Show simple item record

The questionnaire for urinary incontinence diagnosis (QUID): Validity and responsiveness to change in women undergoing non-surgical therapies for treatment of stress predominant urinary incontinence

dc.contributor.authorBradley, Catherine S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorRahn, David D.en_US
dc.contributor.authorNygaard, Ingrid E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBarber, Matthew D.en_US
dc.contributor.authorNager, Charles W.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKenton, Kimberly S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSiddiqui, Nazema Y.en_US
dc.contributor.authorAbel, Robert B.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSpino, Cathieen_US
dc.contributor.authorRichter, Holly E.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-07-06T14:29:22Z
dc.date.available2011-03-01T16:26:47Zen_US
dc.date.issued2010-06en_US
dc.identifier.citationBradley, Catherine S.; Rahn, David D.; Nygaard, Ingrid E.; Barber, Matthew D.; Nager, Charles W.; Kenton, Kimberly S.; Siddiqui, Nazema Y.; Abel, Robert B.; Spino, Cathie; Richter, Holly E. (2010). "The questionnaire for urinary incontinence diagnosis (QUID): Validity and responsiveness to change in women undergoing non-surgical therapies for treatment of stress predominant urinary incontinence." Neurourology and Urodynamics 29(5): 727-734. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/77446>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0733-2467en_US
dc.identifier.issn1520-6777en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/77446
dc.description.abstractAims The Questionnaire for Urinary Incontinence Diagnosis (QUID), a 6-item urinary incontinence (UI) symptom questionnaire, was developed and validated to distinguish stress and urge UI. This study's objective was to evaluate QUID validity and responsiveness when used as a clinical trial outcome measure. Methods Participants enrolled in a multi-center trial of non-surgical therapy (continence pessary, pelvic floor muscle training or combined) for stress-predominant UI and completed baseline and 3-month diaries, the Urinary Distress Inventory (UDI) and QUID. Data from all treatment groups were pooled. QUID internal consistency (Cronbach's Α) and convergent/discriminant validity (Pearson correlations) were evaluated. Responsiveness to change was assessed with 3-month score outcomes and distribution-based measurements. Results Four hundred forty-four women (mean age 50) were enrolled with stress (N = 200) and mixed (N = 244) UI; 344 had 3-month data. Baseline QUID Stress and Urge scores (both scaled 0–15, larger values indicating worse UI) were 8.4 ± 3.2 and 4.5 ± 3.3, respectively. Internal consistency of QUID Total, Stress, and Urge scores was 0.75, 0.64 and 0.87, respectively. QUID Stress scores correlated moderately with UDI-Stress scores (r = 0.68, P  < 0.0001) and diary stress UI episodes (r = 0.41, P  < 0.0001). QUID Urge scores correlated moderately with UDI-Irritative scores (r = 0.68, P  < 0.0001) and diary urge UI episodes (r = 0.45, P  < 0.0001). Three-month QUID Stress and Urge scores improved (4.1 ± 3.4 and 2.2 ± 2.7, both P  < 0.0001). QUID Stress score effect size (1.3) and standardized response mean (1.2) suggested a large change after therapy. Conclusion The QUID has acceptable psychometric characteristics and may be used as a UI outcome measure in clinical trials. Neurourol. Urodynam. 29:727–734, 2010. © 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.en_US
dc.format.extent144334 bytes
dc.format.extent3118 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherWiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Companyen_US
dc.subject.otherLife and Medical Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.otherMiscellaneous Medicalen_US
dc.titleThe questionnaire for urinary incontinence diagnosis (QUID): Validity and responsiveness to change in women undergoing non-surgical therapies for treatment of stress predominant urinary incontinenceen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelInternal Medicine and Specialtiesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa ; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics, 200 Hawkins Drive, Iowa City, IA 52242.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texasen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utahen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherObstetrics, Gynecology, and Women's Health Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohioen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, Californiaen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartments of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Urology, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, Illinoisen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolinaen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabamaen_US
dc.identifier.pmid19787711en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/77446/1/20818_ftp.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/nau.20818en_US
dc.identifier.sourceNeurourology and Urodynamicsen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.