Show simple item record

Pollination and Predation Limit Fruit Set in a Shrub, Bourreria succulents (Boraginaceae), after Hurricanes on San Salvador Island, Bahamas 1

dc.contributor.authorRathcke, Beverly J.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-01T22:45:14Z
dc.date.available2010-06-01T22:45:14Z
dc.date.issued2001-06en_US
dc.identifier.citationRathcke, Beverly J. (2001). "Pollination and Predation Limit Fruit Set in a Shrub, Bourreria succulents (Boraginaceae), after Hurricanes on San Salvador Island, Bahamas 1 ." Biotropica 33(2): 330-338. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/75721>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0006-3606en_US
dc.identifier.issn1744-7429en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/75721
dc.description.abstractHurricanes have been assumed to reduce the reproduction of plants, either directly by leaf stripping and stress or indirectly by reducing pollinators. I examined the pollination and fruit set of a common shrub, Bourreria succulenta , after hurricanes on San Salvador island, Bahamas. Contrary to the assumption of resource limitation, B. succulenta showed unusually prolific flowering after Hurricane Lili stripped leaves from most of the plants in October 1996. I predicted that the abundant flowering would saturate pollinators and that fruit set would be pollination-limited. Fruit set was strongly pollination-limited by 71 percent. Butterflies are probably the major pollinators and were present at the site, but they rarely visited B. succulenta flowers even though flowers were brimming with nectar. Nectarivorous birds (Bananaquits and Bahama Wbodstars) visit B. succulenta flowers, but their populations were decimated by Hurricane Lili and they rarely visited flowers during this time. Fruit set was also severely predation-limited; a moth caterpillar (Gelechiidae) was extremely abundant and ate buds, flowers, and fruits, causing a further 68 percent reduction in fruit set. Together, pollination limitation and predation limitation reduced fruit set to only 7 percent or less. Predation was also intense in 1999 after Hurricane Floyd and resulted in 11 percent fruit set or less. Whether or not hurricanes were the cause of limited pollinators or abundant predators, the resulting low fruit set could have population effects because hurricanes can provide opportunities for the recruitment of new plants. These results emphasize that understanding plant–animal interactions may be necessary for predicting the effects of hurricanes on plant reproductive success, which may affect subsequent recruitment. Species on small islands like San Salvador (150 km 2 ) with relatively few species may be especially vulnerable to environmental disturbances such as hurricanes.en_US
dc.format.extent770184 bytes
dc.format.extent3109 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltden_US
dc.rights2001 The Association for Tropical Biology and Conservation Inc.en_US
dc.subject.otherKey Words: Bahamasen_US
dc.subject.otherBourreriaen_US
dc.subject.otherFlower Predationen_US
dc.subject.otherFruit Predationen_US
dc.subject.otherFruit Seten_US
dc.subject.otherHurricane Effectsen_US
dc.subject.otherIsland Pollinationen_US
dc.subject.otherPlant-animal Interactionsen_US
dc.subject.otherPollination Limitationen_US
dc.subject.otherScrublands.en_US
dc.titlePollination and Predation Limit Fruit Set in a Shrub, Bourreria succulents (Boraginaceae), after Hurricanes on San Salvador Island, Bahamas 1en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEcology and Evolutionary Biologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1048, U.S.A.en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/75721/1/j.1744-7429.2001.tb00184.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1744-7429.2001.tb00184.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceBiotropicaen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAckerman, J. D., and A. M. Montalvo. 1990. Short- and long-term limitations to fruit production in a tropical orchid. Ecology 71: 263 – 272.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAckerman, J. D. and S. Moya. 1996. Hurricane aftermath: resiliency of an orchid–pollinator interaction in Puerto Rico. Caribb. J. Sci. 32: 369 – 374.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAl-Shehbaz, I. A. 1991. The genera of Boraginaceae in the southeastern United States. J. Arnold Arb. (suppl. ser.) 1: 1 – 169.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAskins, R. A., and D. N. Ewert. 1991. Impact of Hurricane Hugo on bird populations on St. John, U.S. Virgin Islands. Biotropica 23: 481 – 487.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBahamas Department OF Meteorology. n.d. Hurricane Lili in the Bahamas, 18–19 October 1996. Bahamas Dept. of Meteorology, Nassau, Bahamas.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBahamas Department OF Meteorology. n.d. Hurricane Erin in the Bahamas, 30 July–2 August 1995. Bahamas Dept. of Meteorology, Nassau, Bahamas.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBaker, H. G., R. W. Cruden, and I. Baker. 1971. Minor parasitism in pollination biology and its community function: the case of Ceiba acuminata. BioScience 21: 1127 – 1129.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBarrett, S. C. H. 1996. The reproductive biology and genetics of island plants. N. Philosophic. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 351: 725 – 733.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBolten, A. B., P. Feinsinger, H. G. Baker, and I. Baker. 1979. On the calculation of sugar concentration in flower nectar. Oecologia 41: 301 – 304.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBoose, E. R., D. R. Foster, and M. Fluet. 1994. Hurricane impacts to tropical and temperate forest landscapes. Ecol. Monogr. 64: 369 – 400.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBoucher, D. H. 1990. Growing back after hurricanes. BioScience 40: 163 – 166.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBronstein, J. L., and M. Hossert-McKey. 1995. Hurricane Andrew and a Florida fig pollination mutualism: resilience of an obligate interaction. Biotropica 27: 373 – 381.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCampbell, D. G. 1978. The ephemeral islands: a natural history of the Bahamas. Macmillan, London, England.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCarlquist, S. 1974. Island biology. Columbia University Press, New York, New York.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceConnell, J. H. 1978. Diversity in tropical forests and coral reefs. Science 199: 1302 – 1310.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCorrell, D. S., and H. B. Correll. 1982. Flora of the Bahama archipelago. In J. Cramer ( Ed. ). A. R. Gantner Verlag Kommanditgeselleschaft, Vaduz, Leichtenstein.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEllioit, N. B. 1993. Field guide to the insects of San Salvador island, Bahamas, 2nd edition. Bahamian Field Station, San Salvador, Bahamas.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceD. Riley, and H. K. Clench. 1980. Annotated list of butterflies of San Salvador island, Bahamas. J. Lepid. Soc. 34: 120 – 126.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceElmqvist, T, P. A. Cox, W. E. Rainey, and E. D. Pierson. 1992. Restricted pollination on oceanic islands: pollination of Ceiba pentandra by flying foxes in Samoa. Biotropica 24: 15 – 23.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEshbaugh, W. H., and T. K. Wilson. 1996. On the need to conserve Bahamian floral diversity. In N. B. Elliott, D. C. Edwards, and P. J. Godfrey ( Eds. ). Proceedings of the 6th symposium on the natural history of the Bahamas, pp. 77 – 82. Bahamian Field Station, San Salvador, Bahamas.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFeinsinger, P. 1987. Approaches to nectarivore–plant interactions in the New World. Rev. Chilena Hist. Nat. 60: 285 – 319.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceL. A. Swarm, and J. A. Wolfe. 1985. Nectar-feeding birds on Trinidad and Tobago: comparison of diverse and depauperate guilds. Ecol. Monogr. 55: 1 – 28.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJ. A. Wolfe, and L. A. Swarm. 1982. Island ecology: reduced hummingbird diversity and the pollination biology of plants, Trinidad and Tobago, West Indies. Ecology 63: 494 – 506.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGrant, G. S., P. Craig, and P. Trail. 1997. Cyclone-induced shift in foraging behavior of flying foxes in American Samoa. Biotropica 29: 224 – 228.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHerrera, C. M. 1996. Floral traits and plant adaptation to insect pollinators: a devil's advocate approach. In D. G. Lloyd and S. C. H. Barrett ( Eds. ). Floral biology: studies in the floral evolution in animal-pollinated plants, pp. 65 – 87. Chapman and Hall, New York, New York.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceInoue, K. 1993. Evolution of mutualism in plant–pollinator interactions on islands. BioScience 18: 525 – 536.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJordan, P. B. 1986. Herbal medicine and home remedies. A potpourri in Bahamian culture. Nassau Guardian Press, Nassau, New Providence, Bahamas. 172 pp.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLoope, L. L., and D. Mueller-Dombois. 1989. Characteristics of invaded islands, with special reference to Hawaii. In J. A. Drake, H. A. Mooney, F. di Castri, R. H. Groves, F. J. Kruger, M. Rejmanek, and M. Williamson ( Eds. ). Biological invasions: a global perspective, pp. 257 – 280. SCOPE. John Wiley and Sons, New York, New York.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLynch, J. F. 1991. Effects of Hurricane Gilbert on birds in a dry tropical forest in the Yucatan peninsula. Biotropica 23: 488 – 496.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMiller, L. D., M. J. Simon, and D. J. Harvey. 1992. The butterflies (Insecta: Lepidoptera) of Crooked, Acklins, and Mayaguana Islands, Bahamas, with a discussion of the biogeographical affinities of the Southern Bahamas and description of a new subspecies by H. K. Clench. Annals of the Carnegie Museum 61: 1 – 31.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMurphy, M. T, K. L. Cornell, and K. L. Murphy. 1998. Winter bird communities on San Salvador, Bahamas. J. Field Ornithol. 69: 402 – 414.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOllerton, J. 1996. Reconciling ecological processes with phylogenetic patterns: the apparent paradox of plant-pollinator systems. J. Ecol. 84: 767 – 769.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePascarella, J. B. 1998a. Resiliency and response to hurricane disturbance in a tropical shrub, Ardisia escallonioides (Myrsinaceae), in south Florida. Am. J. Bot. 85: 1207 – 1215.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePascarella, J. B. 1998b. Hurricane disturbance, plant-animal interactions, and the reproductive success of a tropical shrub. Biotropica 30: 416 – 424.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRathcke, B. 1988. Interactions for pollination among coflowering shrubs. Ecology 69: 446 – 457.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRathcke, B. 1998. Bird pollination of the endemic Bahama swamp-bush, Pavonia bahamensis Hitchc. (Malvaceae): the risk of specialization. In T. K. Wilson ( Ed. ). Proceedings of the 7th symposium on the natural history of the Bahamas, pp. 105 – 110. Bahamian Field Station, San Salvador, Bahamas.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRathcke, B. 2000a. Hurricane causes resource and pollination limitation of fruit set in a bird-pollinated shrub. Ecology 81: 92 – 99.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRathcke, B. 2000b Birds, pollination reliability, and green flowers in an endemic island shrub, Pavonia bahamensis (Malvaceae). Rhodora 102: 392 – 414.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRathcke, B and E. S. Jules. 1993. Habitat fragmentation and plant–pollinator interactions. Curr. Sci. 65: 273 – 277.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRathcke, B., L. B. Kass, and R. E. Hunt. 1996. Preliminary observations on plant reproductive biology in mangrove communities on San Salvador island, Bahamas. In N. B. Elliott, D. C. Edwards, and P. J. Godfrey ( Eds. ). Proceedings of the 6th symposium on the natural history of the Bahamas, pp. 87 – 96. Bahamian Field Station, San Salvador, Bahamas.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRathcke, B. and N. B. Elliott. 2001. The floral biology and pollination of strongback, Bourreria succulenta (Boraginceae), on San Salvador island, Bahamas. In G. Smith and C. Clark ( Eds. ). Proceedings of the 8th symposium on the natural history of the Bahamas. Bahamian Field Station, San Salvador, Bahamas. In press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceReilly, A. E. 1991. The effects of Hurricane Hugo in three tropical forests in the U.S. Virgin Islands. Biotropica 23: 414 – 419.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRiley, N. D. 1975. A field guide to the butterflies of the West Indies. William Collins Sons, London, England.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchkmske, D. W. 1983. Limits to specialization and coevolution in plant–animal mutualisms. In M. H. Nitecki ( Ed. ). Coevolution, pp. 67 – 110. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchkmske, D. W and C. C. Horvitx. 1984. Variation among floral visitors in pollination ability: a precondition for mutualism specialization. Science 225: 519 – 521.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceScurlock, J. P. 1987. Native trees and shrubs of the Florida Keys. Laurel Press, Bethel Park, Pennsylvania.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShaklee, R. V. 1996. Weather and climate: San Salvador island, Bahamas. Bahamian Field Station, San Salvador, Bahamas.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSimberloff, D. 1995. Why do introduced species appear to devastate islands more than mainland areas ? Pac. Sci. 49: 87 – 97.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSmith, R. R. 1993. Field guide to the vegetation of San Salvador island, The Bahamas, 2nd edition. Bahamian Field Station, San Salvador, Bahamas.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSpears, E. E., Jr. 1987. Island and mainland pollination ecology of Centrosema Virginianum and Opuntia stricta. J Ecol. 75: 351 – 362.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVandermeer, J., D. Boucher, I. Perfecto, and I. Granzowdela Cerda. 1996. A theory of disturbance and species diversity: evidence from Nicaragua after Hurricane Joan. Biotropica 28: 600 – 613.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWaide, R. B. 1991. The effect of Hurricane Hugo on bird populations in the Luquillo Experimental Forest, Puerto Rico. Biotropica 23: 475 – 480.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWalker, L. R., J. Voltzow, J. D. Ackerman, D. S. Fernandez, and N. Fetcher. 1992. Immediate impact of Hurricane Hugo on a Puerto Rican rain forest. Ecology 73: 691 – 694.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWauer, R. H., and J. M. Wunderle, Jr.. 1992. The effect of Hurricane Hugo on bird populations on St. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands. Wilson Bull. 104: 656 – 669.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWhite, V. 1985. The outermost island: an oral history of San Salvador, The Bahamas. CCFL Bahamian Field Station, San Salvador, Bahamas.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWill, T. 1991. Birds of a severely hurricane-damaged Atlantic coastal rain forest in Nicaragua. Biotropica 23: 313 – 316.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWoodell, S. R. J. 1979. The role of unspecialized pollinators in the reproductive success of Aldabran plants. Philosophic Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. 286: 99 – 108.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWunderle, J. M. Jr. 1995. Responses of bird populations in a Puerto Rican forest to Hurricane Hugo: the first 18 months. Condor 97: 879 – 896.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceD. J. Lodge, and R. B. Waide. 1992. Short-term effects of Hurricane Gilbert on terrestrial bird populations on Jamaica. Auk 109: 148 – 166.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWunderlin, R. D. 1998. Guide to the vascular plants of Florida. University Press of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZimmerman, J. K., E. M. Everham III, R. B. Waide, D. J. Lodge, C. M. Taylor, and N. V. L. Brokaw. 1994. Responses of tree species to hurricane winds in subtropical wet forest in Puerto Rico: implications for tropical tree life histories. J. Ecol. 82: 911 – 922.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.