Plant defence theory re-examined: nonlinear expectations based on the costs and benefits of resource mutualisms
dc.contributor.author | Vannette, Rachel L. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Hunter, Mark D. | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2011-01-31T17:39:11Z | |
dc.date.available | 2012-03-05T15:30:01Z | en_US |
dc.date.issued | 2011-01 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Vannette, Rachel L.; Hunter, Mark D.; (2011). "Plant defence theory re-examined: nonlinear expectations based on the costs and benefits of resource mutualisms." Journal of Ecology 99(1): 66-76. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/79195> | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0022-0477 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1365-2745 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/79195 | |
dc.description.abstract | 1. General theories of plant defence often fail to account for complex interactions between the resources required for defence expression. For example, the carbon that is used for carbon-based defence is acquired using nutrient-rich photosynthetic pigments, while nutrient gain itself requires substantial carbon allocation belowground. We should therefore expect the expression of plant defence to reflect the tight linkage between carbon and nutrient gain, yet mechanistic studies linking resource gain with plant defence theory have been slow to emerge. 2. The overwhelming majority of plants participate in nutrition mutualisms with fungal or bacterial symbionts. We propose the resource exchange model of plant defence (REMPD) in which the costs and benefits associated with nutrition mutualisms affect plant resource status and allocation to growth and defence. The model predicts quadratic relationships between mutualist abundance and expression of defence. Within plant genotypes, both plant biomass and defence expression are maximized at optimal nutrient exchange among mutualistic partners, and as a consequence, the two are positively associated. 3. We tested the model by growing Asclepias syriaca , the common milkweed, with two mycorrhizal fungal species in nine fungal abundance treatments. Plant growth and defence traits and mycorrhizal colonization were quantified after 14 weeks of plant growth. Linear, quadratic, saturating and exponential decay models were fit to curves relating the proportion of root colonized by mycorrhizal fungi to plant traits, and compared using AICc. 4. As predicted by our model, increasing colonization by Scutellospora pellucida produced quadratic responses in plant growth, latex exudation and cardenolide production. In contrast, Glomus etunicatum appeared to act as a parasite of A. syriaca , causing exponential decline in both plant growth and latex exudation. As predicted by our model, plant growth was positively correlated with all defences quantified. 5. Synthesis . The REMPD combines cost–benefit analysis of mutualisms with plant resource acquisition strategies to predict the expression of plant defence. The effects of S. pellucida and G. etunicatum on defence expression differ; however, both provide support for the model and suggest that resource mutualisms affect the expression of defence in a predictable nonlinear fashion. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 441441 bytes | |
dc.format.extent | 3106 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.format.mimetype | text/plain | |
dc.publisher | Blackwell Publishing Ltd | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Asclepias Syriaca | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Carbon–Nutrient Balance Hypothesis | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Glomus Etunicatum | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Growth-differentiation Balance Hypothesis | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Plant–Herbivore Interactions | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Resource Exchange Model of Plant Defence | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Scutellospora Pellucida | en_US |
dc.title | Plant defence theory re-examined: nonlinear expectations based on the costs and benefits of resource mutualisms | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.rights.robots | IndexNoFollow | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Ecology and Evolutionary Biology | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Science | en_US |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer Reviewed | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, 2086 Kraus Natural Science Building, 830 North University Avenue, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1048, USA | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/79195/1/j.1365-2745.2010.01755.x.pdf | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2010.01755.x | en_US |
dc.identifier.source | Journal of Ecology | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Interdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe its collections in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in them. We encourage you to Contact Us anonymously if you encounter harmful or problematic language in catalog records or finding aids. More information about our policies and practices is available at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.