Show simple item record

Islam and the Millennium: Sacred Kingship and Popular Imagination in Early Modern India and Iran.

dc.contributor.authorMoin, Ahmed Azfaren_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-08-27T15:14:44Z
dc.date.availableNO_RESTRICTIONen_US
dc.date.available2010-08-27T15:14:44Z
dc.date.issued2010en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/77799
dc.description.abstractThis dissertation focuses on the institution of sacred kingship in the Timurid, Safavid, and Mughal empires of the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries. It examines how a particular style of sovereignty came to be practiced by Muslim dynasts in early modern India and Iran. This was a style that can aptly be described as “saintly” and “messianic.” In a widespread phenomenon, Muslim monarchs came to embody their sacrality in the manner of Sufi saints and holy saviors. The messianic nature of sovereigns was evidenced by miraculous lore and astrological calculations, embodied in inventive court rituals and dress, visualized in new forms of art, and institutionalized in cults of devotion and submission to the monarch as both spiritual guide and material lord. In order to account for this historical development, this study emphasizes the performative aspect of Muslim kingship. Using methods of cultural history and anthropology, it argues that the social personality of Muslim sovereigns developed in a dialectic with the collective ideals and imagination of their diverse subject populations. Rulers drew inspiration less from scriptural sources of Islam than from broader processes of social memory, devotional practice, and popular myth. Notions of sovereignty were shaped by the master symbols and narratives of a shrine-centered Sufism, organized around the hereditary cult of the saint, which had come to dominate the religious and social life of this milieu. Thus, claims of political power became inseparable from claims of saintly status, giving rise to a long enduring pattern of messianic kingship. In short, this study challenges the dominant narrative of the rise of Muslim empires in this period, and questions the legalism and doctrinal basis of Islamic institutions of rule. Instead, in a revisionist vein, it reveals the symbolic and corporeal practices of sacred kingship and shows its adaptability to the diverse social and religious contexts across early modern India and Iran.en_US
dc.format.extent9373275 bytes
dc.format.extent1373 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectMughal Empireen_US
dc.subjectSafavid Empireen_US
dc.subjectTimurid Dynastyen_US
dc.subjectSufismen_US
dc.subjectSaintsen_US
dc.subjectMillenarianismen_US
dc.titleIslam and the Millennium: Sacred Kingship and Popular Imagination in Early Modern India and Iran.en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreenamePhDen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineHistoryen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studiesen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberMetcalf, Barbara Dalyen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberBabayan, Kathrynen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberCole, Juan R.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberJohnson, Paul Christopheren_US
dc.contributor.committeememberTrautmann, Thomas R.en_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelHistory (General)en_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMiddle Eastern, Near Eastern and North African Studiesen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelReligious Studiesen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelSouth Asian Languages and Culturesen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelAnthropology and Archaeologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelSocial Sciences (General)en_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHumanitiesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/77799/1/azfar_1.pdf
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.