Show simple item record

Growing Cell-Phone Population and Noncoverage Bias in Traditional Random Digit Dial Telephone Health Surveys

dc.contributor.authorLee, Sungheeen_US
dc.contributor.authorBrick, J. Michaelen_US
dc.contributor.authorBrown, E. Richarden_US
dc.contributor.authorGrant, Daviden_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-01-31T17:24:34Z
dc.date.available2011-10-03T17:19:15Zen_US
dc.date.issued2010-08en_US
dc.identifier.citationLee, Sunghee; Brick, J. Michael; Brown, E. Richard; Grant, David; (2010). "Growing Cell-Phone Population and Noncoverage Bias in Traditional Random Digit Dial Telephone Health Surveys." Health Services Research 45(4): 1121-1139. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/79068>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0017-9124en_US
dc.identifier.issn1475-6773en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/79068
dc.description.abstractExamine the effect of including cell-phone numbers in a traditional landline random digit dial (RDD) telephone survey.The 2007 California Health Interview Survey (CHIS).CHIS 2007 is an RDD telephone survey supplementing a landline sample in California with a sample of cell-only (CO) adults.We examined the degree of bias due to exclusion of CO populations and compared a series of demographic and health-related characteristics by telephone usage.When adjusted for noncoverage in the landline sample through weighting, the potential noncoverage bias due to excluding CO adults in landline telephone surveys is diminished. Both CO adults and adults who have both landline and cell phones but mostly use cell phones appear different from other telephone usage groups. Controlling for demographic differences did not attenuate the significant distinctiveness of cell-mostly adults.While careful weighting can mitigate noncoverage bias in landline telephone surveys, the rapid growth of cell-phone population and their distinctive characteristics suggest it is important to include a cell-phone sample. Moreover, the threat of noncoverage bias in telephone health survey estimates could mislead policy makers with possibly serious consequences for their ability to address important health policy issues.en_US
dc.format.extent165469 bytes
dc.format.extent3106 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Incen_US
dc.subject.otherTelephone Surveysen_US
dc.subject.otherSurvey Methodsen_US
dc.subject.otherSurvey Noncoverage Biasen_US
dc.subject.otherCalifornia Health Interview Surveyen_US
dc.titleGrowing Cell-Phone Population and Noncoverage Bias in Traditional Random Digit Dial Telephone Health Surveysen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPublic Healthen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumInstitute for Social Research, University of Michigan, 426 Thompson St., Ann Arbor, MI 48104en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherWestat Inc., Rockville, MDen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherUCLA Center for Health Policy Research and Department of Health Services, Los Angeles, CA.en_US
dc.identifier.pmid20500221en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/79068/1/j.1475-6773.2010.01120.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1475-6773.2010.01120.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceHealth Services Researchen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.