Show simple item record

Delphi-Derived Development of a Common Core for Measuring Complementary and Alternative Medicine Prevalence

dc.contributor.authorLachance, Laurie L.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHawthorne, Victor M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBrien, Sarahen_US
dc.contributor.authorHyland, Michael E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLewith, George T.en_US
dc.contributor.authorVerhoef, Marja J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWarber, Sara L.en_US
dc.contributor.authorZick, Suzanna M.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-10-14T14:18:16Z
dc.date.available2010-10-14T14:18:16Z
dc.date.issued2009-05en_US
dc.identifier.citationLachance, Laurie L.; Hawthorne, Victor; Brien, Sarah; Hyland, Michael E.; Lewith, George T.; Verhoef, Marja J.; Warber, Sara; Zick, Suzanna (2009/05). "Delphi-Derived Development of a Common Core for Measuring Complementary and Alternative Medicine Prevalence." The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 15(5): 489-494 <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/78118>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1075-5535en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/78118
dc.description.abstractAbstract Assessing complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use remains difficult due to many problems, not the least of which is defining therapies and modalities that should be considered as CAM. Members of the International Society for Complementary Medicine Research (ISCMR) participated in a Delphi process to identify a core listing of common CAM therapies presently in use in Western countries. Lists of practitioner-based and self-administered CAM were constructed based on previous population-based surveys and ranked by ISCMR researchers by perceived level of importance. A total of 64 (49%) ISCMR members responded to the first round of the Delphi process, and 39 of these (61%) responded during the second round. There was agreement across all geographic regions (United States, United Kingdom, Canada, and Western Europe) for the inclusion of herbal medicine, acupuncture, homeopathy, Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM), chiropractic, naturopathy, osteopathy, Ayurvedic medicine, and massage therapy in the core practitioner-based CAM list, and for homeopathy products, herbal supplements, TCM products, naturopathic products, and nutritional products in the self-administered list. This Delphi process, along with the existing literature, has demonstrated that (1) separate lists are required to measure practitioner-based and self-administered CAM; (2) timeframes should include both ever use and recent use; (3) researchers should measure and report prevalence estimates for each individual therapy so that direct comparisons can be made across studies, time, and populations; (4) the list of CAM therapies should include a core list and additionally those therapies appropriate to the geographic region, population, and the specific research questions addressed, and (5) intended populations and samples studied should be defined by the researcher so that the generalizability of findings can be assessed. Ultimately, it is important to find out what CAM modality people are using and if they are being helped by these interventions.en_US
dc.format.extent148123 bytes
dc.format.extent3100 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherMary Ann Liebert, Inc.en_US
dc.titleDelphi-Derived Development of a Common Core for Measuring Complementary and Alternative Medicine Prevalenceen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.pmid19422299en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/78118/1/acm.2008.0430.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1089/acm.2008.0430en_US
dc.identifier.sourceThe Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicineen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.