Show simple item record

Lung Transplantation in the United States, 1999–2008

dc.contributor.authorYusen, R. D.en_US
dc.contributor.authorShearon, Tempie H.en_US
dc.contributor.authorQian, Y.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKotloff, R.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBarr, M. L.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSweet, Stuart C.en_US
dc.contributor.authorDyke, David B. S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMurray, S.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-01-31T17:25:55Z
dc.date.available2011-06-09T15:09:40Zen_US
dc.date.issued2010-04en_US
dc.identifier.citationYusen, R. D.; Shearon, T. H.; Qian, Y.; Kotloff, R.; Barr, M. L.; Sweet, S.; Dyke, D. B.; Murray, S.; (2010). "Lung Transplantation in the United States, 1999–2008." American Journal of Transplantation 10(4p2 The 2009 SRTR Report on the State of Transplantation ): 1047-1068. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/79080>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1600-6135en_US
dc.identifier.issn1600-6143en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/79080
dc.description.abstractThis article highlights trends and changes in lung and heart–lung transplantation in the United States from 1999 to 2008. While adult lung transplantation grew significantly over the past decade, rates of heart–lung and pediatric lung transplantation have remained low. Since implementation of the lung allocation score (LAS) donor allocation system in 2005, decreases in the number of active waiting list patients, waiting times for lung transplantation and death rates on the waiting list have occurred. However, characteristics of recipients transplanted in the LAS era differed from those transplanted earlier. The proportion of candidates undergoing lung transplantation for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease decreased, while increasing for those with pulmonary fibrosis. In the LAS era, older, sicker and previously transplanted candidates underwent transplantation more frequently compared with the previous era. Despite these changes, when compared with the pre-LAS era, 1-year survival after lung transplantation did not significantly change after LAS inception. The long-term effects of the change in the characteristics of lung transplant recipients on overall outcomes for lung transplantation remain unknown. Continued surveillance and refinements to the LAS system will affect the distribution and types of candidates transplanted and hopefully lead to improved system efficiency and outcomes.en_US
dc.format.extent595850 bytes
dc.format.extent3106 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Incen_US
dc.subject.otherDeceased Donor Organsen_US
dc.subject.otherLung Transplantationen_US
dc.subject.otherLiving Donor Transplantationen_US
dc.subject.otherScientific Registry of Transplant Recipientsen_US
dc.subject.otherOrgan Allocationen_US
dc.subject.otherOrgan Procurement and Transplantation Networken_US
dc.titleLung Transplantation in the United States, 1999–2008en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMedicine (General)en_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MIen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherWashington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MOen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherScientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, Ann Arbor, MIen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherKidney Epidemiology and Cost Center, Ann Arbor, MIen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherUniversity of Pennsylvania Medical Center, Philadelphia, PAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherUniversity of Southern California, Los Angeles, CAen_US
dc.identifier.pmid20420652en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/79080/1/j.1600-6143.2010.03055.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1600-6143.2010.03055.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceAmerican Journal of Transplantationen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.