Show simple item record

The clinical presentation and prognostic factors for intrahepatic and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in a tertiary care centre

dc.contributor.authorSingal, Amit G.en_US
dc.contributor.authorRakoski, Mina O.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSalgia, R.en_US
dc.contributor.authorPelletier, Shawn J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWelling, Theodore H.en_US
dc.contributor.authorFontana, Robert Johnen_US
dc.contributor.authorLok, Anna Suk-Fongen_US
dc.contributor.authorMarrero, Jorge A.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-01-31T17:28:29Z
dc.date.available2011-05-04T18:52:58Zen_US
dc.date.issued2010-03en_US
dc.identifier.citationSingal, A. G.; Rakoski, M. O.; Salgia, R.; Pelletier, S.; Welling, T. H.; Fontana, R. J.; Lok, A. S.; Marrero, J. A.; (2010). "The clinical presentation and prognostic factors for intrahepatic and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in a tertiary care centre." Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics 31(6): 625-633. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/79101>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0269-2813en_US
dc.identifier.issn1365-2036en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/79101
dc.description.abstractAliment Pharmacol Ther   31 , 625–633The incidence of cholangiocarcinoma is rising. Accurate predictors of survival at diagnosis are not well defined.To clarify the clinical presentation and prognostic factors of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in a contemporary cohort of patients.Records for consecutive patients at the University of Michigan hospital diagnosed with cholangiocarcinoma between January 2003 and April 2008 were reviewed.In all, 136 patients had cholangiocarcinoma (79 intra- and 57 extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma). Median survival was 27.3 months–25.8 months for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and 30.3 months for extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Independent predictors of mortality at presentation on multivariate analysis were elevated bilirubin level (HR 1.04, 95%CI 1.01–1.07), CA 19-9 levels >100 U/mL (HR 1.90, 95%CI 1.17–3.08) and stage of disease (HR 1.51, 95%CI 1.16–1.96). After adjusting for baseline prognostic factors, surgical therapy was associated with improved survival (HR 0.48; 95% CI 0.26–0.88). There were no significant differences regarding clinical presentation, disease stage ( P  = 0.98), and survival ( P  = 0.51) between intra- and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.Survival for cholangiocarcinoma remains poor with no significant difference in outcomes between intra- and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Stage of disease, bilirubin level and CA 19-9 level are important prognostic factors at presentation. Surgical therapy provides similar efficacy for both tumours when adjusted for other prognostic variables.en_US
dc.format.extent185386 bytes
dc.format.extent3106 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltden_US
dc.titleThe clinical presentation and prognostic factors for intrahepatic and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in a tertiary care centreen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelOtolaryngologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPharmacy and Pharmacologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumSurgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherInternal Medicineen_US
dc.identifier.pmid20003093en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/79101/1/j.1365-2036.2009.04218.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1365-2036.2009.04218.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceAlimentary Pharmacology & Therapeuticsen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.