Show simple item record

Database Comparison of the Adult-to-Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation Cohort Study (A2ALL) and the SRTR U.S. Transplant Registry † , ‡

dc.contributor.authorGillespie, Brenda W.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMerion, Robert M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorOrtiz-Rios, E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorTong, Lanen_US
dc.contributor.authorShaked, Abrahamen_US
dc.contributor.authorBrown, R. S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorOjo, Akinlolu O.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHayashi, Paul H.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBerg, Carl L.en_US
dc.contributor.authorAbecassis, MIchael M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorAshworth, A. S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorFriese, C. E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHong, J. C.en_US
dc.contributor.authorTrotter, James F.en_US
dc.contributor.authorEverhart, James E.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-01-13T19:37:04Z
dc.date.available2011-01-13T19:37:04Z
dc.date.issued2010-07en_US
dc.identifier.citationGillespie, B. W.; Merion, R. M.; Ortiz-Rios, E.; Tong, L.; Shaked, A.; Brown, R. S.; Ojo, A. O.; Hayashi, P. H.; Berg, C. L.; Abecassis, M. M.; Ashworth, A. S.; Friese, C. E.; Hong, J. C.; Trotter, J. F.; Everhart, J. E.; (2010). "Database Comparison of the Adult-to-Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation Cohort Study (A2ALL) and the SRTR U.S. Transplant Registry † , ‡ ." American Journal of Transplantation 10(7): 1621-1633. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/78589>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1600-6135en_US
dc.identifier.issn1600-6143en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/78589
dc.description.abstractData submitted by transplant programs to the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) are used by the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) for policy development, performance evaluation and research. This study compared OPTN/SRTR data with data extracted from medical records by research coordinators from the nine-center A2ALL study. A2ALL data were collected independently of OPTN data submission (48 data elements among 785 liver transplant candidates/recipients; 12 data elements among 386 donors). At least 90% agreement occurred between OPTN/SRTR and A2ALL for 11/29 baseline recipient elements, 4/19 recipient transplant or follow-up elements and 6/12 donor elements. For the remaining recipient and donor elements, >10% of values were missing in OPTN/SRTR but present in A2ALL, confirming that missing data were largely avoidable. Other than variables required for allocation, the percentage missing varied widely by center. These findings support an expanded focus on data quality control by OPTN/SRTR for a broader variable set than those used for allocation. Center-specific monitoring of missing values could substantially improve the data.en_US
dc.format.extent162564 bytes
dc.format.extent3106 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Incen_US
dc.subject.otherData Validationen_US
dc.subject.otherDatabaseen_US
dc.subject.otherLive Donor Transplantationen_US
dc.subject.otherLiver Transplantationen_US
dc.subject.otherQuality Assessmenten_US
dc.titleDatabase Comparison of the Adult-to-Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation Cohort Study (A2ALL) and the SRTR U.S. Transplant Registry † , ‡en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMedicine (General)en_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MIen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MIen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Biostatisticsen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDivision of Transplantation, Health Resources and Services Administration, US Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, MDen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Medicine, Columbia University College of Physicians & Surgeons, New York, NYen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Surgery, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NCen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Medicine, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Surgery, Northwestern University, Chicago, ILen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Surgery, Medical College of Virginia Hospitals, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Surgery, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO (Current affiliation = Department of Medicine, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX)en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDivision of Digestive Diseases and Nutrition, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MDen_US
dc.identifier.pmid20199501en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/78589/1/j.1600-6143.2010.03039.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1600-6143.2010.03039.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceAmerican Journal of Transplantationen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.