Genetic continuity of brood-parasitic indigobird species
dc.contributor.author | Sefc, Kristina M. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Payne, Robert B. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Sorenson, Michael D. | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-06-01T22:43:26Z | |
dc.date.available | 2010-06-01T22:43:26Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2005-04 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | SEFC, KRISTINA M.; PAYNE, ROBERT B.; SORENSON, MICHAEL D. (2005). "Genetic continuity of brood-parasitic indigobird species." Molecular Ecology 14(5): 1407-1419. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/75693> | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0962-1083 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1365-294X | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/75693 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=15813780&dopt=citation | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Speciation in brood-parasitic indigobirds (genus Vidua ) is a consequence of behavioural imprinting in both males and females. Mimicry of host song by males and host fidelity in female egg laying result in reproductive isolation of indigobirds associated with a given host species. Colonization of new hosts and subsequent speciation require that females occasionally lay eggs in the nests of novel hosts but the same behaviour may lead to hybridization when females parasitize hosts already associated with other indigobird species. Thus, retained ancestral polymorphism and ongoing hybridization are two alternative explanations for the limited genetic differentiation among indigobird species. We tested for genetic continuity of indigobird species using mitochondrial sequences and nuclear microsatellite data. Within West Africa and southern Africa, allopatric populations of the same species are generally more similar to each other than to sympatric populations of different species. Likewise, a larger proportion of genetic variation is explained by differences between species than by differences between locations in alternative hierarchical amovas, suggesting that the rate of hybridization is not high enough to homogenize sympatric populations of different species or prevent genetic differentiation between species. Broad sharing of genetic polymorphisms among species, however, suggests that some indigobird species trace to multiple host colonization events in space and time, each contributing to the formation of a single interbreeding population bound together by songs acquired from the host species. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 410524 bytes | |
dc.format.extent | 3109 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.format.mimetype | text/plain | |
dc.publisher | Blackwell Science Ltd | en_US |
dc.rights | © 2005 Blackwell Publishing Ltd | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Ancestral Polymorphism | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Brood Parasitism | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Hybridization | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Mimicry | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Speciation | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Vidua | en_US |
dc.title | Genetic continuity of brood-parasitic indigobird species | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Ecology and Evolutionary Biology | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Science | en_US |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer Reviewed | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | † University of Michigan, Museum of Zoology & Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, 1109 Geddes Ave., Ann Arbor, MI 48109–1079, USA | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | * Boston University, Department of Biology, 5 Cummington Street, Boston MA 02215, USA, | en_US |
dc.identifier.pmid | 15813780 | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/75693/1/j.1365-294X.2005.02492.x.pdf | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02492.x | en_US |
dc.identifier.source | Molecular Ecology | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Balloux F, BrÜnner H, Lugon-Moulin N, Hausser J, Goudet J ( 2000 ) Microsatellites can be misleading: an empirical and simulation study. Evolution, 54, 1414 – 1422. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y ( 1995 ) Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), 57, 289 – 300. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Berlocher SH, Feder JL ( 2002 ) Sympatric speciation in phytophagous insects: moving beyond controversy? Annual Review of Entomology, 47, 773 – 815. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Bonnet E, Van de Peer Y ( 2002 ) zt: a software tool for simple and partial Mantel tests. Journal of Statistical Software, 7, 1 – 12. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Bush GL ( 1994 ) Sympatric speciation in animals: new wine in old bottles. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 9, 285 – 288. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Cooper A ( 1994 ) DNA from museum specimens. In: Ancient DNA: Recovery and Analysis of Genetic Material from Paleontological, Archaeological, Museum, Medical, and Forensic Specimens (eds Herrmann B, Herrmann S ), pp. 149 – 165. Springer-Verlag, New York. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Cornuet J-M, Luikart G ( 1996 ) Description and power analysis of two tests for detecting recent population bottlenecks from allele frequency data. Genetics, 144, 2001 – 2014. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Diegisser T, Johannesen J, Lehr C, Seitz A ( 2004 ) Genetic and morphological differentiation in Tephritis bardanae (Diptea: Tephritidae): evidence for host-race formation. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 17, 83 – 93. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Excoffier L, Smouse P, Quattro JM ( 1992 ) Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data. Genetics, 131, 479 – 491. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Felsenstein J ( 1989 ) phylip (Phylogeny Inference Package). Cladistics, 5, 164 – 166. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Goodman SJ ( 1997 ) rst calc: a collection of computer programs for calculating unbiased estimates of genetic differentiation and determining their significance for microsatellite data. Molecular Ecology, 6, 881 – 885. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Goudet J ( 2001 ) fstat version 2. 9. 3: a program to estimate and test gene diversities and fixation indices. Available from http://www.unil.ch/izea/softwares/fstat.html. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Hedrick PW ( 1999 ) Perspective: highly variable loci and their interpretation in evolution and conservation. Evolution, 53, 313 – 318. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Klein NK, Payne RB ( 1998 ) Evolutionary associations of brood-parasitic finches ( Vidua ) and their host species: analysis of mitochondrial DNA restriction sites. Evolution, 52, 566 – 582. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Legendre P, Vaudor A ( 1991 ) The r package: multidimensional analysis, spatial analysis. DÉpartement de Sciences Biologiques. UniversitÉ de MontrÉal, MontrÉal, Canada. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Nason JD, Heard SB, Williams FR ( 2002 ) Host-associated genetic differentiation in the goldenrod elliptical-gall moth, Gnorimoschema gallaesolidaginis (Lepidoptra: Gelechiidae). Evolution, 56, 1475 – 1488. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Nauta MJ, Weissing FJ ( 1996 ) Constraints on allele size at microsatellite loci: implications for genetic differentiation. Genetics, 143, 1021 – 1032. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Nicolai J ( 1964 ) Der brutparasitismus der viduinae als ethologisches problem. Zeitschrift fÜr Tierpsychologie, 21, 129 – 204. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Payne RB ( 1973 ) Behavior, mimetic songs and song dialects and relationships of the parasitic indigobirds ( Vidua ) of Africa. Ornithological Monographs, 11, 1 – 333. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Payne RB ( 1982 ) Species Limits in the Indigobirds (Ploceidae, Vidua ) of West Africa: Mouth Mimicry, Song Mimicry, and Description of New Species. Miscellaneous Publications of the University of Michigan Museum of Zoology, Ann Arbor. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Payne RB ( 1985 ) Behavioral continuity and change in local song populations of village indigobirds Vidua chalybeata. Zeitschrift fÜr Tierpsychologie, 70, 1 – 44. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Payne RB ( 2004 ) Viduidae, cuckoo-finch, whydahs and indigobirds. In: The Birds of Africa, vol. 7 (eds Fry CH, Keith S ), pp. 416 – 450. Christopher Helm, London. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Payne RB, Payne LL ( 1994 ) Song mimicry and species status of the indigobirds Vidua: associations with quail finch Ortygospiza atricollis, goldbreast Amandava subflava and brown twinspot Clytospiza monteiri. Ibis, 136, 291 – 304. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Payne RB, Payne LL ( 2002 ) Begging for parental care from another species: behavioural specialization and generalization in brood-parasitic finches. The Evolution of Begging: Competition, Cooperation and Communication (eds Wright J, Leonard ML ), pp. 429 – 450 Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, the Netherlands. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Payne RB, Sorenson MD ( 2004 ) Behavioral and genetic identification of a hybrid Vidua: maternal origin and mate choice in a brood-parasitic finch. Auk, 121, 156 – 161. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Payne RB, Payne LL, Woods JL ( 1998 ) Song learning in brood parasitic indigobirds Vidua chalybeata: song mimicry of the host species. Animal Behaviour, 55, 1537 – 1553. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Payne RB, Woods JL, Payne LL ( 2001 ) Parental care in estrildid finches: experimental tests of a model of Vidua brood parasitism. Animal Behaviour, 62, 473 – 483. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Payne RB, Barlow CR, Balakrishnan CN, Sorenson MD ( 2005 ) Song mimicry of black-bellied firefinch Lagonosticta rara and other finches by brood-parasitic indigobirds Vidua camerunensis. In: West Africa. Ibis, 147, 130 – 143. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Payne RB, Payne LL, Nhlane MED, Hustler K ( 1992 ) Species status and distribution of the parasitic indigo-birds Vidua in east and southern Africa. Proceedings of the VIII Pan-African Ornithological Congress, 40 – 52 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Payne RB, Payne LL, Woods JL, Sorenson MD ( 2000 ) Imprinting, sex and the origin of parasite–host species associations in female brood parasitic indigobirds Vidua chalybeata. Animal Behaviour, 59, 69 – 81. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Payne RB, Hustler K, Sternstedt R, Sefc KM, Sorenson MD ( 2002 ) Behavioural and genetic evidence of a recent population switch to a novel host species in brood parasitic indigobirds Vidua chalybeata. Ibis, 144, 373 – 383. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P ( 2000 ) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics, 155, 945 – 959. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Queller DC, Goodnight KF ( 1989 ) Estimating relatedness using genetic markers. Evolution, 43, 258 – 275. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Raymond M, Rousset F ( 1995 ) genepop (version 1.2): population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. Journal of Heredity, 86, 248–249. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Rosenberg NA, Nordborg M ( 2002 ) Genealogical trees, coalescent theory and the analysis of genetic polymorphisms. Nature Genetics Reviews, 3, 380 – 390. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Rozas J, SÁnchez-Delbarrio JC, Messeguer X, Rozas R ( 2003 ) dnasp, DNA polymorphism analyses by the coalescent and other methods. Bioinformatics, 19, 2496 – 2497. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Rundle HD, Nagel L, Wenrick Boughman J, Schluter D ( 2000 ) Natural selection and parallel speciation in sympatric sticklebacks. Science, 287, 306 – 308. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Schluter D, Nagel LM ( 1995 ) Parallel speciation by natural selection. American Naturalist, 146, 292 – 301. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Schneider S, Roessli D, Excoffier L ( 2000 ) arlequin 2. 000: a software for population genetics data analysis. Genetics and Biometry Laboratory, University of Geneva, Switzerland. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Sefc KM, Payne RB, Sorenson MD ( 2001 ) Characterization of microsatellite loci in village indigobirds Vidua chalybeata and cross-species amplification in estrildid and ploceid finches. Molecular Ecology Notes, 1, 252 – 254. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Sefc KM, Payne RB, Sorenson MD ( 2003 ) Microsatellite amplification from museum feather samples: the effects of fragment size and template concentration on genotyping errors. Auk, 120, 982 – 989. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Slatkin M ( 1995 ) A measure of population subdivision based on microsatellite allele frequencies. Genetics, 139, 457 – 462. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Slatkin M ( 1996 ) In defense of founder-flush theories of speciation. American Naturalist, 147, 493 – 505. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Sorenson MD, Balakrishnan CN, Payne RB ( 2004 ) Clade-limited colonization in brood parasitic finches ( Vidua spp.). Systematic Biology, 53, 140 – 153. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Sorenson MD, Payne RB ( 2001 ) A single, ancient origin of obligate brood parasitism in African finches: implications for host-parasite coevolution. Evolution, 55, 2550 – 2567. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Sorenson MD, Payne RB ( 2002 ) Molecular genetic perspectives on avian brood parasitism. Integrative and Comparative Biology, 142, 388 – 400. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Sorenson MD, Sefc KM, Payne RB ( 2003 ) Speciation by host switch in brood parasitic indigobirds. Nature, 424, 928 – 931. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Turner GF ( 2002 ) Parallel speciation, despeciation and respeciation: implications for species definition. Fish and Fisheries, 3, 225 – 229. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Via S ( 2001 ) Sympatric speciation in animals: the ugly duckling grows up. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 16, 381 – 390. | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Interdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.