Show simple item record

Evaluation of Three Types of Mental Health Treatment Outcome for Asian American Clients.

dc.contributor.authorTsuru, Garyn K.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-03T15:35:48Z
dc.date.availableNO_RESTRICTIONen_US
dc.date.available2010-06-03T15:35:48Z
dc.date.issued2010en_US
dc.date.submitteden_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/75805
dc.description.abstractThe present study examined several client demographic, clinical, and service provider variables and their relationship to treatment outcome as defined as premature termination in the first month of treatment, treatment length (total number of completed psychotherapy sessions), and change in pre/post-treatment Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) scores for 1,030 Asian Americans (193 Cambodian, 349 Chinese, 134 Iu Mien, 113 Korean, and 241 Vietnamese) seeking individual psychotherapy from an ethnic-specific mental health service provider. Results showed that more educated clients, who spoke English as their primary language, were client-therapist Asian language matched, or assigned their intake therapist as their primary therapist were less likely to prematurely terminate from treatment. Korean Americans also reported the highest rates of premature termination in this sample. To account for clients who discontinued treatment in the first month, subsequent analyses on treatment length and pre/post-treatment GAF scores were completed on a smaller sample of 937 Asian Americans (187 Cambodian, 318 Chinese, 127 Iu Mien, 91 Korean, and 214 Vietnamese). Results showed that clients who were women, Cambodian or Iu Mien American, completed more medication consultation appointments, or averaged more therapy sessions per week reported longer treatment lengths. In contrast, clients who were discharged or referred to other facilities by therapists or diagnosed with an adjustment disorder completed shorter treatment lengths. Results also showed that clients who completed more medication consultation appointments, were discharged or referred to other facilities by their therapists, had longer treatment lengths, or were diagnosed with an adjustment disorder reported a larger difference in pre/post-treatment GAF scores. In contrast, Cambodian Americans and clients who averaged more therapy sessions per week reported with smaller differences in pre/post-treatment GAF scores. In general, the results of this dissertation study suggest there may be culturally related factors unique to specific Asian American ethnic groups that may influence differential treatment outcome. Furthermore, the findings suggest the need for greater care and consideration in studying how ethnic-specific services are being delivered to various Asian American groups and underscores the importance of evaluating the treatment needs of Asian American groups separately rather than an aggregate whole.en_US
dc.format.extent2948532 bytes
dc.format.extent1373 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectAsian Americansen_US
dc.subjectService Utilizationen_US
dc.subjectMental Healthen_US
dc.subjectEthnic-Specific Servicesen_US
dc.subjectPremature Terminationen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of Three Types of Mental Health Treatment Outcome for Asian American Clients.en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreenamePhDen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplinePsychologyen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studiesen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberAkutsu, Phillip D.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberPeterson, Christopher M.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberMahalingam, Ramawasien_US
dc.contributor.committeememberSpencer, Michaelen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPsychologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/75805/1/gtsuru_1.pdf
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.