Show simple item record

Diminishing Efficacy of Combination Therapy, Response-Heterogeneity, and Treatment Intolerance Limit the Attainability of Tight Risk Factor Control in Patients with Diabetes

dc.contributor.authorTimbie, Justin W.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHayward, Rodney A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorVijan, Sandeepen_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-01-31T17:47:28Z
dc.date.available2011-06-09T15:09:40Zen_US
dc.date.issued2010-04en_US
dc.identifier.citationTimbie, Justin W.; Hayward, Rodney A.; Vijan, Sandeep; (2010). "Diminishing Efficacy of Combination Therapy, Response-Heterogeneity, and Treatment Intolerance Limit the Attainability of Tight Risk Factor Control in Patients with Diabetes." Health Services Research 45(2): 437-456. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/79268>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0017-9124en_US
dc.identifier.issn1475-6773en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/79268
dc.description.abstractTo evaluate the attainability of tight risk factor control targets for three diabetes risk factors and to assess the degree of polypharmacy required.National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey-III.We simulated a strategy of “treating to targets,” exposing subjects to a battery of treatments until low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol (100 mg/dL), hemoglobin A1c (7 percent), and blood pressure (130/80 mm Hg) targets were achieved or until all treatments had been exhausted. Regimens included five statins of increasing potency, four A1c-lowering therapies, and eight steps of antihypertensive therapy.We selected parameter estimates from placebo-controlled trials and meta-analyses.Under ideal efficacy conditions, 77, 64, and 58 percent of subjects achieved the LDL, A1c, and blood pressure targets, respectively. Successful control depended highly on a subject's baseline number of treatments. Using the least favorable assumptions of treatment tolerance, success rates were 11–17 percentage points lower. Approximately 57 percent of subjects required five or more medication classes.A significant proportion of people with diabetes will fail to achieve targets despite using high doses of multiple, conventional treatments. These findings raise concerns about the feasibility and polypharmacy burden needed for tight risk factor control, and the use of measures of tight control to assess the quality of care for diabetes.en_US
dc.format.extent230376 bytes
dc.format.extent134601 bytes
dc.format.extent3106 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Incen_US
dc.subject.otherQuality Measurementen_US
dc.subject.otherMonte Carlo Simulationen_US
dc.subject.otherOutcomes Researchen_US
dc.subject.otherDiabetes Mellitusen_US
dc.titleDiminishing Efficacy of Combination Therapy, Response-Heterogeneity, and Treatment Intolerance Limit the Attainability of Tight Risk Factor Control in Patients with Diabetesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPublic Healthen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Internal Medicine & The Robert Wood Johnson Clinical Scholars Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MIen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherRAND Corporation, 1200 South Hayes Street, Arlington, VA 22202en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Veterans Affairs, VA HSR&D Center of Excellence, Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MIen_US
dc.identifier.pmid20070387en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/79268/1/j.1475-6773.2009.01075.x.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/79268/2/HESR_1075_sm_appendix.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1475-6773.2009.01075.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceHealth Services Researchen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.