Show simple item record

Ontic Occlusion and Exposure in Sociotechnical Systems

dc.contributor.authorKnobel, Cory Philipen_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-01-18T16:06:18Z
dc.date.availableNO_RESTRICTIONen_US
dc.date.available2011-01-18T16:06:18Z
dc.date.issued2010en_US
dc.date.submitteden_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/78763
dc.description.abstractLiving inside built environments - infrastructure - it is easy to take for granted the things that we do not need to engage, but are at work behind the scenes nonetheless. Well-designed systems become invisible, but to engage them, how do we know which perspectives, objects, and relationships are useful? I examine the University of Michigan Digital Library (UMDL), a mid-1990s interdisciplinary project attempting to build an agent-based digital library architecture. Through analyzing project data, I develop the concept of ontic occlusion and exposure - mechanisms of choice regarding objects and relationships that enter discourses and representations. By analyzing project artifacts, interview transcripts, and meeting records, this study iden- tifies key sets of discursive elements bridging concepts between disciplinary communities on the surface, but were the fundamental sites of contestation between groups’ understanding of project goals. I examine narratives of project personnel to understand the positioning of terms and ideas relating to project design, execution, and assessment, and discuss the role of the ontic in interdisciplinary work. Using data from the UMDL project, I discuss the tension between occlusion (the hidden) and exposure (the revealed) in understanding the digital library as an object through meet- ings of the project operating committee - the primary engagement site between researchers from different departments, primarily computer engineering and library science. Examining interpretive differences, use of fundamental terms, and observations about the contested responses toward resolution, we can better understand the outcomes of the project, the disciplinary positioning of institutional change, and perspectives of evaluating the project in the subsequent years. This dissertation contributes to an understanding of discourse development in interdisciplinary projects where shared language is important to design, execution, and evaluation. It combines perspectives in philosophy, digital libraries, and interdisciplinarity studies. The complementary mechanisms of ontic occlusion and exposure are useful devices to decode and describe change in sociotechnical systems, and highlight the need to examine more closely both what is rendered in accounts of infrastructure, and residual categories often left unaddressed.en_US
dc.format.extent5301738 bytes
dc.format.extent1373 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/octet-stream
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectCyberinfrastructureen_US
dc.subjectDigital Librariesen_US
dc.subjectOntologyen_US
dc.subjectDiscourseen_US
dc.subjectSociotechnicalen_US
dc.titleOntic Occlusion and Exposure in Sociotechnical Systemsen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreenamePhDen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineInformationen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studiesen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberKing, John L.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberBowker, Geoffrey C.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberDuderstadt, James J.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberFinholt, Thomas A.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberStar, Susan Leighen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelInformation and Library Scienceen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/78763/1/cknobel_1.pdf
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.