evaluated to study opportunities for conserving energy throughout pre-use (materials production and construction), use (including maintenance and improvement), and demolition phases. Home construction and maintenance materials and appliances were inventoried totaling 306 metric tons. The use phase accounted for 91% of the total life-cycle energy consumption over a 50-year home life. A functionally equivalent energy-efficient house (EEH) was modeled that incorporated 11 energy efficiency strategies. These strategies led to a dramatic reduction in the EEH total life-cycle energy; 6,400 GJ for the EEH compared to 16,000 GJ for the SH. For energy-efficient homes, embodied energy of materials is important; pre-use energy accounted for 26% of life-cycle energy. The discounted (4%) life-cycle cost, consisting of mortgage, energy, maintenance, and improvement payments varied between 426,700 and 454,300 for a SH using four energy price forecast scenarios. In the case of the EEH, energy cost savings were offset by higher mortgage costs, resulting in total life-cycle cost between 434,100 and 443,200. Life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions were 1,010 metric tons CO 2 equivalent for an SH and 370 metric tons for an EEH.en_US
dc.format.extent877071 bytes
dc.format.extent3109 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherMIT Pressen_US
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltden_US
dc.rights2000 Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Yale Universityen_US
dc.subject.otherBuilding Materialsen_US
dc.subject.otherEco-efficiencyen_US
dc.subject.otherGreenhouse Gas Emissionsen_US
dc.subject.otherLife-cycle Cost Analysisen_US
dc.subject.otherLife-cycle Energy Analysisen_US
dc.subject.otherSingle-family Houseen_US
dc.titleLife-Cycle Energy, Costs, and Strategies for Improving a Single-Family Houseen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEcology and Evolutionary Biologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumCenter for Sustainable Systems, University of Michigan Ann Arbor, MI, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumCenter for Sustainable Systems University of Michigan Ann Arbor, MI, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherClean Air Campaign Colorado Springs, CO, USAen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/75688/1/108819800569726.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1162/108819800569726en_US
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Industrial Ecologyen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAdalberth, K. 2000. Energy use and environmental impact of new residential buildings. Doctoral dissertation, Lund University, Sweden.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAIA (American Institute of Architects). 1992. Environmental resource guide subscription. Washington, DC: AIA.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBlanchard, S. and P. Reppe 1998. Life cycle analysis of a residential home in Michigan. Master's thesis, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBoustead, I. and G. F. Hancock 1979. Handbook of Industrial Energy Analysis Chichester, UK: Ellis Horwood Publishers.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCole, R. J. 1993. Embodied Energy in Residential Building Construction. In Proceedings: Innovative Housing Conference, Vancouver, BC, June 21–25, 1: 49 – 59.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCole, R. J. 1999. Energy and greenhouse gas emissions associated with the construction of alternative structural systems. Building and Environment 34: 335 – 348.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceConstruction Review 1997. 42 ( 4 ).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCSS (Center for Sustainable Systems). 2000. Proceedings of the National Sustainable Buildings Workshop, 8–9 October, 1999, University of Michigan Comparative assessment of energy requirements for different types of residential buildings in India. Energy and Buildings 23: 141 – 146.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDeumling, R. 1999. The Industrial Ecology of Household Refrigerators: Product Life and the Demand for Materials and Energy. Energy and Resources Group, University of California, Berkeley.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEcobalance 1998. DEAM life-cycle inventory database. Ecobalance, Inc., Bethesda, MD.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceISO. 1997. Environmental management– Life cycle assessment–Principles and framework, ISO 14040. 1997-06-15, International Organization for Standards, Geneva.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJungbluth, N. 1997. Life cycle assessment for stoves and ovens. UNS working paper no. 16. Umweltnaturbund Umweltsozialwissenschaften, ZÜrich, Switzerland.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKeoleian, G. A., G. Lewis, R. B. Coulon, V. J. Camobreco, and H. P. Teulon 1998. LCI modeling challenges and solutions for a complex product system: A mid-sized automobile. In Total Life Cycle Conference Proceedings, P-339. SAE International, Warrendale, PA. Paper No. 982169: 71 – 84.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKiley, M. D. and M. Allyn 1997. 1997 national construction estimator, labor & material costs, manhours and city cost adjustments for all residential, commercial and industrial construction. Carlsbad, CA: Craftsman Book Company.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLewis, G. M., G. A. Keoleian, M. R. Moore, D. L. Mazmanian, and M. Navvab 1999. PV-BILD: A life cycle environmental and economic assessment tool for building-integrated photovoltaic installations. Project Report for National Science Foundation Lucent Technologies Industrial Ecology Grant BES-9727268. Center for Sustainable Systems, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNAHB. 1999. National Association of Home Builders. http://www.nahb.com.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNatural Cork, Ltd 1998. Personal communication. Augusta, GA, July.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePierquet, P., J. L. Bowyer, and P. Huelman 1998. Thermal performance and embodied energy of cold climate wall systems. Forest Products Journal 48 ( 6 ): 53 – 60.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePSIC (Passive Solar Industries Council) 1998. En-ergy-10, Release 1.2, January 1998, Washington, DC: PSIC.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRe-New Wood, Inc, 1999. Product literature for Ecoshake. Nagoner, OK: Re-New Wood.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceReppe, P. 1998a. Residential utility bill, Ann Arbor, MI.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceReppe, P. 1998b. Personal communication of utility costs based on July 1998 utility bills from the Reppe family residence in Langebruck, Germany.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSETAC (Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry). 1993. Workshop report–Guidelines for life-cycle assessment: A code of practice Pensacola, FL: SETAC.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSullivan, J. L. and J. Hu 1995. Life cycle energy analysis for automobiles. SAE Paper 951829.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceU.S. Census Bureau. 1998. Seasonality of Moves and Duration of Residence. In Current population reports: Household economic studies P70–66, October.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceU.S. Census Bureau. 1999. Estimates of housing units, households, households by age of householder, and persons per household: July 1, 1998. 98 – 46.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceU.S. Department of Commerce. 1995. 1992 Census of construction industries: Industry series general constructors–Single-family houses. CC92-I-1.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceU.S. DOE/EIA (U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration). 1995. Household energy consumption and expenditures 1993. DOE/EIA-0321 (93) Washington, DC: DOE/EIA, 10.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceU.S. DOE/EIA, Office of Integrated Analysis and Forecasting (U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration). 1997. Annual energy outlook 1998, with projections to 2020. DOE/ EIA-0383(98). Washington, DC: DOE/EIA, 78.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceU.S. DOE/EIA (U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration). 2000. Annual energy review 1999. DOE/EIA-0384(99), Washington, DC: DOE/EIA.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceU.S. EPA (U. S. Environmental Protection Agency). 1993. Life-cycle assessment: Inventory guidelines and principles. U.S. EPA, Risk Reduction Engineering Lab (EPA/600/R-92/245).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWilson, A. 1999. Small is beautiful: House size, resource use and the environment. Environmental Building News 8 ( 1 ).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWilson, A. and J. Morrill 1998. Consumer guide to home energy savings. 6th ed. Washington, DC: The American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.