Immunostaining in Mohs Micrographic Surgery: A Review
dc.contributor.author | El Tal, Abdel Kader | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Abrou, Ayad E. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Stiff, Mark A. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Mehregan, David A. | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2011-01-31T17:51:37Z | |
dc.date.available | 2011-05-04T18:52:58Z | en_US |
dc.date.issued | 2010-03 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | El Tal, Abdel Kader; Abrou, Ayad E.; Stiff, Mark A.; Mehregan, David A.; (2010). "Immunostaining in Mohs Micrographic Surgery: A Review." Dermatologic Surgery 36(3): 275-290. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/79305> | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1076-0512 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1524-4725 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/79305 | |
dc.description.abstract | With the advent of incorporating the immunoperoxidase staining technique into the processing of frozen tissue, the use of Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) has been expanded to include several high-risk tumors such as lentigo maligna, malignant melanoma, and dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans.To thoroughly review the English medical literature pertaining to the use of immunohistochemical staining techniques on frozen sections during MMS and to summarize the basic relevant outcomes from the different relevant studies.Medline search was conducted, with the following words used in the search criteria: “Mohs surgery,”“staining,”“immunostaining,” and “immunoperoxidase.”Generally, all immunostains showed advantage over the traditional hematoxylin and eosin approach. Studies of MART-1 in melanoma chemosurgery indicated that it is typically crisp and has less background staining than MEL-5 and better staining consistency than HMB-45. In cases of desmoplastic melanomas, S100 is the stain of choice.Immunostaining offers an advantage in MMS. Large, randomized, prospective studies comparing the different immunostains are still lacking in the literature. The authors have indicated no significant interest with commercial supporters. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 2718577 bytes | |
dc.format.extent | 3106 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.format.mimetype | text/plain | |
dc.publisher | Blackwell Publishing Inc | en_US |
dc.title | Immunostaining in Mohs Micrographic Surgery: A Review | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.rights.robots | IndexNoFollow | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Dermatology | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Health Sciences | en_US |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer Reviewed | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | Dermatology Department, Wayne State University, Dearborn, Michigan | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | Beacon Hill Dermatology, Dearborn, Michigan | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | Skin Cancer Center of Southeast Michigan, Southfield, Michigan | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | Pinkus Dermatopathology Laboratory, Monroe, Michigan | en_US |
dc.identifier.pmid | 20100275 | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/79305/1/j.1524-4725.2009.01432.x.pdf | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2009.01432.x | en_US |
dc.identifier.source | Dermatologic Surgery | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Interdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.