Show simple item record

Predictors of alternative antidepressant agent initiation among U. S. veterans diagnosed with depression

dc.contributor.authorKim, Hyungjin Myraen_US
dc.contributor.authorZivin, Karaen_US
dc.contributor.authorGanoczy, Daraen_US
dc.contributor.authorPfeiffer, Paul N.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHoggatt, Katherineen_US
dc.contributor.authorMcCarthy, John F.en_US
dc.contributor.authorDowning, Karen E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorValenstein, Marciaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-10-06T14:57:06Z
dc.date.available2011-03-01T16:26:44Zen_US
dc.date.issued2010-10en_US
dc.identifier.citationKim, Hyungjin Myra; Zivin, Kara; Ganoczy, Dara; Pfeiffer, Paul; Hoggatt, Katherine; McCarthy, John F.; Downing, Karen; Valenstein, Marcia (2010). "Predictors of alternative antidepressant agent initiation among U. S. veterans diagnosed with depression." Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety 19(10): 1049-1056. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/78075>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1053-8569en_US
dc.identifier.issn1099-1557en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/78075
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVES Naturalistic studies comparing differences in risks across antidepressant agents must take into account factors which influence selection of specific agents and may be associated with outcomes. We examined predictors of antidepressant choice among VA patients treated for depression. METHODS Retrospective cohort study of VA patients with depression diagnoses and a new start of one of the seven most commonly prescribed antidepressant agents between 1 April 1999 and 30 September 2004 ( n  = 502 179). We examined the relationship between patient and facility characteristics and new starts of bupropion, citalopram, fluoxetine, mirtazapine, paroxetine, sertraline, and venlafaxine. We also examined factors associated with new starts only among patients starting selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). RESULTS Thirty-three percent of patients starting mirtazapine had at least three outpatient mental health visits in the prior year, compared to ≤24% of patients prescribed other antidepressants. Patients starting mirtazapine were also most likely to have received at least two other psychotropic medications in the prior year. Of the four SSRIs, 40% of the patients receiving sertraline and only 31% of those receiving fluoxetine were 65 years or older. A comorbid anxiety disorder (other than post-traumatic stress disorder) was diagnosed in 21% of paroxetine patients compared with ≤15% of other SSRI patients. CONCLUSION Choice of antidepressant medication for depressed VA patients was associated with important differences in demographic and clinical variables, including psychiatric illness severity, older age, and likelihood of a comorbid anxiety disorder. These findings emphasize the importance of controlling for selection bias when using observational data to compare risks from or effect of mental health treatments. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.en_US
dc.format.extent92686 bytes
dc.format.extent3118 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons, Ltd.en_US
dc.subject.otherLife and Medical Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.otherEpidemiology, Biostatistics and Public Healthen_US
dc.titlePredictors of alternative antidepressant agent initiation among U. S. veterans diagnosed with depressionen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelBiological Chemistryen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelChemistryen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Veterans Affairs, Ann Arbor Center of Excellence (COE), Serious Mental Illness Treatment Resource and Evaluation Center (SMITREC), Ann Arbor, Michigan ; Center for Statistical Consultation and Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan ; 3555 Rackham, CSCAR, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1070.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Veterans Affairs, Ann Arbor Center of Excellence (COE), Serious Mental Illness Treatment Resource and Evaluation Center (SMITREC), Ann Arbor, Michigan ; Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Veterans Affairs, Ann Arbor Center of Excellence (COE), Serious Mental Illness Treatment Resource and Evaluation Center (SMITREC), Ann Arbor, Michigan ; Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Veterans Affairs, Ann Arbor Center of Excellence (COE), Serious Mental Illness Treatment Resource and Evaluation Center (SMITREC), Ann Arbor, Michigan ; Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Veterans Affairs, Ann Arbor Center of Excellence (COE), Serious Mental Illness Treatment Resource and Evaluation Center (SMITREC), Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Veterans Affairs, Ann Arbor Center of Excellence (COE), Serious Mental Illness Treatment Resource and Evaluation Center (SMITREC), Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.identifier.pmid20629192en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/78075/1/1985_ftp.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/pds.1985en_US
dc.identifier.sourcePharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safetyen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.