The questionnaire for urinary incontinence diagnosis (QUID): Validity and responsiveness to change in women undergoing non-surgical therapies for treatment of stress predominant urinary incontinence
dc.contributor.author | Bradley, Catherine S. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Rahn, David D. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Nygaard, Ingrid E. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Barber, Matthew D. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Nager, Charles W. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Kenton, Kimberly S. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Siddiqui, Nazema Y. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Abel, Robert B. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Spino, Cathie | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Richter, Holly E. | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-07-06T14:29:22Z | |
dc.date.available | 2011-03-01T16:26:47Z | en_US |
dc.date.issued | 2010-06 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Bradley, Catherine S.; Rahn, David D.; Nygaard, Ingrid E.; Barber, Matthew D.; Nager, Charles W.; Kenton, Kimberly S.; Siddiqui, Nazema Y.; Abel, Robert B.; Spino, Cathie; Richter, Holly E. (2010). "The questionnaire for urinary incontinence diagnosis (QUID): Validity and responsiveness to change in women undergoing non-surgical therapies for treatment of stress predominant urinary incontinence." Neurourology and Urodynamics 29(5): 727-734. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/77446> | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0733-2467 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1520-6777 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/77446 | |
dc.description.abstract | Aims The Questionnaire for Urinary Incontinence Diagnosis (QUID), a 6-item urinary incontinence (UI) symptom questionnaire, was developed and validated to distinguish stress and urge UI. This study's objective was to evaluate QUID validity and responsiveness when used as a clinical trial outcome measure. Methods Participants enrolled in a multi-center trial of non-surgical therapy (continence pessary, pelvic floor muscle training or combined) for stress-predominant UI and completed baseline and 3-month diaries, the Urinary Distress Inventory (UDI) and QUID. Data from all treatment groups were pooled. QUID internal consistency (Cronbach's Α) and convergent/discriminant validity (Pearson correlations) were evaluated. Responsiveness to change was assessed with 3-month score outcomes and distribution-based measurements. Results Four hundred forty-four women (mean age 50) were enrolled with stress (N = 200) and mixed (N = 244) UI; 344 had 3-month data. Baseline QUID Stress and Urge scores (both scaled 0–15, larger values indicating worse UI) were 8.4 ± 3.2 and 4.5 ± 3.3, respectively. Internal consistency of QUID Total, Stress, and Urge scores was 0.75, 0.64 and 0.87, respectively. QUID Stress scores correlated moderately with UDI-Stress scores (r = 0.68, P < 0.0001) and diary stress UI episodes (r = 0.41, P < 0.0001). QUID Urge scores correlated moderately with UDI-Irritative scores (r = 0.68, P < 0.0001) and diary urge UI episodes (r = 0.45, P < 0.0001). Three-month QUID Stress and Urge scores improved (4.1 ± 3.4 and 2.2 ± 2.7, both P < 0.0001). QUID Stress score effect size (1.3) and standardized response mean (1.2) suggested a large change after therapy. Conclusion The QUID has acceptable psychometric characteristics and may be used as a UI outcome measure in clinical trials. Neurourol. Urodynam. 29:727–734, 2010. © 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 144334 bytes | |
dc.format.extent | 3118 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.format.mimetype | text/plain | |
dc.publisher | Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Life and Medical Sciences | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Miscellaneous Medical | en_US |
dc.title | The questionnaire for urinary incontinence diagnosis (QUID): Validity and responsiveness to change in women undergoing non-surgical therapies for treatment of stress predominant urinary incontinence | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.rights.robots | IndexNoFollow | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Internal Medicine and Specialties | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Health Sciences | en_US |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer Reviewed | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa ; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics, 200 Hawkins Drive, Iowa City, IA 52242. | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Women's Health Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | Departments of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Urology, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, Illinois | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama | en_US |
dc.identifier.pmid | 19787711 | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/77446/1/20818_ftp.pdf | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1002/nau.20818 | en_US |
dc.identifier.source | Neurourology and Urodynamics | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Interdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.