Show simple item record

Food Web Constraints on Chinook Salmon Recruitment in a Large Lake Michigan Tributary.

dc.contributor.authorKrueger, Damon M.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-03T15:35:44Z
dc.date.availableNO_RESTRICTIONen_US
dc.date.available2010-06-03T15:35:44Z
dc.date.issued2010en_US
dc.date.submitted2010en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/75804
dc.description.abstractNatural reproduction of Chinook salmon now supplies half of all recruits to the Lake Michigan sport fishery but may vary greatly due to environmental variability and biotic interactions in tributary nursery areas. From 2004 to 2007, I evaluated the relative effect of predation by stocked sport fish species on Chinook salmon recruitment variability in the Muskegon River, a large Lake Michigan tributary. Together, walleye and brown trout annually consumed from 17 to 47% of available Chinook salmon parr. Although brown trout consumed large quantities of Chinook parr, I found that hatchery trout dominated walleye diets. Walleye were size-selective for small hatchery trout but prey size was independent of predator size. In general, walleye showed neutral selection for prey species although they positively selected for rainbow trout and selected against Chinook parr in some years. Brown trout consumed smaller-than-average Chinook salmon parr although prey size was also independent of predator size. Chinook parr were positively selected as prey by brown trout but only in April when parr were < 40 mm in length. The presence of alternate prey significantly influenced walleye predation on Chinook salmon parr while brown trout appeared to be limited by Chinook size. I developed a functional response model using a Type-II curve for walleyes and a Type-I curve for brown trout to varying abundances of prey. Brown trout had the greatest impact on Chinook salmon recruitment based on their feeding behavior and consumption rates. Management efforts to reduce brown trout abundance via stocking could increase short-term survival of Chinook salmon parr by up to 31%. To assess long-term predation effects on Chinook recruitment from the Muskegon River, I used a stage-based matrix model (RAMAS Stage) parameterized with empirically-derived estimates of Chinook salmon growth, survival, abundance and fecundity. I simulated variable fry-to-smolt survival rates using 26 theoretical predator regimes and compared the results to baseline (i.e. observed) values. Only scenarios that involved removal of brown trout significantly increased long-term Chinook salmon recruitment. Based on the results of my dissertation research, I recommend elimination of brown trout stocking in all tributaries that produce Chinook salmon parr.en_US
dc.format.extent1425173 bytes
dc.format.extent1373 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectChinook Salmonen_US
dc.subjectFishery Managementen_US
dc.subjectRecruitment Variabilityen_US
dc.subjectGreat Lakesen_US
dc.subjectPredation Mortalityen_US
dc.subjectWalleye, Brown Trouten_US
dc.titleFood Web Constraints on Chinook Salmon Recruitment in a Large Lake Michigan Tributary.en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreenamePhDen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineNatural Resources and Environmenten_US
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studiesen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberDiana, James Stephenen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberRutherford, Edward S.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberGoldberg, Deborah E.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberMason, Doran M.en_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelNatural Resources and Environmenten_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/75804/1/damonkr_1.pdf
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.