Show simple item record

Knowledge-based Methods for Evaluation of Engineering Changes.

dc.contributor.authorMehta, Chandresh Rajnikanten_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-01-18T16:19:44Z
dc.date.availableNO_RESTRICTIONen_US
dc.date.available2011-01-18T16:19:44Z
dc.date.issued2010en_US
dc.date.submitteden_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/78926
dc.description.abstractEngineering Changes (ECs) are an integral part of a product's lifecycle. A proposed EC can affect several lifecycle-wide components. Detailed evaluation of each proposed EC or its effect is time-consuming and inefficient. Therefore, enterprises plan detailed evaluation of only those EC effects that might have a high cost impact. Currently, domain experts decide which effects should undergo a detailed evaluation process. Such an approach relies heavily on personal experience and is less reliable. To address this problem, this research develops a systematic knowledge-based method for determining whether a proposed EC effect has high impact and would require a detailed evaluation. Only some of the large number of EC attributes are important for retrieving past EC, which can be used to evaluate the impact of a proposed EC. This research formulates the problem of determining important EC attributes as a multi-objective optimization problem. Information-theoretic concepts are used to define measures for quantifying importance of an attribute subset. The domain knowledge and the information in EC database are combined to estimate probability distributions, which are required in computation of measures. An Ant Colony Optimization based search approach is developed for efficiently locating the important attribute set. Utilizing past EC knowledge to predict the impact of proposed EC effect requires an approach to compute similarity between EC. The second part of this research presents an approach to compute similarity between EC that are defined using disparate attributes. Since the available information is probabilistic, the measures of information are utilized for defining measures to compute similarity between two attribute values or EC. The semantics associated with attribute values are utilized to compute similarity between attribute values. In the last part of this research, an approach is developed to predict impact of proposed EC effect based on the similar past ECs. The approach incorporates a technique to quantify differences between important attribute values in proposed EC and a similar past EC. The Bayes' rule is used to determine differences in impact value from the differences in attribute values. The probability values required in the Bayes' rule are determined based on the minimum cross entropy principle.en_US
dc.format.extent2018021 bytes
dc.format.extent1373 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectEngineering Changeen_US
dc.subjectManufacturingen_US
dc.subjectKnowledge-based Impact Evaluation of Engineering Changeen_US
dc.subjectData Miningen_US
dc.subjectEngineering Change Managementen_US
dc.subjectExpert System for Engineering Change Evaluationen_US
dc.titleKnowledge-based Methods for Evaluation of Engineering Changes.en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreenamePhDen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineMechanical Engineeringen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studiesen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberDutta, Debasishen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberPatil, Laliten_US
dc.contributor.committeememberRadev, Dragomir Radkoven_US
dc.contributor.committeememberSaitou, Kazuhiroen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelComputer Scienceen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMechanical Engineeringen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelEngineeringen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/78926/1/mehtacr_1.pdf
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.