Examining phenolic induction in Fraxinus americana in response to herbivory.
dc.contributor.author | Boos, Bryana | |
dc.contributor.author | Kerch, Bradley | |
dc.contributor.author | Poisson, Autumn | |
dc.contributor.author | Reid, Caitlin | |
dc.coverage.spatial | UMBS Campus | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-12-08T14:30:34Z | |
dc.date.available | 2010-12-08T14:30:34Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2010 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/78384 | |
dc.description | General Ecology | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Many plants contain chemical defenses known as secondary compounds; one of the most prevalent classes is known as phenolics. Certain plants have been known to induce phenolics in response to damage, while others maintain constant levels of phenolics even after damage. In order to determine if phenolic induction occurs in white ash trees (Fraxinus americana) in response to herbivory, leaflets were sampled to test for local induction (at the site of herbivory) and systemic induction (induction throughout the plant). Induction as a response to mechanical damage (e.g. slicing) was measured in order to remove a potential noisy variable from the results. Leaflets for the local/systemic test were eaten by forest tent caterpillars (Malacosoma disstria) and samples of induced leaflets were collected 24 hours after herbivory. The Folin-Denis analysis was used to determine the magnitude of change in phenolics between the constitutive and induced levels. Local induction was not found, but systemic induction was found to occur evenly between leaflets, despite predictions that there would be a spatial differences. One potential explanation for this was volatile gaseous compounds sending airborne cues to the undamaged leaflets, causing induction. Slicing was not found to cause significant levels of induction. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 469650 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.relation.haspart | Graph | en_US |
dc.relation.haspart | Photograph | en_US |
dc.relation.haspart | Table of Numbers | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Herbivory | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Chemical | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Defense | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Induction | en_US |
dc.title | Examining phenolic induction in Fraxinus americana in response to herbivory. | en_US |
dc.type | Working Paper | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Natural Resources and Environment | |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Science | |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | Biological Station, University of Michigan (UMBS) | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampus | Ann Arbor | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/78384/1/Boos_Kerch_Poisson_Reid_2010.pdf | |
dc.owningcollname | Biological Station, University of Michigan (UMBS) |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe its collections in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in them. We encourage you to Contact Us anonymously if you encounter harmful or problematic language in catalog records or finding aids. More information about our policies and practices is available at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.