Show simple item record

Plant defence theory re-examined: nonlinear expectations based on the costs and benefits of resource mutualisms

dc.contributor.authorVannette, Rachel L.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHunter, Mark D.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-01-31T17:39:11Z
dc.date.available2012-03-05T15:30:01Zen_US
dc.date.issued2011-01en_US
dc.identifier.citationVannette, Rachel L.; Hunter, Mark D.; (2011). "Plant defence theory re-examined: nonlinear expectations based on the costs and benefits of resource mutualisms." Journal of Ecology 99(1): 66-76. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/79195>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0022-0477en_US
dc.identifier.issn1365-2745en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/79195
dc.description.abstract1.  General theories of plant defence often fail to account for complex interactions between the resources required for defence expression. For example, the carbon that is used for carbon-based defence is acquired using nutrient-rich photosynthetic pigments, while nutrient gain itself requires substantial carbon allocation belowground. We should therefore expect the expression of plant defence to reflect the tight linkage between carbon and nutrient gain, yet mechanistic studies linking resource gain with plant defence theory have been slow to emerge. 2.  The overwhelming majority of plants participate in nutrition mutualisms with fungal or bacterial symbionts. We propose the resource exchange model of plant defence (REMPD) in which the costs and benefits associated with nutrition mutualisms affect plant resource status and allocation to growth and defence. The model predicts quadratic relationships between mutualist abundance and expression of defence. Within plant genotypes, both plant biomass and defence expression are maximized at optimal nutrient exchange among mutualistic partners, and as a consequence, the two are positively associated. 3.  We tested the model by growing Asclepias syriaca , the common milkweed, with two mycorrhizal fungal species in nine fungal abundance treatments. Plant growth and defence traits and mycorrhizal colonization were quantified after 14 weeks of plant growth. Linear, quadratic, saturating and exponential decay models were fit to curves relating the proportion of root colonized by mycorrhizal fungi to plant traits, and compared using AICc. 4.  As predicted by our model, increasing colonization by Scutellospora pellucida produced quadratic responses in plant growth, latex exudation and cardenolide production. In contrast, Glomus etunicatum appeared to act as a parasite of A. syriaca , causing exponential decline in both plant growth and latex exudation. As predicted by our model, plant growth was positively correlated with all defences quantified. 5.   Synthesis . The REMPD combines cost–benefit analysis of mutualisms with plant resource acquisition strategies to predict the expression of plant defence. The effects of S. pellucida and G. etunicatum on defence expression differ; however, both provide support for the model and suggest that resource mutualisms affect the expression of defence in a predictable nonlinear fashion.en_US
dc.format.extent441441 bytes
dc.format.extent3106 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltden_US
dc.subject.otherArbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungien_US
dc.subject.otherAsclepias Syriacaen_US
dc.subject.otherCarbon–Nutrient Balance Hypothesisen_US
dc.subject.otherGlomus Etunicatumen_US
dc.subject.otherGrowth-differentiation Balance Hypothesisen_US
dc.subject.otherPlant–Herbivore Interactionsen_US
dc.subject.otherResource Exchange Model of Plant Defenceen_US
dc.subject.otherScutellospora Pellucidaen_US
dc.titlePlant defence theory re-examined: nonlinear expectations based on the costs and benefits of resource mutualismsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEcology and Evolutionary Biologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, 2086 Kraus Natural Science Building, 830 North University Avenue, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1048, USAen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/79195/1/j.1365-2745.2010.01755.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1365-2745.2010.01755.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Ecologyen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe its collections in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in them. We encourage you to Contact Us anonymously if you encounter harmful or problematic language in catalog records or finding aids. More information about our policies and practices is available at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.