Show simple item record

Canalization and developmental stability in the Brachyrrhine mouse

dc.contributor.authorWillmore, Katherine Elizabethen_US
dc.contributor.authorZelditch, Miriam Leahen_US
dc.contributor.authorYoung, Nathanen_US
dc.contributor.authorAh-Seng, Andrewen_US
dc.contributor.authorLozanoff, Scotten_US
dc.contributor.authorHallgrímsson, Benedikten_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-01T22:44:32Z
dc.date.available2010-06-01T22:44:32Z
dc.date.issued2006-03en_US
dc.identifier.citationWillmore, Katherine Elizabeth; Zelditch, Miriam Leah; Young, Nathan; Ah-Seng, Andrew; Lozanoff, Scott; HallgrÍmsson, Benedikt (2006). "Canalization and developmental stability in the Brachyrrhine mouse." Journal of Anatomy 208(3): 361-372. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/75710>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0021-8782en_US
dc.identifier.issn1469-7580en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/75710
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=16533318&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractThe semi-dominant Br mutation affects presphenoid growth, producing the facial retrognathism and globular neurocranial vault that characterize heterozygotes. We analysed the impact of this mutation on skull shape, comparing heterozygotes to wildtype mice, to determine if the effects are skull-wide or confined to the sphenoid region targeted by the mutation. In addition, we examined patterns of variability of shape for the skull as a whole and for three regions (basicranium, face and neurocranium). We found that the Br mice differed significantly from wildtype mice in skull shape in all three regions as well as in the shape of the skull as a whole. However, the significant increases in variance and fluctuating asymmetry were found only in the basicranium of mutant mice. These results suggest that the mutation has a significant effect on the underlying developmental architecture of the skull, which produces an increase in phenotypic variability that is localized to the anatomical region in which the mean phenotype is most dramatically affected. These results suggest that the same developmental mechanisms that produce the change in phenotypic mean also produce the change in variance.en_US
dc.format.extent285198 bytes
dc.format.extent3109 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltden_US
dc.rights© 2006 The Authors Journal compilation © 2006 Anatomical Society of Great Britain and Irelanden_US
dc.subject.otherEvolutionen_US
dc.subject.otherFluctuating Asymmetryen_US
dc.subject.otherMorphometricsen_US
dc.subject.otherMutationen_US
dc.subject.otherVariabilityen_US
dc.titleCanalization and developmental stability in the Brachyrrhine mouseen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMedicine (General)en_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumMuseum of Paleontology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Medical Sciences,en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Cell Biology and Anatomy, anden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherBachelor of Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canadaen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Anatomy and Reproductive Biology, University of Hawaii at Manoa, John A Burns School of Medicine, Honolulu, Hawaiien_US
dc.identifier.pmid16533318en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/75710/1/j.1469-7580.2006.00527.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1469-7580.2006.00527.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Anatomyen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceClarke GM, McKenzie JA ( 1987 ) Developmental stability of insecticide resistant phenotypes in blowfly; a result of canalizing selection. Nature 325, 345 – 346.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceClarke GM ( 1997 ) The genetic and molecular basis of developmental stability: the Lucilla story. Trends Ecol Evol 12, 89 – 91.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDunn RB, Fraser AS ( 1958 ) Selection for an invariant character- ‘vibrissae number’-in the house mouse. Nature 181, 1018 – 1019.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDunn RB, Fraser AS ( 1959 ) Selection for an invariant character, vibrissae number in the house mouse. Aust J Biol Sci 12, 506 – 523.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGibson G, van Helden S ( 1997 ) Is function of the Drosophila homeotic gene Ultrabithorax canalized? Genetics 147, 1155 – 1168.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHallgrÍmsson B, Willmore K, Dorval C, Cooper DM ( 2004a ) Craniofacial variability and modularity in macaques and mice. J Exp Zool Part B Mol Dev Evol 302, 207 – 225.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHallgrÍmsson B, Willmore K, Hall BK ( 2002 ) Canalization, developmental stability, and morphological integration in primate limbs. Am J Phys Anthropol Supplement 35: ( Yearbook ), 131 – 158.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHallgrimsson B, Dorval CJ, Zelditch ML, German RZ ( 2004b ) Craniofacial variability and morphological integration in mice susceptible to cleft lip and palate. J Anat 205, 501 – 517.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHallgrÍmsson B, Brown JJY, Ford-Hutchinson A, Sheets HD, Zelditch ML, Jirik FR ( 2006 ) The brachymorph mouse and the developmental–genetic basis for canalization and morphological integration. Evol Dev 8, 61 – 73.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceIndrasamy H, Woods RE, McKenzie JA, Batterham P ( 2000 ) Fluctuating asymmetry for specific bristle characters in Notch mutants of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetica 109, 151 – 159.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKasai K, Moro T, Kanazawa E, Iwasawa T ( 1995 ) Relationship between cranial base and maxillofacial morphology. Eur J Orthod 17, 403 – 410.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKlingenberg CP, Barluenga M, Meyer A ( 2002 ) Shape analysis of symmetric structures: quantifying variation among individuals and asymmetry. Evolution 56, 1909 – 1920.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKlingenberg CP, Mebus K, Auffray JC ( 2003 ) Developmental integration in a complex morphological structure: how distinct are the modules in the mouse mandible? Evol Dev 5, 522 – 531.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLieberman DE, Pearson OM, Mowbray KM ( 2000a ) Basicranial influence on overall cranial shape. J Hum Evol 38, 291 – 315.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLieberman DE, Ross CF, Ravosa MJ ( 2000b ) The primate cranial base: ontogeny, function, and integration. Am J Phys Anthropol Supplement 31: (Yearbook), 117 – 169.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLozanoff S ( 1993 ) Midfacial retrusion in adult brachyrrhine mice. Acta Anat (Basel) 147, 125 – 132.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLozanoff S, Jureczek S, Feng T, Padwal R ( 1994 ) Anterior cranial base morphology in mice with midfacial retrusion. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 31, 417 – 428.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLozanoff S, Johnston J, Ma W, Lie Saux CJ ( 2001 ) Immunohistochemical localization of Pax2 and associated proteins in the developing kidney of mice with renal hypoplasia. J Histochem Cytochem 49, 1081 – 1097.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMa W, Lozanoff S ( 1993 ) External craniofacial features, body size, and renal morphology in prenatal brachyrrhine mice. Teratology 47, 321 – 332.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMa W, Lozanoff S ( 1996 ) Morphological deficiency in the prenatal anterior cranial base of midfacially retrognathic mice. J Anat 188, 547 – 555.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMa W, Lozanoff S ( 1999 ) Spatial and temporal distribution of cellular proliferation in the cranial base of normal and midfacially retrusive mice. Clin Anat 12, 315 – 325.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMa W, Lozanoff S ( 2002 ) Differential in vitro response to epidermal growth factor by prenatal murine cranial-base chondrocytes. Arch Oral Biol 47, 155 – 163.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMarquez E ( 2004 ) Sage3D. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Museum of Zoology.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMather K ( 1953 ) Genetical control of stability in development. Nature 7, 297 – 336.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcBratney BM, Margaryan E, Ma W, Urban Z, Lozanoff S ( 2003 ) Frontonasal dysplasia in 3H1Br/Br mice. Anat Rec 271A, 291 – 302.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcKenzie JA, Clarke GM ( 1988 ) Diazinon resistance in the Australian sheep blowfly, Lucilia cuprina. Genetics 120, 213 – 220.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceO'Higgins P, Jones N ( 1998 ) Morphologika. London: University College.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOrkin RW, Pratt RM, Martin GR ( 1976 ) Undersulfated chondroitin sulfate in the cartilage matrix of brachymorph mice. Dev Biol 50, 82 – 94.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePalmer AR, Strobeck C ( 1986 ) Fluctuating asymmetry: measurement, analysis, patterns. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 17, 391 – 421.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePalmer R, Strobeck C ( 2003 ) Fluctuating Asymmetry Analysis Unplugged. In: Developmental Instability (DI): Causes and Consequences (ed. Polak M ), pp. 279 – 319. Oxford: Oxford University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRendel JM ( 1959 ) Canalization of the scute phenotype of Drosophila. Evolution 13, 425 – 439.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRendel JM ( 1967 ) Canalization and Gene Control. London: Logos Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRutherford SL, Lindquist S ( 1998 ) Hsp90 as a capacitor for morphological evolution. Nature 396, 336 – 342.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRutherford SL ( 2000 ) From genotype to phenotype: buffering mechanisms and the storage of genetic information. Bioessays 22, 1095 – 1105.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSakai K-I, Shimamoto Y ( 1965 ) Developmental instability in leaves and flowers of Nicotiana tabacum. Genet Res 6, 93 – 103.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceScharloo W ( 1991 ) Canalization: genetic and developmental aspects. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 22, 65 – 93.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchmalhausen II ( 1949 ) Factors of Evolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSearle A ( 1966 ) New mutants. Mouse Letter 35, 27.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSheets HD ( 2004a ) Simple3D. Buffalo: Canisius College.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSheets HD ( 2004b ) 3DStand. Buffalo: Canisius College.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSiegal ML, Bergman A ( 2002 ) Waddington's canalization revisited: developmental stability and evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99, 10528 – 10532.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSlice DE ( 1994–1999 ) Morpheus. Stony Brook, NY: State University of New York.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSperber GH ( 2001 ) Craniofacial Development. Hamilton: BC Decker Inc.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTanaka Y, Naruse I, Maekawa T, Masuya H, Shiroishi T, Ishii S ( 1997 ) Abnormal skeletal patterning in embryos lacking a single Cbp allele: a partial similarity with Rubinstein–Taybi syndrome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94, 10215 – 10220.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTrotta V, Garoia F, Guerra D, Pessoli MC, Grifoni D, Cavicchi S ( 2005 ) Developmental instability of the Drosophila wing as an index of genomic perturbation and altered cell proliferation. Evol Dev 7, 234 – 243.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVan Valen LM ( 1962 ) A study of fluctuating asymmetry. Evolution 16, 125 – 142.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWaddington CH ( 1942 ) The canalisation of development and the inheritance of acquired characters. Nature 150, 563.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWaddington CH ( 1957 ) Strategy of the Genes. New York: MacMillan.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWagner GP, Altenberg L ( 1996 ) Complex adaptations and the evolution of evolvability. Evolution 50, 967 – 976.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZelditch ML, Lundrigan BL, Sheets HD, Garland T ( 2003 ) Do precocial mammals development at a higher rate? A comparison of rates of skull development in Sigmodon fulviventer and Mus musculus domesticus. J Evol Biol 16, 708 – 720.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.