Show simple item record

Building Curriculum for Teacher Education: A Study of Video Records of Practice.

dc.contributor.authorBacevich, Amy E.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-08-27T15:13:13Z
dc.date.availableNO_RESTRICTIONen_US
dc.date.available2010-08-27T15:13:13Z
dc.date.issued2010en_US
dc.date.submitted2010en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/77781
dc.description.abstractResearch has long recognized the value of video technology in supporting preservice teachers’ learning, and recent technological and conceptual advances further demonstrate its potential as an everyday tool for teacher education. This dissertation examines video’s role in efforts to develop a “practice-based” curriculum for teacher education. Within a practice-focused theoretical framework (Reckwitz, 2002), this case study addresses features of the enacted curriculum that emerged as preservice teachers regularly shared and discussed videos of their teaching. The primary research question is: What curriculum for teacher education can develop over time through instructional use of video records of preservice teachers’ practice? Data were collected in a master’s level secondary teacher education program in which preservice teachers used video technology to record their teaching throughout the student teaching semester. The data included recordings of 16 discussions in which preservice teachers discussed their teaching videos with their peers, recordings of teacher educators’ planning meetings, and documents related to the teacher education program and course. Through an activity theory lens, I examined the loose structure provided by the teacher educators’ instructional model for video discussions and the ways participants developed this model within discussions. Through verbal analysis methods (Chi, 1997), I identified the discourse moves enacted by participants, the categories of content addressed, and the degree of alignment with the theoretical conception of teaching as a practice. The findings reveal a curriculum that emphasized the teacher’s authority to act in ways that influence her students’ classroom experiences—particularly their participation and engagement—while accounting for the nuances of particular teaching contexts. The enacted curriculum was characterized by preservice teachers’ collective engagement in clinical reasoning and the interplay of evidence from both the video and their experiences, within an instructional setting characterized by a “culture of nice.” The findings illustrate the promise and challenge of using videos of preservice teachers’ teaching as a practice-based approach to teacher education; the dissertation addresses implications at the teacher education program level and for the larger project of developing curriculum for practice-based teacher education.en_US
dc.format.extent5323318 bytes
dc.format.extent1373 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectVideo Study in Preservice Teacher Educationen_US
dc.subjectPractice-based Curriculum for Teacher Educationen_US
dc.titleBuilding Curriculum for Teacher Education: A Study of Video Records of Practice.en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreenamePhDen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineEducationen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studiesen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberLampert, Magdaleneen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberFishman, Barry Jayen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberFreeman, Donalden_US
dc.contributor.committeememberTeasley, Stephanieen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEducationen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/77781/1/abace_1.pdf
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.