Nonresponse and Measurement Error in Mobile Phone Surveys.
dc.contributor.author | Kennedy, Courtney Kathryn | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-06-03T15:50:47Z | |
dc.date.available | NO_RESTRICTION | en_US |
dc.date.available | 2010-06-03T15:50:47Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2010 | en_US |
dc.date.submitted | en_US | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/75977 | |
dc.description.abstract | Landline telephone surveys have been used for several decades to generate critical knowledge about consumer confidence, health conditions, political attitudes, and other characteristics of the American public. The coverage provided by this methodology is rapidly declining due to widespread adoption and, in many cases, substitution of mobile (cell) phones over landlines. In order to address this problem, survey researchers have begun supplementing landline surveys with samples of cell phone numbers. The error properties of cell phone surveys, particularly with respect to nonresponse and measurement, are largely unknown. Researchers have limited knowledge as to why some people answer surveys on their cell phone but others do not. It is also an open question as to whether people respond less accurately on a cell phone as compared to a landline. The potential to interview people outside the home or engaged in an activity that distracts from the task of responding could result in respondents taking more cognitive shortcuts and providing less accurate data relative to landline interviews. These dynamics could also reduce the reliability of survey estimates and, for some measures, even change the mean of the response distribution. This dissertation uses data from a unique repeated-measures experiment to address these research gaps. Nonresponse modeling indicates that the sets of factors influencing participation decisions in landline and cell phone surveys are different, though overlapping. Measurement error comparisons show that the quality of data from cell phone and landline interviews are generally comparable, with some intriguing exceptions. Finally, there is evidence that respondents may answer some survey questions differently depending on whether they are interviewed at home or away from home, presumably because of differential environmental cues. This research demonstrates that the error properties of landline and cell phone survey data tend to be similar, but there are potentially important exceptions that warrant methodologists’ attention. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 21733 bytes | |
dc.format.extent | 1098377 bytes | |
dc.format.extent | 1373 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.format.mimetype | text/plain | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.subject | Cell Phone | en_US |
dc.subject | Survey Methodology | en_US |
dc.subject | Mobile Phone | en_US |
dc.subject | Telephone Survey | en_US |
dc.subject | Non-response | en_US |
dc.subject | Measurement Error | en_US |
dc.title | Nonresponse and Measurement Error in Mobile Phone Surveys. | en_US |
dc.type | Thesis | en_US |
dc.description.thesisdegreename | PhD | en_US |
dc.description.thesisdegreediscipline | Survey Methodology | en_US |
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantor | University of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studies | en_US |
dc.contributor.committeemember | Traugott, Michael W. | en_US |
dc.contributor.committeemember | Brick, J. Michael | en_US |
dc.contributor.committeemember | Conrad, Frederick G. | en_US |
dc.contributor.committeemember | Keeter, Scott | en_US |
dc.contributor.committeemember | Lepkowski, James M. | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Social Sciences (General) | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Social Sciences | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/75977/1/ckkenned_1.pdf | |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/75977/2/ckkenned_2.pdf | |
dc.owningcollname | Dissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's) |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.