Show simple item record

The relationship between neighborhood poverty and alcohol use: estimation by marginal structural models.

dc.contributor.authorCerda, M
dc.contributor.authorDiez Roux, Ana V.
dc.contributor.authorTohetgen, ET
dc.contributor.authorGordon-Larsen, P
dc.contributor.authorKiefe, C. I.
dc.date.accessioned2010-11-29T16:17:48Z
dc.date.available2010-11-29T16:17:48Z
dc.date.issued2010-07
dc.identifier.citationEpidemiology. 2010 Jul;21(4):482-9. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/78334>en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/78334
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Previous studies on the relationship of neighborhood disadvantage with alcohol use or misuse have often controlled for individual characteristics on the causal pathway, such as income-thus potentially underestimating the relationship between disadvantage and alcohol consumption. METHODS: We used data from the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults study of 5115 adults aged 18-30 years at baseline and interviewed 7 times between 1985 and 2006. We estimated marginal structural models using inverse probability-of-treatment and censoring weights to assess the association between point-in-time/cumulative exposure to neighborhood poverty (proportion of census tract residents living in poverty) and alcohol use/binging, after accounting for time-dependent confounders including income, education, and occupation. RESULTS: The log-normal model was used to estimate treatment weights while accounting for highly-skewed continuous neighborhood poverty data. In the weighted model, a one-unit increase in neighborhood poverty at the prior examination was associated with a 86% increase in the odds of binging (OR = 1.86 [95% confidence interval = 1.14-3.03]); the estimate from a standard generalized-estimating-equations model controlling for baseline and time-varying covariates was 1.47 (0.96-2.25). The inverse probability-of-treatment and censoring weighted estimate of the relative increase in the number of weekly drinks in the past year associated with cumulative neighborhood poverty was 1.53 (1.02-2.27); the estimate from a standard model was 1.16 (0.83-1.62). CONCLUSIONS: Cumulative and point-in-time measures of neighborhood poverty are important predictors of alcohol consumption. Estimators that more closely approximate a causal effect of neighborhood poverty on alcohol provided a stronger estimate than estimators from traditional regression models.en_US
dc.format.extent306566 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.titleThe relationship between neighborhood poverty and alcohol use: estimation by marginal structural models.en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPublic Health
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.contributor.affiliationumEpidemiology, Department ofen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/78334/1/CerdaDiezRoux2010_Epidemiology.pdf
dc.owningcollnameEpidemiology, Department of (SPH)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.